Forum menu
The start of mounta...
 

[Closed] The start of mountain biking...not in the USA?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No - I invented them back in 1977 in my garage in Formby, Merseyside when I was 11.
Took a 24" wheeled 5 Speed racer - fitted all black tyres, big wide cowhorn handlebars (must have been 800mm), took front the brake off, swapped the forks for some off a 26" wheeled bike. We called them scramblers - good fun riding on the dirt tracks in the Formby Pinewoods.


 
Posted : 29/10/2010 2:34 pm
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

[url= http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g" target="_blank">http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
[url= http://sonic.net/~ckelly/Seekay/mtbwelcome.htm ][b]2retro4u[/b][/url]
Marin County, Cali

The events being discussed here in the abstract are real events that I took part in.

First, the name of the sport comes from the company that Gary Fisher and I started in 1979, MountainBikes, to sell bikes we put together in a rented garage on frames made by Tom Ritchey. It was such a good name, and so descriptive, that it became the generic name for multiple gear bikes with large tyres used for riding on rough surfaces.

About downhill. The Repack series was to my knowledge the first downhill offroad time trials, so we in Marin certainly "invented" that. But before we started racing down hills, we had ridden to the tops of a lot of them also, and we were already riding multiple gear bikes cobbled together from piles of unrelated parts. The beating our bikes took racing downhill helped us design them for the toughness that mountain bikes need in all situations. Cyclocross bikes would have folded like paper clips under that kind of abuse.

While perhaps millions of others rode offroad before Gary Fisher and I did, no one else seems to have had the passion and ability to stake their future on such bikes by starting a company that made only one thing: fat tyre multiple gear bikes like none other then being offered for sale on the planet. Gary and I did, and it seems to have been a good idea. Every mountain bike built before 1984 was copied directly from the one we introduced.

Click my photo above to see my website.


 
Posted : 01/11/2010 5:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

tree-magnet
Nope. The name "Mountain bike" was initialy applied to one product. I forget who it was now, I think Ritchey.

Oops, I meant Charlie Kelly and Gary Fisher then! 😛


 
Posted : 01/11/2010 5:12 am
Posts: 91
Free Member
 

I wondered when Charlie would find this thread?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/11/2010 8:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Every mountain bike built before 1984 was copied directly from the one we introduced".

This depends on the exact definition of mountain bike. I can think of a number of pre 1984 bikes, specifically designed for the enjoyment of riding off-road, that have no evolutionary connection to the bikes designed by Joe breeze, Charlie Kelly, Gary fisher et al.

*The bikes of the Velo Cross Club Parisien (VCCP)1951-56

*The 1953 "Woodsie" bike built by John Finley Scott.

*Rodney Rom's 1966 bike built in Cincinnati, Ohio ("The City of Seven Hills"), in the spring of 1966 by widening the rear of a new 10-speed Schwinn Varsity Tourist frame.

*Geoff Apps of England and his first off-road bike of 1966, based on a Raleigh Explorer frame.

*Russ Mahon bike of 1973 Cupertino, California

*Bob Crispin's bike Built in Spokane, Washington in the spring of 1974, for riding in the snow.

British Frame builders Jack Taylor built to order specialist "RoughStuff bikes" in the mid to late 1970's.

*Britain's Geoff Apps and his late 1970's Range-Rider and early 80's Cleland Aventura bikes.(from 1982-84 he formed Cleland Cycles, the first manufacturer of off-road bikes in Europe).

However it was not these bikes that started the global phenomenon we call mountain biking, but those designed by Joe breeze, Charlie Kelly, Gary fisher, Tom Ritchey and Mert Lawwill.

For those interested in the British connection, here's a 1979 article on Geoff Apps' Range-Rider bikes.
[img] [/img]

[url= http://clelandcycles.wordpress.com/press/ ]Bicycle Times 1979, larger version.[/url]


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 12:38 am
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

[url= http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g" target="_blank">http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
[url= http://sonic.net/~ckelly/Seekay/mtbwelcome.htm ][b]2retro4u[/b][/url]
Marin County, Cali

I am aware of all those previous off-road designs. Somehow none of them took over the world. Our bikes did.

None of the examples you gave was described as a "mountain bike," the common name that came into use in the '80s to describe a fat-tyre, multiple gear, diamond frame bike. The name itself came from the bike Gary and I sold, which was called simply, the "MountainBike." When the design was copied the name went with it.

Following Specialized and Univega, who introduced copies of the Ritchey MountainBike in 1982, every major manufacturer used the design elements we introduced for their first off-road products.

This is not something I read about somewhere. This is something I took part in.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 4:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The start of mountain biking...not in the USA?

[b]Here's my take on this question.[/b]

Riding off-road is as old as the bicycle itself as when it was first invented their were very few roads to be ridden. When roads became more common, riding off-road was generally regarded as a necessary evil as it was slow and relatively uncomfortable.

Riding off-road as a pass-time is probably a British idea that started when town dwellers cycled out to explore the surrounding countryside. They rode their everyday road bikes as far as they could and then got off, pushed or carried their bikes in order to make it through the the hills and mountains to their destination. This activity became known as "pass storming" and extreme examples of such activities were sometimes reported in Victorian and early 20th Century newspapers. In 1955 the Rough Stuff Fellowship was formed, though rough-stuff riding had been a popular occasional activity for some road-riders for many years previous to this. The attitude amongst most rough-stuff riders was that riding off-road was a challenge and a difficulty to be overcome. It was not seen as something to be enjoyed and reveled in, and so it didn't matter whether they rode or walked the terrain, so bikes largely remained unmodified. Very few specialist bikes were designed and made for rough-stuffing.

Riding off-road for sport starts with Cyclo-cross with the first Championships being held in France in 1902. Though this shares the rough-stuff concept of dismounting to tackle difficult terrain and again the bikes were largely unchanged from road bikes. The French VCCP in 1951 developed a sport similar to mountain biking that involved custom made bikes and components, but it died out around 1955. Several other individuals and groups also developed and built bicycles intended specifically for enjoying off-road riding during the 50's, 60's and 70's. However these machines never developed beyond their immediate spheres of influence. The machines produced in late 1970's Marin County California in connection with the "Repack" down hill races, were in the right place at the right time and led directly to the global activity known as mountain biking.

The earlier designs of off-road bicycle that I mentioned in my previous post, mostly died out. Though John Finlay Scott was influential and supported the Marin pioneers financialy, the evidence suggests that the pioneers developed their own independent ideas, and did not copy his design. [url= http://triplecrankset.blogspot.com/2008/09/late-professor-jf-scott-to-be-inducted.html ]John Finlay Scott link[/url]

The only non-Marin lineage of off-road bike that has just about survived is the type invented in Britain by Geoff Apps. When Apps' company Cleland Cycles stopped trading in late 1984, versions continued to be made by English Cycles and Highpath Engineering. Over the years, Apps and a small group of enthusiasts have continued to use and develop this style of bike. Various modern versions exist. One 29er version is currently being designed and will be going into production in the near future.
[url= http://clelandcycles.wordpress.com/pre-order/ ]Modern Cleland 29er link[/url]


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 1:27 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Ace stuff that. SImilar thread here on UKCyclocross http://www.ukcyclocross.com/forum/topics/it-was-harder-in-the-old-days


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 10:38 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

The Cleland stuff is interesting. Has anyone on here got one?

Also interesting that Brant gets a name check re a possible limited frame production run.


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 10:54 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

This is not something I read about somewhere. This is something I took part in.

I don't think there's any doubt about that! 😀
It's certain that what you guys came up with (The bikes, the races, and IMO the attitude) is the most important and defining step on the ladder to what we now call 'mountian biking.' You'd have to be foolish to question that! 🙂

But I don't think it was the first step. People all over the world rode bikes off road before that, in one way or another, and the seed was already sown. It's like making fire: Heat, fuel and oxygen all existed before someone worked out how to combine them and tame them!


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 11:01 am
Posts: 1305
Free Member
 

Interesting thread this, and a great film. Took me a while to realise that the "commentary" was added after- esp as he kept going on about the guy having had a kidney transplant. Interesting bit of trivia about the chap that worked on the cheese counter at the co-op as well- you wouldn't get that sort of knowledge on the BBC!
As far as the birth of mountain biking is concerned, it seems we were all doing the same sort of things with existing frames in order to have some fun on them off road before the "mountain bike" was invented.
Our preferred customization was to start with a racer frame out of a skip, slap some cow horns on and a 20" wheel off a raliegh grifter on the back. We used to cobble together some sort of mechanism to hold the caliper brake in the right place relative to the rim. The three speed sturmey archer hub would be kept in the lowest ratio permananently somehow. We would go to a local field with a WW2 bomb crater in it and do what would now be described as dirt jumping. The frames would snap near the head tube.
This was 81-82ish when I was 11 or 12.
At that time I remember BMXs appearing in the uk. I used to do schoolboy moto-x so lots of the lads that did that had BMX bikes before it became very mainstream.
I even remember seeing a BMX with a rear derailleur- that didn't catch on.
Within a couple of years you could get the raliegh bomber the rest is history.
We had no idea that these new fangled mountain bikes were "invented" by americans, we just knew they looked like the sort of bikes that we wanted to ride, and had been trying to make ourselves.


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Woody
The Cleland stuff is interesting. Has anyone on here got one?

The reason why I picked up this thread is that I Googled "Geoff Apps" to find out what people are saying about his new bike design. I have known Geoff since 1984 and am currently involved in component R&D and testing for the new bikes. I own two Apps designed bikes, a 1983 Cleland Aventura and a 1988 version made by Highpath Engineering. I have also developed my own modern full suspension variants. I know, have known, and am in contact with the owners of many Apps inspired bikes.

[b]Here's an interesting RetroBike thread from someone who is restoring a Highpath made bike that was found abandoned in a stairwell.
[/b]
[url= http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112627&highlight=cleland ]Highpath' Cleland restoration[/url]


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Mudrider

Thanks for link, great thread and really interesting stuff. I'm quite embarrassed that I'd never heard of the make(s) or Mr Apps prior to this thread 😳

Riding position looks very interesting as do a lot of the other ideas, Cheers


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 11:21 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

Following Specialized and Univega

Are univega that old i always thought they were relatively new.


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 11:25 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

I'm interested to know what Charlie Kelly recalls of the Cupertino Riders. I've read a few magazine articles about them, it's said that they very briefly appeared at races with interestingly redesigned bikes and some ideas were taken onboard by the people credited with starting the sport as we know it. Or, were their bikes with alterations not any different to what you and your friends were riding and redesigning?.


 
Posted : 05/11/2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

[url= http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g" target="_blank">http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
[url= http://sonic.net/~ckelly/Seekay/mtbwelcome.htm ][b]2retro4u[/b][/url]
Marin County, Cali

I'm interested to know what Charlie Kelly recalls of the Cupertino Riders.

I remembered seeing them in the winter of 1974 when they appeared for the only time on our radar screen. These guys were just like us, hippies modifying bikes for off-road, and they were ahead of us technologically because we hadn't yet figured out how to get derailleur gears onto our old Schwinns.

The answer was a drum brake, then made primarily for tandems and not something you saw very often. The Cupertino boyz had Atom drums and derailleur gears, and we paid attention. A few months later, Gary spotted a disassembled tandem at a flea market, and he bought it for 20 bucks or so. He threw away everything but the five pound rear drum brake hub, which he laced into a 26" wheel.

It was superior immediately. As soon as we figured out how to get them, we started ordering Atom hubs through either the Mill Valley Schwinn shop or The Cove, where the Koski brothers worked. The distributor noticed that so many of these obscure tandem parts were going to a tiny area, and wanted to know why.

After Gary and I had the MountainBikes business rolling, someone from the Cupertino gang wrote and mentioned that they had been into this offroad stuff some time earlier. I sent Russ Mahon a letter on MountainBikes company stationery, in which I freely acknowledged that they had given us an important piece of our developing technology. Russ still has that letter.

I have no problem acknowledging the many riders who went offroad before I ever rode a bicycle. But until the Ritchey MountainBike appeared on the market in 1979, you would have had to make your own. There was nothing on earth like the MountainBike for sale to the public, and a few years later, half the bikes sold worldwide were copied directly from it. Not from the Cleland or the Highpath, sorry to say.

It was our unique competition that drove our technology, and there was none of that downhill foolishness in England. I dare anyone to show me a downhill offroad time trial before Repack in October 1976. We DEFINITELY invented downhill racing.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 12:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

tails

Are univega that old i always thought they were relatively new.

Yes. The Univega brand goes back to 1982. The following link gives some details.

[url= http://www.completesite.com/mbhof/page.cfm?pageid=13 ]History of US all-terrain cycling - Mountain Bike Hall of Fame[/url]


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 12:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Repoack rider
We DEFINITELY invented downhill racing.

Certainly did. In the UK was a parallel cross county non competitive cycling.

I still maintain mountainbiking was a series of developments - after all the repack bikes of the late 70 s were not that close to what we ride today


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 9:05 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

after all the
repack bikes of the late 70 s were not that close to what we ride today

eh? There's 33 years of evolution between them. It's not even a valid comparison...please don't tell me you think modern bikes evolved from something else?

Nothing else at that time was closer - able to go up and down equally well.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 9:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

exactly al - it s a process of development That was one significant point on the way.

Not as you claimed

cynic-al - Member

I'd say mountainbikes as we know them were invented in the USA in the late 70s.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 9:34 am
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I love this thread. Really enjoying the debate.

I love the fact that throughout time there have been people who take what is there and adapt it to suit their new purpose. There are always a lot of contributing factors required to transform that personal adaptation into something that has long-term, worldwide impact. That's what happened in Marin in the late 70s: the people, the hills, the economy, the industry, the old bikes, the vibe, the weather... etc.

I'm bloody glad it did too. Otherwise I would be a roadie.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am enjoying the thread too. I'm glad that there are so many different materials, colours, configurations, styles and components and that you get to mix and match these into bike that you love and which suits your riding. It's interesting and fun.

All bikes are good bikes <HEART/>

(Wow, I AM in a good mood this morning! lol)


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a mountain bike.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:02 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TJ that was THE significant point along the way-from which the bikes we ride developed.

I don't really know what you are trying to say any more as its completely inconsistent. What I have said is the same throughout.

Stop making it personal.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Repack Rider - Member

None of the examples you gave was described as a "mountain bike," the common name that came into use in the '80s to describe a fat-tyre, multiple gear, diamond frame bike. The name itself came from the bike Gary and I sold, which was called simply, the "MountainBike." When the design was copied the name went with it.

Ah - the Anglophile argument. Since most other countries use a different language, none of them could have "invented" the mountain bike.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:48 am
 mrmo
Posts: 10720
Free Member
 

Ah - the Anglophile argument. Since most other countries use a different language, none of them could have "invented" the mountain bike.

You can say it is an anglophone argument, but apart from the france, mtb is common parlance to describe a type of bike.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 17395
Full Member
 

What I find interesting is that my 29er with drop bars looks very similar to the path racer ridden by one of my family in 1910 right down to the single gear. His tyres look like 2" on 28" rims. The geometry is similar, but they used bigger frame sizes then. His was fixed though 🙂

I know it was ridden up mountain paths - he supposedly went up Ben Wyvis - and he wasn't the only one doing it locally.

However I think it's fair to say that USA marketing has given us the "classic" 26" fat tyred geared bike with suspension that is called a mountainbike - an abomination for frail and feeble people who cannot ride a proper bike or for fat boys to roll downhill on.

There is no doubt of the superiority of a proper bike - a rigid 29er with drop bars (where's that Hitler youtube clip when you need it)
.
.
.
.
OK now I'll duck back under the bridge 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

thing is none of us would be riding mountainbikes with singlespeeds without the mountainbikes of the 70s.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Right - info please. In the 60s my mum used to go out on a Raleigh hub 3 spd, with sarnies, flask, fags, rods and up the riverside and all over Forestry Commission and farm land on a regular basis. Is it the fact that she rode a shopper or that she's never been on the internet that means she wasn't a mountain biker..................

I also can't help feeling that modern mountain bikes owe more to motorcycle design and development than any form of rigid bike and the derailleur is older than anybody on here........

*Riding offroad is what people did when they worked in the countryside before cars were commonly available.

"We DEFINITELY invented downhill racing. ", so until you invented it what was two people trying to beat each other down hill called ?

Ps I think you should all be jumping up and down for joy, during 'our' (well some of us) lifetimes we've had a gifted 'leisure existence'
- dirt motorcycling - from heavy with poxy drum brakes and twin shock, to mega power, lightweight, mega travel and discs.
- windsurfing - lumps with baggy sails and rope tie on booms to carbon, lightweight, battens and clamps.
- mountain biking - already covered
- kites - my first one was bamboo and canvas
- jetskis
- ............


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kirkpatrick MacMillan invented the off road bike. Simply because he invented the bike and around that time the roads were pretty gash.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, to summarise; Repack and his mates coined a marketing concept in the name 'mountain bikes', Mike Sinyard then commercialised it effectively by mass-producing off-road 'mountain' bikes, and Shimano etc made loads of bits to make off-road cycling easier and more efficient.

My mum told me about a conversation she'd had, in the early 60's, with an Italian bloke who explained how he and some friends had adapted standard bikes by using fatter tyres and upright handlebars, which they then rode 'off-road'. So of course others were doing what Repack and his mates were, and doing it earlier. What Repack etc have given us is the lifestyle concept. The put a name to an activity which others had been doing anyway, and one which fitted perfectly in terms of producing a marketable concept.

Good stuff, nice one, but Repack no more 'invented' mountain biking than Clive Sinclair 'invented' the computer...


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dozy forum...


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

Kirkpatrick MacMillan invented the off road bike.

Indeed, roads were no more than bridleways.

However, I have no doubts as to whom my MTB bikes Grandaddy is:
[IMG] [/IMG]
My 1979 Huffy Good Vibrations cruiser, with pefectly fitting trails rims, Kenda Nevegals 2.1 Stick-E and Gusset bar.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

druidh...
"Ah - the Anglophile argument. Since most other countries use a different language, none of them could have "invented" the mountain bike".

mrmo...
"You can say it is an anglophone argument, but apart from the france, mtb is common parlance to describe a type of bike".

When first introduced into Britain many manufacturers used the acronym ATB (All Terrain Bicycle) to describe their bikes. For instance the first British made mass produced bikes, the Ritchey copies produced by Saracen, were marketed as The Saracen ATB. However, the American aspirational term mountain bike, caught the public imagination to become the preferred title for off-road oriented bikes.

Alternatively the logical French the adopted the equivalent of ATB, Velo Tout Terrain, VTT. This is a description that covers any bicycle designed to be used on all terrain, and so could readily be applied to the bike of Kirkpatrick MacMillan. Only when roads improved were bikes designed that were intended for road use only.

Even though others claim to have used the term "mountain bike" earlier, it was the title that Fisher and Kelly attached to their bikes and in the main, went with the bikes when they went global. So the term "mountain bike" is connected with Marin and the repack style down-mountain racing against the clock. The French VCCP took a more motor cross approach whilst in both France and Britain there developed the Cyclo-cross tradition. Britain also had the two different off-road touring approaches of the RoughStuff fellowship, who were happy to get off and walk, and Geoff Apps who thought of having to walk as being beaten by the terrain.

These activities all differ and each had developed their own style of bicycle. Their was no single invention. After the Marin mountain bikes went global, owners and manufacturers started modifying them for their own uses. Long may the invention continue!

This process continues but is mainly sport led. This has resulted in a sporting bias in off-road bike design and fashion. One result of this is that many riders prefer to get wet than use mudguards when riding in the rain. I personally believe that there is scope for a more practical approach to off-road bicycle design. But even after all the years of bike development, this remains an area that has not been explored commercially.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This process continues but is mainly sport led. This has resulted in a sporting bias in off-road bike design and fashion. One result of this is that many riders prefer to get wet than use mudguards when riding in the rain. I personally believe that there is scope for a more practical approach to off-road bicycle design. But even after all the years of bike development, this remains an area that has not been explored commercially.

Yes the current crop of "all mountain" or "trail" bikes are quite clearly race led. 6 inch travel all day bikes and baggy shorts quite clearly fit the criteria for most that you have laid down.

Oh, and as above, DH racing and the term "mountain biking" were invented by the repackers. Off roading wasn't, but then that's like arguing who invented walking.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

but then that's like arguing who invented walking.

I think you'll find that was Edward Whymper and friends, in the 1860s.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

[url= http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g" target="_blank">http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
[url= http://sonic.net/~ckelly/Seekay/mtbwelcome.htm ][b]2retro4u[/b][/url]
Marin County, Cali

"We DEFINITELY invented downhill racing. ", so until you invented it what was two people trying to beat each other down hill called ?

Where are the records, and who was the champion? We did all that, and we found that on a narrow and steep road where the good line is a foot wide, it's impossible or dangerous to pass another rider.

So we figured out how to run downhill races as time trials, which is the way most of them are run today, and we wrote down the results. Repack was a series, with records kept and winners awarded prizes. I still have the records of all but the first race. Two people racing each other down a hill does not leave a record or decide a champion.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have another straw to clutch at...
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, when out with mum (*Raleigh 3 speed shopper, previous post)) and me on a tricycle (*therefore about 1963) whilst not racing and going up hill next to a river (*river was going downhill but as it was on it's own it couldn't possible be racing) I'm proud to say that seeing a large salmon in a pool my mum whipped her tights off and stuffed it down one of the legs. I therefore wish to claim that my mum invented fish net tights.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

[url= http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g" target="_blank">http://i419.photobucket.com/albums/pp271/repackrider/avatar235.jp g"/> [/IMG][/url]
[url= http://sonic.net/~ckelly/Seekay/mtbwelcome.htm ][b]2retro4u[/b][/url]
Marin County, Cali

Sure, lots of people put together bikes for off-road before we started in California, and many used similar elements. But you couldn't go to a bike shop and buy one, and the participants might have numbered in the dozens.

There was nothing on the market like the Ritchey MountainBike before Gary and I introduced it. A few years later most of the bikes being sold looked just like it, and an entire competitive sport had grown from some crazy downhill races. As much as the others who rode similar bikes shared our passion, how many quit their jobs and staked their future on such bikes by opening a company to produce them?

In 1983 a few of us got together and wrote some racing rules and bought insurance so we could compete openly. We called our organization the National Off-Road Bicycle Association, or NORBA. The rules we wrote became the international rules later on.

1983.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 4:39 pm
Posts: 17395
Full Member
 

I've had a bit of fun stirring in this thread but I think we should separate the concept of riding bikes in the mountains from "mountainbiking".

It's fair to say that the term "Mountainbike" should be credited to the USA (Mr Repack & associates), and I remember how pleased I was that I was able to finally be able to buy a bike that I wanted without having to modify it. It certainly was USA style merchandising which popularised it.

Unfortunately the emphasis on road sports was leading European biking up an evolutionary dead end as far as offroad bikes were concerned - blame the dead hand of the UCI which kills every technological advance. An offroad bike was a cyclocross bike with 32mm tyres.

What I always wanted was a lightweight bike with decent sized wheels and tyres. 26" was too small, but at least they came with 2" tyres which had all but disappeared from sale for larger wheels by then. The use intended for my bikes was always mountain. Often on my shoulder and straight up the hill if there was no track visible, so lightness was important, hence singlespeed. Thanks to the mountainbike concept the path racer has been re-invented (only now we call it a 29er) so I am grateful to Mr Repack for that.

But why oh why are mountainbikes fitted with a gearchange system which is guaranteed to be ripped off or bent if you ride it off track? (eg through heather) Just one more step to go...

(Yes I am a member of the RSF)


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's Joe Breeze talking about the origins of the mountain bike and mountain biking. He made Breezer No1 in 1977, which is widely regarded as the first mountain bike built around a purpose built frame. He talks about the importance of "critical mass" in developing the popularity of the new sport.

[url=

Breeze on the origins of mountainbiking[/url]

Given enough time Geoff Apps' ideas could have also developed "critical mass". However in comparison to Americans, the British cycling establishment was extremely conservative. The letter at the end of this link gives a flavor of the many setbacks that Apps encountered whilst promoting his ideas in Britain.

[url= http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=42540&start=165 ]Letter from Dawes to Geoff Apps at end of link[/url]


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 10:58 pm
Posts: 91
Free Member
 

Great clip.


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's clear that repack and co. invented moutainbiking and its image. The only argument is who invented VTT?


 
Posted : 06/11/2010 11:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Every mountain bike built before 1984 was copied directly from the one we introduced.

What happened in 1984? What bike was it that didn't look like the 'original' mountain bike?


 
Posted : 07/11/2010 10:50 pm
Page 3 / 4