Forum menu
I don't necessarily disagree but your reaction above could be construed as a bit melodramatic...
Perhaps you're right. I'm just a bit sensitive about it that's all. Apologies.
Not sure it adds much to this debate but Strava as art is harder than it first seems
[url= https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1595/25822349143_dd7c49ef01_z.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1595/25822349143_dd7c49ef01_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/FkQhLg ]StravaArt[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/89686376@N04/ ]WCA![/url], on Flickr
You find conversations about Strava boring so you thought you'd start one here.
๐
This is a funny thread. Most cyclists are boring, it's a fact of life. I remember when I first got into mountain biking all anyone ever talked about was the progression of their forks, the damping and rebound settings and how much sag they were set at. These days if it's not strava it's tyre width, wheel sizes and whether boosted hubs are better than normal size hubs. If I'm with roadies everyone seems to be obsessed about bottom bracket standards and why they got rid of good old non-clicky threaded BBs. Golfers however are much worse. You wouldn't believe how much conversation can be had on the subject of carbon fibre club shafts or whether to use a reverse putting grip.
Odd thread.
My problem with the OP is his judgementalism. So a group of people share a common interest and talk about it. Don't think less of them because you don't, and if you want to, do it in private or risk looking like a nob.