Forum menu
Why do people wear ...
 

[Closed] Why do people wear baggy shorts?

 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

njee20 - Member

[b]End of the day, does anyone actually ride for the image?[/b]

Yes, vast swathes of people on this thread! [b]TBH I'm one of the worst for it[/b]


FTFY

😉


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:29 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

People ride a bike for 'The Image'?
Jesus H Corbett.

Sadder than my mum's funeral.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

best of all i dont look like a gimp!

I imagine you feel like one though!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:29 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Are you including yourself in that?

No, I know that to the general public I look absolutely ridiculous. I cycle because I love it, not because of what other people will think of me. I'm happy with how I look whilst doing it, and I wear the most appropriate kit for the job.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Hora is a law unto himself. He combines the worst of the lycra image with the worst of the baggy image, with a bit of day-glo thrown in for good measure. He looks like Fiddles the Erotic Clown, cycling to his next children's party.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:30 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Yes, vast swathes of people on this thread!

So all the roadies I see wearing full team replica kit that matches the colour of their bike, helmet and gloves - they're not riding for the image, but people who wear ordinary shorts on a bike are? 😕


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So all the roadies I see wearing full team replica kit that matches the colour of their bike, helmet and gloves

To be fair, they're the worst of the lot.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:31 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I do loads of 2-5mile journeys and TBH I wouldn't even bother raising my saddle to be able to sit down for that sort of distance, let alone get changed out of my everyday clothes


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So all the roadies I see wearing full team replica kit that matches the colour of their bike, helmet and gloves

Don't forget having your bike stickered up with your name and an England flag 😉


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So all the roadies I see wearing full team replica kit that matches the colour of their bike,

These people are wrong too, there is even a level of wrongness amongst lycra wearers you know.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:34 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

TBH I wouldn't even bother raising my saddle to be able to sit down for that sort of distance

**swoons**

🙄


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:34 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

As a Gentleman mountaineer, I took up MTB as another way to enjoy the mountains and procurer some magnificent clean air. A Gentleman in the mountains, no matter what his means of access, should be appropriately attired at all times, specifically in a manner which befits his modesty, public decency and upholds the good name of the British Alpine Club.

I'd go so far as to suggest, that persons who display lycra in the mountains are not actually mountain bikers and have no 'mountain' background, but road cyclists, out of their depth, inappropriately dressed for such an activity and deliberately displaying their sausages.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:35 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No, I know that to the general public I look absolutely ridiculous. I cycle because I love it, not because of what other people will think of me.

That's TJ you've described, only the first bit is true for you. 😉

**swoons**
you should try it some time, you might actually find yourself having some fun on your bike for a change. 😉


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:36 am
Posts: 57370
Full Member
 

To be fair to Hora he goes through phases. I particularly enjoyed his 'Nam veteran phase. He even developed the 1000 yard stare. I reckon he did this by recalling childhood abuse at the hands of his tennis coach. Who used to wear tight shorts. Hence he can't wear lycra. Its too painful. Literally


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:36 am
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

but people who wear ordinary shorts on a bike are?

But there not "ordinary" shorts are they, they are bike specific baggy shorts. For balance i have done 80miles in jeans in the past, a deeply unpleasant experience, hence i went out and bought some lycra shorts and they were a revelation, this was £15 Caratti specials, so nothing special in the least. No seams, no restrictions, much cooler. etc.

The only time i wear baggy shorts is waterproof overshorts and to be fair i hate them, but they do what i bought them to do. hot, flappy, and restrictive.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:38 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]I mean how many miles do you do per week? If your doing 150+ then you'll be wearing lycra, you wouldnt want to do it in baggy shorts. Any less than 100 per week and I'd say your not a serious cyclist really, just someone that's basically bought into a lifestyle. [/i]

😉 I ride about 150 miles a week, usually a lot more in summer. Always in baggies whether I'm on the road bike, cross bike or mountain bike. Never, ever had a problem with wearing baggies, I can spend all day in the saddle and kick out a 200 miler in baggies.

HTH.

I wear them because I've found coming off in lycra leaves you naked and I really do feel quite exposed with my genitals on show.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Road or MTB racing - padded lycra only as otherwise I get too hot and none of the reasons below come into the equation.

For more serious/technical riding I like padded lycra with baggies/overshorts as they:

1. Offer more protection if you come off and stop your lycra getting holed.

2. Offer more protection from mud and water (esp if waterproof) so I don't get as wet and uncomfortable on longer rides and also stops the pad being destroyed by grit, etc. They also stop brambles, nettles, etc from destroying my legs as much. Help keep me warmer in the cold too.

3. Hold a map and compass where they are readily to hand without getting in the way.

4. Reduce the rubbing that can occur on rougher rides. Smooth terrain is fine in lycra but baggies give an extra layer of movement that I find reduces chafing over choppier ground.

Please note that these are MY opinions of why I wear them in response to the OP. You don't have to agree but neither do you need to persecute or disparage me or others for our choices that, at the end of the day, do not affect you in any way, shape of form. Both sides need to get over themselves.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:41 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

you should try it some time, you might actually find yourself having some fun on your bike for a change.

I can't even put my seat down in the first place! I have plenty of fun on my bike though, if I didn't I'd not ride it... I'm not too sure how I'd have more fun by making it harder though.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you're not riding naked you're not doing it right..


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:43 am
Posts: 57370
Full Member
 

shall we broker the subject of peaks on helmets? Or is that for another thread?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:43 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

But there not "ordinary" shorts are they, they are bike specific baggy shorts.

I sometimes wear ordinary shorts on the bike :gasp:

Like these:

[img] http://scotts.scene7.com/is/image/JDSports/14367sca?wid=325&$pos=0,15&resmode=sharp&op_usm=1.1,0.5,0,0&defaultImage=JDSports/scottsImageMissing [/img]

Is that OK?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Obviously it's not OK. Call yourself a cyclist? Pah. You're just a thinner version of Ray Mears.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:46 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not too sure how I'd have more fun by [s]making it harder though.[/s] [b]actually trying something different/new[/b]

😯
*is not even slightly surprised*


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But there not "ordinary" shorts are they, they are bike specific baggy shorts

Lol. The difference is?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Nope, sorry, riding with your saddle down (as you implied I should try) is harder. It may be a bit more controlled on the descents, but it's harder to ride, considering one has to ride up the hills too. I'm not particularly interested in making it harder for myself! If you want to, that's fine, I'm clearly not as fit as you, and find the terrain sufficiently challenging without such adaptations.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:49 am
Posts: 787
Free Member
 

Baggy Shorts or Lycra?

well I dont care either way as its really a matter of personal taste. Just remember that its not an either/or question... you all have an alternative....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Gentleman in the mountains ... should be appropriately attired at all times

Apparently some of these new 'sports' climbers don't even wear ties 😮


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:52 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

A Gentleman in the mountains ... should be appropriately attired at all times

Maybe this is the point, most of these lycra-freaks don't actually ride their bikes in the mountains. 😉


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:54 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OMG! the world according to Njee must be a ****ing scary place, but i s'pose the blinkers will help a bit 😉


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:56 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Maybe this is the point, most of these lycra-freaks [s]don't[/s] actually ride their bikes in the mountains instead of standing in the car park, propping up fence posts, rummaging in their oversized Camelbaks, discussing how rad they are and then retiring to the pub after 200 yards

Spot on!

C'mon then GW, explain your point? You said that you don't put your saddle up to ride 5 miles, and that I should try it as I may have more fun. I'm not sure how you're qualified to comment on the amount of fun I'm having. Please explain this further. Also I'd like to know how I'm blinkered? Email in profile if you prefer!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:57 am
 gamo
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Lycra and Baggies pah! tailored tweed is what everyone should be wearing.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jeez, this thread encapsulates everything I love and hate about this forum in one place. Good work.

The question is, does it really matter?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:58 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Go on then njee20, when was the last time you rode your bike on a mountain (not just round and round a muddy field 😉 )?


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:59 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The question is, does it really matter?

Of course not! It's a forum about a minority sport! But it's been very active, and kept me entertained at work!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 11:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wear ordinary sports shorts on the bike....the same ones i wear in the gym, playing squash etc....about medium length, quick drying synthetic material and come with the netting/lining on the inside thus negating the need for lycra and/or underwear....usually cost about a fiver from any sports shop.

The idea of spending £50+ on cycling specific baggies has to be one of the biggest cons going.....seriously Alpinestars, Fox etc must be laughing all the way to the bank.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:02 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

The idea of spending £50+ on cycling specific baggies has to be one of the biggest cons going.....seriously Alpinestars, Fox etc must be laughing all the way to the bank.

Agreed, don't think I've ever paid more than £20 for a pair of shorts. I saw some that cost £85 the other day!


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wow, what a delightful thread.

i wear baggies cos i fall off loads and ride in the woods.

i dont wear lycra cos, unlike some people, i think of the children.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course not! It's a forum about a minority sport!

Pfft, minority! here in Bristol because of the new trails every man and his dog has taken up Mtbing, it's a sea of baggies, 100 litre camel humps and peaked helmets.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The idea of spending £50+ on cycling specific baggies has to be one of the biggest cons going.....seriously Alpinestars, Fox etc must be laughing all the way to the bank.

Sums it up. But if image is that important to you, I guess you have to cough up. I imagine most baggy short owners probably own several fox/alpinestars/sombrio casual items of clothing aswell.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lycra's so this morning.

I wrap myself in a layer of cling film. I'm so fast I'm giving myself a hard on.

whatnobeer ^ for the win


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:07 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Go on then njee20, when was the last time you rode your bike on a mountain (not just round and round a muddy field?

*deafening silence*


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

5 pages!!
Lycra, black only, on the roadie, lycra and baggies when offroad. Reason? simple, brambles, thorns, ferns, thick undergrowth that thrash me and my shorts, I just want a little extra protection see. I've not ridden an XC race in a long while, but if I did I guess lycra only.


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because lycra = wrong.

The guys who race the TDF could wear fairy suits if it made them go faster and no one would care as they are hard as nails. Same with elite level xc racers, and top swimmers and athletes.

You don't see sunday swimmers going to the pool in skin suits do you?

Unless you are racing (where every second counts), then there is no excuse. If you want to look like you have just got off one of the floats at gay pride, fare enough. (Nothing against homosexuals, I have been to pride and it is great fun 😀 )

Straight men who dress up in lycra and shave their legs for a sunday ride should be ashamed of themselves 😛


 
Posted : 09/09/2011 12:08 pm
Page 4 / 6