Stack and Reach com...
 

[Closed] Stack and Reach comparison tool

11 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
161 Views
Posts: 14461
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm looking for a comparison tool/site to compare some frames/bikes.
Anyone got a link to an easy to use online tool?


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 6:28 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

[url= https://geometrygeeks.bike/bike/bird-aeris-145-2017-1/ ]The only one I know of[/url]


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 6:39 am
Posts: 14461
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thanks


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 7:06 am
Posts: 11402
Full Member
 

Another [url= http://yojimg.net/bike/web_tools/stem.php ]one here that shows an overlay of stem height/length differences[/url]


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 7:53 am
Posts: 4747
Full Member
 

The only one I know of

Link not working for me?


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 9:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its a total minefield as bike companies often dont compare like for like, with different length forks to what are specified or not telling you if they are using sagged suspension. I use an [url= http://gearinches.com/blog/misc/bike-geometry-comparator ]excel tool[/url] and compare each bike manually, adjusting as required to understand what the real differences are.


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 9:34 am
Posts: 11644
Full Member
 

I've been doing this recently, it's a disaster as some take stack to top of headset, some state stack "assuming 15mm spacer" and some show diagrams with stack taken to the top of the stem clamp (which therefore also includes some arbitrary number of spacers, not stated).

Reach seems a little more standard, although even then one manufacturer states "assuming 100mm stem" (although at least they state it, and subtracting 100mm from the figure wasn't too much of a struggle...).


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 9:44 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@granny_ring try https://geometrygeeks.bike/


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 10:15 am
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

@13thfloormonk yeah I bet it is a mare. Given stack and reach both use a fixed (the same fixed) point to measure to you wonder why so many bike companies get it wrong... or is it deliberate?


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 10:16 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

http://www.bikegeo.net/

Allows you to compare different bikes easily by putting in your own figures. Also shows that having bars in the same position from the floor makes more sense of manufacturers reach figures and bikes with big differences on charts end up being very similar when you take account of your normal bar height set up.


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 10:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Given stack and reach both use a fixed (the same fixed) point to measure to you wonder why so many bike companies get it wrong... or is it deliberate?
Some are just outright lies and once you plug all the supplied numbers in to a spreadsheet, nothing lines up.


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah a good example is the new Rocky Mountain Slayer - the reach numbers are around the same as my Reign - however its a fair bit longer than it appears to be on paper because of the massively long headtube.


 
Posted : 11/04/2017 11:33 am