True Bike Porn (IMO...
 

[Closed] True Bike Porn (IMO):Indy Fab,Moots,Eriksen,Seven,DeKerf,Strong, Potts etc

Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

🙂


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:44 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

If people feel good about having a '[s]special[/s]' bike then why not I suppose

This ^^^.

I have a garage full of bikes some mainstream some not.
Why should I not spend the same amount on a custom hardtail as i do on a more mainstream full suss.

None of them cost much anyway as they're all fakes. 😆


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anybody own a Moots? Always been interested as to how they ride


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:58 pm
Posts: 2448
Full Member
 

I really really want one of these...

but I might wait for the Surly Big Fat Ugly Ogre, a 29er with 4.7" fat tyres will be almost a 36er...


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:02 pm
Posts: 1073
Full Member
Topic starter
 

trying not to be defensive but when you start a thread requesting something in particular and then people start going off on tangents and dragging me with them then it gets to be a bit of a pain. yes this is STW and yes everyone is entitled to their opinion but i just wanted to see some nice bikes that i like and not have to try and justify them which is what i feel like i am having to do. maybe i have been wrong about some of my comments about custom built bikes but again everyone is piping in and saying they are ordinary bikes this and blah that. if you're not really that into custom built bikes then why are you reading this thread and making comments. Also no i'm not just into bikes with names on them. i just bought a Diamondback Axis frame from 1996 for £30 for gods sake so i think that rules out that argument plus ive had a few Marin hardtails as well which probably wouldnt look cool to the STW massive as well as you guys are all into your Orange 5s, Cotics, Lapierre and blah blah, blah blah

now can someone please tell me about these fake Indy Fabs so i dont end up with one someday? or are you just pulling my leg

thanks you


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:12 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

now can someone please tell me about these fake Indy Fabs

Email tollah and he'll give you the details.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if you're not really that into custom built bikes then why are you reading this thread and making comments

This thread isn't about custom bikes.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes please ^


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 1073
Full Member
Topic starter
 

This thread isn't about custom bikes.

i beg to differ as it is mostly about custom bikes as if you read the thread title, WHICH I STARTED! then you will see these are all custom built bike manufacturers.

well done the STW crew has sucessfully put me off my own thread. congrats you ****ts!


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4006/4548874546_e319c2e63d.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4006/4548874546_e319c2e63d.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/nickw3216/4548874546/ ]FBOTY[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/nickw3216/ ]nick3216[/url], on Flickr

Not custom. Skill compensating (or enhancing?) suspension that worked even Back In The Day. Porn? you decide.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i beg to differ as it is mostly about custom bikes as if you read the thread title

But you also said the were 'porn', which is what people are questioning. If you just wanted pics of branded bikes you could have just done a 'show me your x, y ,z' thread 😆


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:04 pm
Posts: 10194
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

not mine, but I used to have a black and neon pink dave lloyd hmmmmmmm


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 10194
Full Member
 

and a hand made Frank the Welder frame.....you don't get much better pedigree

[img] ?psid=1[/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i beg to differ as it is mostly about custom bikes as if you read the thread title

No need to act like a big girl just because you got the title wrong.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

haggis1978

trying not to be defensive but when you start a thread requesting something in particular and then people start going off on tangents and dragging me with them then it gets to be a bit of a pain.

It's a forum. That's the nature of it.

haggis1978
i just wanted to see some nice bikes that i like and not have to try and justify them which is what i feel like i am having to do.

No one is asking anyone to justify anything, in the grand scheme of things the "bike porn" that's been posted isn't [i]that[/i] expensive, and much of it isn't that nice. Your definition has just inspired debate as to what makes a bike "bike porn", not whether anyone should buy a custom or boutique brand bike. That's all. I posted when I had a look at the thread and it occurred to me there were some pretty bland, even ugly bikes in it, and that my off the shelf full susser would probably be as expensive, faster and more fun on anything other than a fire road. Which got me wondering, and posting.

Imo "bike porn" must surely be something like ( and I mean generally ) the Colnago CF8 or Specialized Mclaren Venge. Ie stupidly expensive, very rare and cutting edge performance. The aesthetics might be marmite but that's not the whole point, they represent bleeding edge performance, form following function and a high degree of unobtainability .

In mtb terms the closest thing would be what?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did you get those wheels for free?

I just like the strength and stiffness of deep section rims/short spokes compared to wider rims. I'll freely admit they are a bit weighty though, especially with Phil Wood hubs. They work really well in deep mud though.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wow.. this went from being quite a nice fun thread to being a bag of ****..

shame on you taste dictators

I'm with Readers Wives.. and even Wayne Rooney when the urge takes me..

one mans Playboy is anothers Razzle and way too often Terry Richardson doesn't even get a look in..

shame on you


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

If some of that lot are porn, is this the Littlewoods catalogue lingerie section?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:28 pm
Posts: 10194
Full Member
 

well said yunki, too much tossery in force on narrow minded track world these days


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:28 pm
Posts: 17771
Full Member
 

yunki - Member
wow.. this went from being quite a nice fun thread to being a bag of ****.

I'm surprised it got as far as it did before it turned into a bag of ****.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:33 pm
 hock
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[u]for a change something nice to say here:[/u]
love that '94 Dave Yates Swamp Donki!
Mighty proportions, wonder if it still rode well!?

Didn't know it before, so that was worth reading through this thread alone.
Despite the fatuous feuds between the interesting posts.

Thanks! 🙂


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yunki

shame on you taste dictators

Who's being a taste dictator? Is it the guys implying a bike has to be a skinny tubed hartail made in a shed with some 90's throwback decals and a 4k price tag before it can be considered sexy?

Or the people questioning that?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

now can someone please tell me about these fake Indy Fabs so i dont end up with one someday?

Sometimes they can look like this...

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:48 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

nick3216 - Member
Ha ha...need to justify your choice? Steve Peat needs skill compensation then?
Ha, your inferiority complex is showing.

At least I have the skills and confidence to make that choice. I don't have to justify it to myself never mind Internet keyboard warriors. And indeed, sometimes I do ride wide bars and longer travel. My world is not black and white.

Steve Peat uses those things to enhance his already not inconsiderable skill. I remember him riding and beating people in a narrow barred Kona hardtail though. What a fatuous non-sequitur you raise.

POSTED 7 HOURS AGO # REPORT-POST

Ha ha, bully for you for having the "skills and confidence" to make that choice 🙄 I didi too with my custom steelHT. My only point was that you were slagging off those with FS, wide bars, etc, now you've backed down to say you love riding yours., but you're still superior because you have the "skill and confidence" to choose/buy something else 😛

Anyway...a Turner Burner "back in the day"?...WTF it came out in 1994, are you some kind of NOO8 ❓


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

blah blah blah ing a taste dictator? Is it the guys implying a bike has to be a skinny tubed hartail made in a shed with some 90's throwblah blah bla

I love you unconditionally


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yunki

I realised I was being a dick and couldn't construct a decent retort so I thought I'd try and be facetious instead.

Fair enough.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:09 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

As the any definition of biek porn, Shirley it can be nothing other than individual?

I mean one man's Asianbabes is another man's GILF weekly?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:18 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

rwc03 - Member
Anybody own a Moots? Always been interested as to how they ride

I owned a Rigormootis many moons ago but found the geometry to be a bit old fashioned.

They have short effective top tube's as standard, for example the 16" which has a 17.27" seat tube only has a 22" effective top tube.

You can get custom geometry, but that is even more £££'s over the standard price.

I think a standard geometry Rigormootis is around £2700.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

muddyfunster - Member
blah blah blah.. stodgily completely missing the point.. blah blah blaaaaaah
Fair enough.

I could construct plenty of retorts Sonny Jim.. but to do so would be the intellectual equivalent of kicking a dog turd down the street..

😐


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thanks Sofaking but I've stopped doing fake IF's now and only deal in fake DeKerfs commonly known as OnOnes 🙂


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:31 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Imo "bike porn" must surely be something like ( and I mean generally ) the Colnago CF8 or Specialized Mclaren Venge. Ie stupidly expensive, very rare and cutting edge performance. The aesthetics might be marmite but that's not the whole point, they represent bleeding edge performance, form following function and a high degree of unobtainability .

+1

Nothing here is at the cutting edge IMO. If you wanted photos of custom bikes and nothing else why not Google the brands in your post? How dare people come and ruin 'your' thread 🙄


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mighty proportions, wonder if it still rode well!?

Only on early 90's style head-down arse-up friendly XC style race courses. There's too much weight over the front end with that Dave Yates stem. A shorter (80mm) Bontrager quill stem has made it a bit more comfortable. Fat belly gets in the way these days too. The brakes were better than the available options at the time, but TBH even V-brakes outperform them.

you're still superior because you have the "skill and confidence" to choose/buy something else

Have you visited a trail centre lately? Some of them need all the help they can get.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:43 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Does this one of mine count?

This is the prototype version of my next bike I think. It will also be custom made.[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


Anybody own a Moots? Always been interested as to how they ride

For me, Moots YBBeautiful riding 😀


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:16 pm
 hock
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As the any definition of biek porn, Shirley it can be nothing other than individual?
I mean one man's Asianbabes is another man's GILF weekly?

so what Al said!!!

There's no accounting for taste, is there? Surely shouldn't!
We could have enjoyed each others interpretation of what bike porn is, without starting to argue about it.
Then again we obviously couldn't. 😐

Sometimes I think it's all about therapy.
Yes, the internet forum culture is one big therapy of being allowed to argue for the arguments sake, being irrational, being provocative, even pretty dastardly 😯 without civilisation and other spoil sports being too much in the way... for once! What an insight! I've got to write a book about it!

Hope it works! The therapy, I mean. For a better tomorrow! 😀


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:03 am
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

or do what I do scroll through and just look at the pics and ignore all the silliness.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 8:44 am
 hock
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or do what I do scroll through and just look at the pics and ignore all the silliness.

but where's the fun in that? 😉


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 9:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've discovered that googling bicycle porn is quite enlightening and definitely NSFW

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 10:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that Raleigh image counts as silliness. the bicycle equivalent of skanky


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

^ Nice Moots!


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 11:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2565/3930592178_f90985a748.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2565/3930592178_f90985a748.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/huntercycles/3930592178/ ]sampson ghost flames[/url]


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 11:47 am
 hock
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've discovered that googling bicycle porn is quite enlightening and definitely NSFW

what? 😯 that's what I'd call selective perception then!

have a look here [url= http://www.mountainbike-magazin.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=451984 ]:-)[/url] as a mild example


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:02 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

This thread now reads like the RBS pay thread. Disappointed as I had hoped to see some nice bikes. Live and let live. Post up whatever you think is bike porn!


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:15 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

Was trying to come up with a classic/modern car analogy,
classic looks, expensive, [i]feel[/i] nice to ride
vs
cheap, more comfy, efficient, better technology

but there's so many holes I can pick in it I shan't bother.

Some nice looking old bikes here (and some complete mingers too)


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:31 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

and another thing, I don't get the towel rail, is it just for show (in which case, OK fair enough) or is there some reasoning behind it - can't see what considering most bike manage with just a top and a down tube, but would like to hear it.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

haggis1978 - Member

This thread isn't about custom bikes.

i beg to differ as it is mostly about custom bikes as if you read the thread title, WHICH I STARTED! then you will see these are all custom built bike manufacturers.

i apologise for including my merlin, then, as i had not appreciated the custom element was a requirement.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:59 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Post up whatever you think is bike porn!

No, that's not allowed! Custom bikes only.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So is Fat Bike Porn like Big Jugs Monthly then?


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 1:38 pm
Posts: 1828
Free Member
 

@SofaKing

Is that Westbury in your pics on the first page?


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 1:40 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

I thought it was worthy flatboy.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thank you, sir. 🙂


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hahaha, wow. so you know, i really was apologising. 😆

anyway, i don't want to take away from one of the best posts i've ever seen. 😀


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd deffo like to see some Potts on here


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

haggis.

Just bear in mind that some of the people on this thread just want to look at pictures of bikes you see leaning agains a wall at a trail centre cafe. 🙂

They have no interest in anything that's not advertised in MBR/MBUK.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://farm1.staticflickr.com/26/48330174_a5388b614c.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm1.staticflickr.com/26/48330174_a5388b614c.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/nickw3216/48330174/ ]Look at that fillet brazing[/url] Deep chain stays and no bridge either.

Choice of paint colour and pattern (or not) is also a personal thing on these sorts of bikes.

I don't get the twin top tube thing myself and I don't expect people to understand my liking of curvy top tubes either.

So I might not buy one, but I can still appreciate the craft that goes into a bike with a "towel rail", and the owners pride.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

christ, there are some really minging bikes on this thread, pretty poor showing for a BILF thread.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so show us something nice then klunk


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:51 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Haha! Post of the day haggis. Chapeau.

I apologise if my comments have upset you, as they clearly have. I have no issue whatsoever with the bikes posted within (a number are very nice), my greatest 'grievance' (for want of a better word) is with your absurd policing of the content.

What exactly have I done that makes me 'jumped up'? - I expressed my opinion in my early posts, which clearly offends, though to be honest you were on the back foot and unnecessarily defensive from the off, as if you expected to counter some resistance (which has not come from me).

If you are going to be so upset when people don't adhere to your rules may I suggest you register CustomBikePhotosAndNaziGovernedForum.com - probably more up your street!


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 2:54 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

so show us something nice then klunk

i don't think i'm allowed, my porn preferences are too run of the mill for the thread police.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:04 pm
Posts: 214
Free Member
 

@SofaKing

Is that Westbury in your pics on the first page?


no mountainous lincolnshire 🙂


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:09 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

This has been interesting.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 12522
Full Member
 

haggis, £2300 for the ti implant frame. £1700 on xt group, decent forks etc easily do-able, I'd have thought. The 853 Team SST is £1100. Add a bit for custom tweaks and you've still got loads of headroom for a sub £4K build.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CustomBikePhotosAndNaziGovernedForum.com -

I call Godwin's Law!


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:52 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Pah, 4k won't even get you a 2nd tier Epic any more - let alone an S-Works!


I call Godwin's Law!

😆


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:54 pm
Posts: 1073
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Right, thank you for the comment of the day remarks. i am a wee bit calmer now 😉 i am not policing the content just wanting to see some nice bikes as suggested in the thread title. more than you njee20 have popped in and said they're ordinary or not bike porn and if you dont like then why are you continuing to write in this thread. its like you are goading me same as the plonker a few comments up who says "these bikes are all minging" so i repeat "jog on!"


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 3:59 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Why am I still here? Because there are some interesting bikes in here (although there's hardly any photos on this page now it's descended into bedlam), and like you I'm not particularly interested in Orange 5s/Cotics/On Ones etc - I appreciate nice bikes, mine doesn't really 'fit' with the STW formula.

What I don't get, and I did say as much, is why people swoon over them so much. They're nice bikes, but all they have over mass produced bikes is exclusivity, ie it's brand snobbery. That's fine, just don't pretend it's owt else!


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 4:04 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

its like you are goading me same as the plonker a few comments up who says "these bikes are all minging" so i repeat "jog on!"

LOL, it would be goading if i actually said that, miss quoted on the same page, outstanding.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 4:08 pm
Posts: 1411
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 4:15 pm
Posts: 12522
Full Member
 

Here's my Dekerf:

[img] [/img]

Not sure how this fits with anyone's idea of bike porn. It's very ordinary to look at, and not that expensive: it's the cheaper Generation, 631, not 853. I bought it second hand, too. (equivalent of finding it in a hegderow and peeling apart the pages?)

And actually, I'm emotionally attached to it more than its ride qualities would justify - there are plenty of better looking bikes out there and plenty more that are nicer to ride, but I love it anyway and I don't want to get rid.

So much more like a long term partner than porn.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 4:17 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

That Cyfac is the best yet, needs Di2, but yes.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 4:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My old DeKerf. Truly loved this bike. The frame is hanging in the garage and i should get round to getting disc tabs welded on.

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, I'll fess up to brand snobbery, not wanting another "me too" bike.

[img] [/img]

In the end I chose a Hunter cos I'd already met Rick, and wanted to give my money to someone I knew rather than a corporation. That and he could do wishbone stays and Black Cat dropouts instead of an EBB or the fugly Paragon sliders.

And this quality of brazing...

[url= http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3145/2588199815_70f08f0a5a.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3145/2588199815_70f08f0a5a.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Edited to add: love that DeKerf above


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that DeKerf Solitaire is very nice


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:34 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

I like my dropouts

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

brakes - Member

so, I've always wanted an Indy Fab Deluxe, but doubt I'll ever buy one.
where do you get the fakes?

I should have one of my fake Indy Fab's up for sale soon.
Keep an eye on the for sale forum over the next week or so.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:46 pm
Posts: 214
Free Member
 

is it ti or steel ?


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's steel.

The guy that builds them hasn't been able to master faking Ti yet.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 5:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ok so I am curious.... rarely get involved in these threads that turn into a bickering match although 'Hock' makes an interesting point re forum mentality etc

I am one of those main stream guys, I run a Zesty, bought before the hype, but I make it work for me rather than ride it as standard and I have an Evil Sov that I put together for winter riding.

What I have discovered is that I love riding the Sov, in the saddle it is ok but once out of it taking on the trails it is fantastic fun..... this has lead me into thinking about a bike that'll pedal better but be as much fun when attacking the trail.

I am now thinking that maybe a custom geometry HT would be good, possibly in Ti....

My thoughts on the bikes posted... most look pretty uninspiring with the odd exception but the thing that counts is the ride.... it is all about the ride and I am a fan of understatement so whilst they look pretty uninspiring I hope that they ride as thier owners had wished them to when designing/ordering them.

I won't post any pics of my main steamers... mostly as I have no idea how to attach an image.

Riding = Smiling


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 6:02 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Most peoples custom rides take elements of 'standard' bikes they really like and recreate them in a posher material with nicer fixtures and fittings.

If you like your hardtail and know what to do to make it ride how you want in that one area without stuffing the rest of it up (or the builder you choose can tell you) then gettign a custom frame made woudl make sense.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 6:04 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 6:40 pm
Page 2 / 3