show me your lightw...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] show me your lightweight fs bikes [please]

128 Posts
61 Users
0 Reactions
283 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

at the risk of getting banned from this forum - my wallet finger is getting twitchy and i'm looking for a new frame. the more "exotic" the better but I'm particularly interested to see any nicolai, santa cruz and yeti xc racers


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 8:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't call it a racer, but it's a Santa Cruz, it's full-sus and it's reasonably light weight

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 8:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is mine:

[img] [/img]

It's not that light (really needs lighter wheels) at a bit over 24lbs (actual weighed with pedals, not calculated) and also not exactly exotic. It actually climbs like a lighter bike (better than my hardtail which is a bit lighter) though - it's always seems to need a gear or two higher than my other bikes.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 8:51 pm
 olie
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Steve,

Thats a really great pic


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 9:04 pm
Posts: 417
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Not quite sure of the weight but feels light enough for a 140mm travel bike.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 9:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

here's mine epicsteve but i can't match the quality of your picture

druidh - what model/year is santacruz that looks sharp.

shredder - did you build this up from a frame, how do you like it, how does it compare to other bikes you've owned?


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Santa Cruz, Whats the weight???? VERY NICE BIKE!!!!! 😀


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The SC is a Blur XC Carbon - it was built up last July.

Weight? Depends which scales you use. The ones in the shoppe reckoned 23.5lbs. At home, it worked out at 24.3lbs. Given that there's nothing particularly lardy on it, it does make me giggle at some of the bike weights quoted on here.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My version of lightish weight:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:17 pm
Posts: 417
Free Member
 

Yes built it up from a frame only find it superb feels very very solid and planted. And I know it's said so many times but it climbs brilliantly. Other bikes ive owned being HL Turner 5 spot, Scott Spark 10. Its a keeper for a good while yet.
[img] [/img]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about a Storck - they're pretty exotic, I've only ever seen one on the roof of a car in Edinburgh.

I've got an Ellsworth Truth that is a fairly light frame, but built with Pace RC39s and a mish mash of components still comes in at about 30lbs. My sprinkling of carbon parts and light tyres failing to offset dx636 pedals and an lx chainset. I'm with druidh, some claimed weights are laughable.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:23 pm
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you liking the ibis better than the five oxnop?


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:24 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Love druid's Blur and also the Mojo 8)


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I really need to get a photo of it "in the wild"


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you liking the ibis better than the five oxnop?

And more than the trance, rc405, titus, alpitude, stumpy fsr, chameleon, five etc etc

i've got a day off work tom just so I can get another ride in before the weekend! sarah is now mad that she got rid of hers to get a LT2!

You liking the Pig?


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i tried a spark before i bought the epic but couldn't find a nice one for the right money.

+1 with cinnamon_girl about the sc


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pipe down epicsteve - you'll make me regret selling my epic frame and going hardtail this season!


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:32 pm
 taka
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeh from what ive ridden on it anyways wanting a black one now to put more bling on it 🙁 hopefully going up ragley woods on saturday afternoon to have a go


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can't get one of these anymore, and it's a rubbish photo (really must get a better one - quite a few bits have changed as well), but this is only 21.5lbs including pedals etc.
[IMG] [/IMG]
Cue the naysayers who don't believe you can build a useable bike that light, because theirs isn't. Though there are at least two on this forum with lighter FS bikes.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 10:45 pm
Posts: 2742
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

Not sure what it weighs but it rides light.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i love the straight lines of the asr frame

i think i'm too old for the "organic" curves of frames like the mojo and mine which is probably why i'm getting cold feet. still interested to hear from any nicolai owners to get their view but that's going to have to wait 'til tomorrow now. thanks all.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 11:26 pm
Posts: 8947
Free Member
 

19 and a bit pounds. I like it.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is that really an aero seatpost on there? eeek!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 1:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

19 and a bit pounds.

Wow! No obvious signs of anything really silly on there either - unless those chainrings are carbon? I'm just trying to work out where it's saving over 2lbs on mine (I don't think there's anything to choose between the frame weights).


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 1:52 am
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Very impressive if it is that light - but I'm guessing real world low 20's


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

xl size and 160 forks, still below 28lbs pretty chuft

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:34 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

here is mine...
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:52 am
Posts: 2742
Free Member
 

SSBonty - Member
is that really an aero seatpost on there? eeek!

That' actually part of the frame - you simply cut 'em to size. It can be removed & replaced by a 'normal' seatpost but folk generally don't bother.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 8:10 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

Here's mine, love it:
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 8:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Under 22lbs or so is definitely do-able - just expensive. Going by the actual weights of my bikes though I think a lot of claims for very light weights are likely to be inaccurate and/or without pedals etc.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 8:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] http://www.flickr.com/photos/39979369@N03/3675163324/ [/img]

27lbs. Lovely bike, more travel tan I need to be honest, might switch to a Blur XC carbon if I can scrape the pennies together.

(Anyone tell me why I cant post piccies anymore? Used to work)


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 8:48 am
Posts: 2365
Free Member
 

Love mine...

[IMG] [/IMG]

No idea what it weighs, but it isn't very much!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:09 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I'll have one like Nobby's please.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:25 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

19 and a bit pounds.

Really Andy? What have you changed since I weighed it at Sherwood last year, it's lost about 3lbs!

This was a bit over 21lbs with the mud tyres. Now got a SID fork and a New Ultimate seatpost to drop some weight, should be 20lbs once it's not got some nicer tyres on it!

[img] http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=11c2bt&outx=800&quality=70 [/img]

Dougal's MSC is light!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:26 am
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

this was pretty light but swapped it for a 5spot now
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:27 am
Posts: 4451
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

25 and a bit with mudguards, bar-ends, computer and pedals.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

what lucky people we are that we can own all these lovely bikes. the op was written to avoid pics of dh bikes - not so much about the individual weights of bikes allthough this is intersting to see. at 15 stone the difference between my bike at 26-28lbs and the weight of andrewh's lovely yeti above is a decent steak dinner with a few pints to follow. i'm not the sort to eat fish/brown rice/water every day of the week but we all have our cross to bear.

i'm sure there's more to come - m


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 9:54 am
 lord
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

juan what weight is the switch ? cheers


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure how light my mojo is but with full XTR build it comes up pretty light

[img] ?t=1251301480[/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 10:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

at 15 stone the difference between my bike at 26-28lbs and the weight of andrewh's lovely yeti above is a decent steak dinner with a few pints to follow

I'm heavier than you but despite that I find the weight difference between my bikes quite noticeable on the climbs. Of course some of that might be geometry rather than weight, however when I rebuilt my Epic with a couple of pounds knocked off the weight (mostly forks and tyres) I also found that quite noticeable.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

mrmojo - respect for that colour, looks like kawazaki green.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ibis named it "Nuclear Pesto" 😯


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve - Member

at 15 stone the difference between my bike at 26-28lbs and the weight of andrewh's lovely yeti above is a decent steak dinner with a few pints to follow

I'll never understand that logic it's all relative, just because 'you' are heavy a lighter bike will still feel like and handle like a lighter bike.

Another example of this skewed logic applied to lightweight bikes is when people say 'I'd like to know how much it weighs when it's covered in in 3Ibs of mud'.

Bizzare.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

kingtut -
i have never ridden a sub 20lb bike whether covered in mud or not so i can't affirm or otherwise the difference 10 lbs makes to a bikes weight. i find it interesting that ppl get hung up on the weight of components when they themselves [me included] could do with losing a few pounds. i guess however if i had the cash i'd have everything xx or xtr and not give a sh*t what other people think.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

p.s. why can't i post winking faces???


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:15 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I know a lot of people on here posting light bikes, Andy, myself, Aracer, Dougal, are all pretty serious racers not carrying [b]much [/b]of a paunch around! Dougal disappears if he turns sideways on!

Agree with people who buy a 6" travel bike and then fit silly XC parts though, that's just daft, if you want a longer travel bike, fit parts to suit! IMO of course.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i find it interesting that ppl get hung up on the weight of components when they themselves [me included] could do with losing a few pounds

Fair point, my best upgrade was losing a couple of stone. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know a lot of people on here posting light bikes, Andy, myself, Aracer, Dougal, are all pretty serious racers not carrying much of a paunch around

I was going to say something similar, with the caveat that that was the case for me when I got that bike, and when I was racing it seriously rather than right now (not like I'm fat, just need to lose a stone to get back to my racing weight!) Of course I have the added justification that some of the events I do I carry the bike for significant distances, in which case weight on the bike is far more important than weight on me.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 11:45 am
Posts: 904
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

My SantaCruz superlight, no mudguard and same tyre color at the front and at the back. Almost descent for a MTB magazine picture.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

njee, aracer, i don't stand much chance of ever fitting in to the "whippet" category of cylcing let alone racing. even if i win the lottery and employ a personal trainer i enjoy food and exercise too much so it's a balancing act for me. the reason for op was because i wondered what bikes there are out there that look sharper than what i have - from a vanity perspective. not with the aim of building something inapproporiate that will only last a few weeks between rebuilds because it is built to save weight or that is designed not to break when you throw yourself off a proper mountain [they are a bit thin on the ground here in the thames valley].

still no nicolai - shoud i be reading something in to that - good or bad?


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 2:53 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

They don't make light bikes!

A lot of brands more major than them are missing from this thread!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 3:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are you planning on doing any racing on this new frame then?


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 3:57 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

is dougal still on yon msc thing?


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 3:59 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Think he's getting a new one for this season, but yes AFAIK.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

scottishbadger - Member

Are you planning on doing any racing on this new frame then?

i want to start racing this year but think i need to get fitter/faster before i start. i've had too many years off to expect to be fit in the blink of an eye.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:11 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Plenty of people race without being fit, give it a punt and see what happens!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:14 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

i have two wee bairns and shag all time to train and i still race.
just love the vibe to be honest.just get some fast mates so you can worm your way onto a podium in the team events 😉


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 124
Free Member
 

Dad's bike I built for him this christmas (front brake not fitted - missing adaptor at time of pic)
He is no racer but wanted something to help him up the hills 😉

[img] [/img]

Mine.. not far off weight wise to his but will prob race on my HT more this year..

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:17 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

It weighs what it weighs...


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Lightest FS I've owned, 28lb with heavy DH bars, heavy DH seatpost, D521 rim rear and Random heavy deep section front, and good old coil-oil bombers.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thebikechain - Member

It weighs what it weighs...

That front mech looks a bit lardy for such a light frame. Looks like the whole thing has been done on a budget.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

It weighs what it weighs...

That's rather the attitude I'd adopt with a bike of that ilk, well done.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like oxnop's ibis. Those white 5.1s (and fork) and a dark frame look good. Not decided whether the red goes with the dark gray though

" I'm just trying to work out where it's saving over 2lbs on mine "

lack of bar ends
lack of speedometer
lack of saddlebag (though I assume that comes off for 'weigh ins')
lack of extra stickers
It looks like it has those Alex Scandium rims on?
Integrated seatmast
Much smaller shock, no remote lever
Smaller/narrower tyres
It looks to brand spanking new, so no mud (or grease?) whatsoever

Maybe not 2lbs, but some way toward it?

"heavy DH bars, heavy DH seatpost, D521 rim rear and Random heavy deep section front, and good old coil-oil bombers"
On an NRS? Aren't/weren't they XC (race) bikes?

"Looks like the whole thing has been done on a budget"
What, of about £4k? (RRP)


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

james - Member

> "Looks like the whole thing has been done on a budget"

What, of about £4k?

Bit of an in-joke.....


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:49 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Oi - nothing wrong with a SRAM Xgen - it works well and i have had a good life out of it.

Njee20 - me n you are Pilgrims.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's mine - Santa Cruz - I haven't weighed it properly yet (as I can't carry it far with broken foot!), but with a mate hold the scales and dropping it on them it came in at about 27lbs - but not really that fussed as it needs to be sturdy, rather than light for the single track of california later this year!

The worst of it is I haven't ridden it yet cause of this bloody foot!!

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ltheisinger - Member

The worst of it is I haven't ridden it yet cause of this bloody foot!!

nothing wrong with my foot if you want me to "make sure it's ok"


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the look of those XT wheels.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mattp - Member
nothing wrong with my foot if you want me to "make sure it's ok"

Haha! 😯 Nice one....yeah I'm gutted - I started building in November and finished it last week (not like I've been able to do anything else!) - but it took a while to source all the 2nd hand parts!!!


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

epicsteve - Member

I like the look of those XT wheels.

Cheers - they're the XT M776 - All Mountains


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/32651012@N06/4332987588/in/photostream/ ]pronghorn[/url]Just finished building my pronghorn 20.5" frame 23.88lbs well pleased can't seem to load picture so hope the link works!
I can get discount on the frames if anybody else fancies one


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

" I'm just trying to work out where it's saving over 2lbs on mine "

lack of bar ends
lack of speedometer
lack of saddlebag (though I assume that comes off for 'weigh ins')
lack of extra stickers
It looks like it has those Alex Scandium rims on?
Integrated seatmast
Much smaller shock, no remote lever
Smaller/narrower tyres
It looks to brand spanking new, so no mud (or grease?) whatsoever

Maybe not 2lbs, but some way toward it?


Bar ends 60g, computer ~20g. Saddlebag obviously comes off for weighing. Stickers not on any more, but negligible. Rims 70g less if Alex Scandium - mine are Olympic - but I run tubeless with yellow tape, which grabs a lot of that straight back. Still has a seat clamp, which tend to weigh almost as much as my post - maybe 50g saved. Shock and remote is part of the frame weight which as I mentioned is very similar AFAIK (without mine would be a lot lighter). Tyres are identical. Do you really think I weighed mine with mud on?

In summary we have 200g total for bar-ends, computer, rims (ignoring the extra weight to go tubeless or run sensible tubes with the Alex rims) and seat post.

Could be a little bit in the brakes, but not much. My forks, stem and front mech are all lighter. Where's the other 700g?


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

picking my new light weight pony up this weekend - they lis it at 20.9lbs

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:54 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

I know that bridge:

[IMG] [/IMG]

Not really light enough for this post:

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 4337
Free Member
 

thought this was a thread about lightweight full suss bikes?!?

heckler? 28lb giant?

light for me is sub 23/24lb


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
 

Gotta weight and take some pics of my Anthem X really. Some very very nice bikes on this thread, the way that proghorn looks gives the illusion of a "missing" top tube.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

nicks - Member

picking my new light weight pony up this weekend - they lis it at 20.9lbs

there's a couple of things here - "pony" and white racing ralphs!!!!
i saw a spark team with white tires like this - shouldn't be allowed but that's only my opinion. queue shouts of abuse from scott lovers all over stwforumland


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is dougal still on yon msc thing?

Had two options:

- Receive a 2010 one, the only difference over the 2009 being the headset and seatclamp are colour matched.
- Ride the same frame to see how long it lasts.

I went with the second option, saves me a lot of hassle with postage and stuff too.

Here it is, 20.57lbs with a number board.

[url= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3457/3889186898_ba15709e0c.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3457/3889186898_ba15709e0c.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dougal - white tires coming off and staright on ebay it think ! slighty worried about cutting the frame down !

as for "pony" dont ask !


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

trickydisco - Member

thought this was a thread about lightweight full suss bikes?!?

heckler? 28lb giant?

light for me is sub 23/24lb

Lightweight? What is lightweight? The meaning lightweight is different depending on whether you ride...XC, AM, FR or DH...seeing that I am in the AM category, the 26.8lbs that my heckler weighs in at is pretty damn good considering - brakes, forks, wheels....all of which will probably be heavier than that you can get away with on a 'FRO' XC bike for sure!

My bike will take a hammering, unlike some of the weight weenies on here, although VERY nice bikes.


 
Posted : 05/02/2010 6:37 pm
Page 1 / 2