VO2max on Garmin
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] VO2max on Garmin

19 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
104 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Anyone know how it's calculated on the Garmin? What constants and data it uses? Does it use power or just HR? And how reliable is it compared to real VO2max for anyone who's had it lab tested? Google doesn't throw up many answers, suspect it's about as accurate as Strava estimated power 😉

Oh and feel free to willy wave if you have the lungs of a horse (or even the willy of a horse!) 😀


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For cycling it definately uses power since I don't get it on my edge 520. For running it is based on your pace and heart rate. It gives an estimate based your max hr.

As for accuracy I've no idea. My running vo2max is currently 51, which predicts race times that seem optimistic.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 4:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, the only thing I can find on the Garmin site is with reference to running devices and needing to have your HR max set correctly.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 7:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It is normally just a zone based on your FTP and which ever zone system you are using (Cogan etc)


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 7:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So FTP and HR zone then mapping table? If it’s all static data why does it pop up with a new value every now and then.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 7:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My garmins (500 & 800) will not change it, it has to be done manually. Training Peaks will update its zones if I have improved FTP (compared to previous data). I then have to manually update my garmin(s) if I want to use new values


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 7:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bit confused by that, it’s not a value I can change manually, it’s one that the Garmin calculates and just presents.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 7:56 pm
 beej
Posts: 4142
Full Member
 

My garmins (500 & 800) will not change it, it has to be done manually. Training Peaks will update its zones if I have improved FTP (compared to previous data). I then have to manually update my garmin(s) if I want to use new values

It's not the VO2 max zone that Blobby is asking about - it's the VO2 max calculation - gives a number in milliliters of oxygen used in one minute per kilogram of body weight.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 8:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oops, sorry, got wrong end of stick there!


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 8:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No problem.

Thanks beej. So would assume it uses weight from your profile. Just wondered what else it used as it’d be interesting to know specifically what values in a session triggered the new VO2max notification.

For example, I got a new one today. Wasn’t a particularly maxed out session though my HR was a bit high for the effort due to a cold. So was curious as to why it thinks the value has increased.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 8:16 pm
 beej
Posts: 4142
Full Member
 

Not maxed out? I saw those PRs...

I think it would have to use weight/age/sex and have a guess at lean muscle mass maybe, then calculate how much O2 you'd need to generate certain power for a certain HR maybe... lots of guessing.

Is yours in the 70s?

I'm about 60 at best from the Garmin algorithm, my much faster mate gets low 70s.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 8:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Zone 3 with a favourable wind 😉

Comes out high 70’s. Never been tested so who knows how accurate that is. Always been quite good at endurance sports so maybe it’s in the right sort of range. Just curious really as to what triggers it to pop up a new notification.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 8:31 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10065
Free Member
 

Dunno about the garmin but if you are interested your local uni could do the test for you for not a huge amount. I was tested pre kids when I was getting serious about training. Would have to dig the test results out but it was surprisingly good. Think it cost me an afternoon and £100...


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks DT though I doubt I'd know what to do with the info! Besides, knowing I had a low VO2max would likely be demoralising as I'd think is this as fast as I can get, and knowing I had a big VO2max would likely be demoralising as I'd think surely with all this work I should be quicker 😉


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:24 pm
Posts: 7474
Free Member
 

Don't know how it works it out, but the VO2max and race predictions seem rather optimistic for me. Like, a good minute faster than my actual 5k PB. All these things are just some curve that someone found to give a reasonable fit to a specific data set, I wouldn't expect great accuracy. (like the 220-age thing for max HR which is way off for many people).


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, quite likely. What was puzzling me is why it popped up after today's ride with a new value, given I've done harder longer efforts. Only unusual thing was that my HR was high for the effort due to chesty cold. So curious to know how it works it out.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:44 pm
Posts: 10324
Full Member
 

Anyone know how it's calculated on the Garmin? What constants and data it uses? Does it use power or just HR? And how reliable is it compared to real VO2max for anyone who's had it lab tested?
They claim 95% accuracy for the number. I think the prediction of your race times is a prediction of the best you could possibly do at that point rather than what you are likely to get

As far as I understand what they use are some fairly well known formulas but these formulas are based on running/cycling at a constant pace and workload which is unlikely for us. The 'secret sauce' is an algorithm that filters the standard HR (and power data for cycling) so only the appropriate parts are fed into the formula

more here: https://www.firstbeat.com/en/consumer-feature/vo2max-fitness-level/

I would guess that the best way to use these numbers is to tell you if you are getting better, ie. your training is actually doing something or if you are getting worse for some reason

edit: forgot to add, it needs your weight and age as well as they figure in the calculations so you will also need to keep those up to date


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:46 pm
Posts: 1172
Full Member
 

My old polar HRM used weight and an hr based algorithm. I don't know how the Garmin system works. Both the old polar system and my 520 got pretty close to my lab numbers.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks leffeboy, interesting stuff. Looks like Garmin get the performance condition from them too, I was wondering about that, had assumed incorrectly that it was mostly likely some HR variability based calculation.


 
Posted : 06/01/2018 10:02 pm
 Haze
Posts: 5404
Free Member
 

What was puzzling me is why it popped up after today's ride with a new value, given I've done harder longer efforts

Had something similar when I accidentally started a workout sat at home playing with the settings.

I never paid it much attention anyway, ignored it ever since.


 
Posted : 07/01/2018 12:17 am