Pike 454 to 2011 Re...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Pike 454 to 2011 Revelations - upgrade?

60 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
195 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've got a 2008 Meta 55 which is built with Maxle, Stan's Flows, flat pedals and wide bars as a 2-4 hour ride 'xc' bike for Peak blasts with the emphasis on fun down the hills rather than climbs, but still wants to be light and capable. If anything it's a little heavy and a touch steep.

The Pike is a great fork but has its limits with damping and packs out on the fast stuff. Have been considering getting it PUSHed but wondering if a new Revelation would make more sense?

- 32mm lowers and 20mm bolt through so still stiff(?)
- Improved damping so no need to PUSH(?)
- Axle to crown is +15mm, still within Meta 55 spec but would slacken the bike slightly (good!) and raise the BB a few mm (help with clearance so not bad).
- Considerably lighter!

Is the new Rev as tough as the Pike and a good choice for blasting down rocky descents?


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

I've done the same change, albeit on a Trance X rather than a Meta 5. I think you're bang on with your thoughts.

The Rev seems equally stiff to the Pike, but is a lot lighter
I'm a suspension tart, and I haven't felt the need to get the fork Push'd. I think all the 2011 ones come with the new rebound damper but worth confirming this, as it's the bit which makes the difference.

I also think the air spring works just as well as the coil did after the initial faff getting the pressures right.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:23 pm
Posts: 14645
Free Member
 

[i]- 32mm lowers and 20mm bolt through so still stiff(?)[/i]
Apparently not from some post on here, plenty stiff but not as stiff as the Pikes.

[i]- Improved damping so no need to PUSH(?)[/i]
Shirely only if you buy the Team (blackbox) version, otheriwse it'll still be Motion control damped? Though having the RS forks PUSHed is supposed to be as good as BB damping.

[i]- Axle to crown is +15mm, still within Meta 55 spec but would slacken the bike slightly (good!) and raise the BB a few mm (help with clearance so not bad).[/i]
...and your question is caller?

[i]- Considerably lighter![/i]
T'is why I bought some, Pikes were overkill for my riding, Rev's were just what I wanted (mine were 1850g or so with 1.5 steerer and 20mm maxle).


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers.

Looking at the "Revelation RLT Ti Dual Air 150mm Maxle Lite 20mm" which claims to have motion control, so should be the new damping.

Plus 150 versus 140 so the extra 10mm would be nice...


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:28 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

z1ppy - Member
- Improved damping so no need to PUSH(?)
Shirely only if you buy the Team (blackbox) version, otheriwse it'll still be Motion control damped? Though having the RS forks PUSHed is supposed to be as good as BB damping.

Non-BB ones are still MoCo but with the DualFlow rebound damper.

gravity-slave - Member

Cheers.

Looking at the "Revelation RLT Ti Dual Air 150mm Maxle Lite 20mm" which claims to have motion control, so should be the new damping.

Actually the RLT Ti appears to have BlackBox, so you get both the rebound and the new compression damper too.

http://www.sram.com/rockshox/products/revelation-rlt-ti


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

...and your question is caller?

No question, just a statement that they are in spec according to Commencal before the "Only warrantied to 140mm" comments! (fire away....)

That's the job - dual flow rebound sounds like it does what Push does and allow faster return on repeated big hits?


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:30 pm
Posts: 14645
Free Member
 

ahhhhhh (to both)


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm a heavy rider, both literally and metaphorically. I can vouch for the 2011 Revs being excellent in fast, rocky big hit territory. I am around 100kg and tend to hit things pretty hard; my Rev RLT Ti with 20mm axle have been excellent in this type of terrain.

Where I do really notice the flex of the chassis is in big landings. Coming in fast to a landing where there isn't the opportunity to perfectly transition the bike, I can really feel the front end splaying fowards. It's really disconcerting when it happens!

The Push tune on the Pike can make it feel really harsh until you get into precisely the kind of fast, big hit, rock terrain you're describing, at which point it does come alive. But it's still a heavy fork for the travel. On the other hand that burly chassis is much more stable on big landings.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

That's the job - dual flow rebound sounds like it does what Push does and allow faster return on repeated big hits?

Yes, pretty much. Think Potato Alley flat out. I've got Pushed Pikes on one bike and 2011 Revs on another, and the Pikes are definitely sturdier and less plush on the smaller stuff than the Revs, but mostly the Revs are excellent and significantly lighter.

One thing to consider - if you increase your AC height, not only will you have a slacker head angle, but you'll also correspondingly slacken the seat angle and change the weight distribution on the bike.

That may or may not be an issue - on steep climbs you might find the front lifts more easily and generally the weight distribution on the bike will possibly shift rearwards. I run Pikes on a Pace RC405 - work well though the bike's designed for 130mm forks. When I put a Revelation on the front, it really did screw up the handling to a surprising degree.

It might not do that with a Meta 55 and even if it does, you may be able to compensate by lowering the bars, changing the seat position on the rails etc,or maybe spacing the forks down to 140mm, but if you're happy with the overall handling balance of the bike with Pikes, the Push tune works well on the flat out stuff, though I'd agree with geetee that it's not super plush on the smaller stuff.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
 

I've got some pushed Pikes and also the older style Revs. What you can do, is replace the Pike's damper with the newer Blackbox damper. I did that with my Revs and it changed them so much. Its the best upgrade I've done, since converting my TALAS 36s to VANs. The blackbox rebound damper is only £70. Its easy to fit and alot cheaper than getting them Pushed and is just as good.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 12:57 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

I've did exactly that change on my SC BLT2 just 2 weeks ago. Haven't noticed any less stiffness but then I don't really do drops and jumps.

I went for the RLT Ti dual position which does have the Blackbox motion control.

They are noticably plusher and lighter and work really well now I've worked out how to set them up. I reckon ignore static sag and just set them up to get about max travel on your biggest hits.

I went for the dual position as even with the Pikes I was struggling to keep the front end down on really steep climbs. Absolutely definitely worth the extra money (and the fact they are black) to make climbing easier, and it's just a 45 deg flick of the lever to change the travel


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Potato Alley flat out is a really good example of where my current forks choke up. Death gripping the bottom section gets a bit sketchy as they pack out and go from relatively plush to virtually no control and it's just a case of 'force it'!

Good point about the seat angle. The saddle is currently right back on the rails so scope to move that forwards but I'm stood up/cranking or walking when it gets into steep wandery territory! It looks like the Revs have dual position to drop the front if I am on mega long climbs.

Lowering the bars would be a good tweak too. Regarding handling with Pikes, I'd also like to slacken the head angle a bit (I think the later ones are slacker). Did consider some bushes but the BB is already low and I catch the pedals quite a lot.

Quoted weights (with pinch of salt) are something like 2020g versus 1727g so sounds like 300g-ish saving and improved damping at the slight cost of some stiffness? Selling the Pikes would probably make it a more cost effective change than Pushing them, or at least close.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Lowering the bars would be a good tweak too. Regarding handling with Pikes, I'd also like to slacken the head angle a bit (I think the later ones are slacker). Did consider some bushes but the BB is already low and I catch the pedals quite a lot.

I've just fitted a -2? slacker headset to my Pace - hence lots of thinking about the effects on geometry of various fork options etc. Just fitted it along with a shorter stem and really pleased so far, so that might be an option, particularly if you have a zero-stack head tube with a 44mm internal diameter - there are two or three options for those now, but it's not impossible even with a conventional head tube.

I mentioned Potato Alley because I had exactly the same issues as you with standard Pikes, with the Pushed ones, everything's loads more composed, less drama, more control. Ditto with the 2011 Revelations.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

IIRC the crown to axle dimension of the Revs is almost 20mm more than the Pikes so will give you about a 1 deg slacker head angle


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 521
Free Member
 

IIRC the crown to axle dimension of the Revs is almost 20mm more than the Pikes so will give you about a 1 deg slacker head angle

Where did you get those figures from? Sram says they are the same [url= http://www.sram.com/_media/techdocs/MY2010%20Crown%20to%20Axle.pdf ]here[/url].


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

Where did you get those figures from? Sram says they are the same

My mistake. My new Revs are 150mm travel so are 10mm longer axle to crown than the Pikes. For some reason I had in my head that the Pikes were 209mm A to C, which would have been 19mm longer


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 4:34 pm
Posts: 613
Full Member
 

Phil, if you do end up selling the pikes, I'd be interested.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 4:39 pm
Posts: 65986
Full Member
 

Definately not as stiff and presumably not as strong, but does it matter, is the question. They're still far from flexy, they just don't quite have the same unshakable feel, I was aware of it when I first fitted them but soon stopped noticing. I can feel it when I switch from my Lyriks to the Revs, unsurprisingly, but it never feels like a problem.

Strength... Mine had an internal failure of the air tube but not due to hard use I don't think, just a "one of those things". They've been reasonably hard used and well crashed though and don't seem to have noticed.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 4:49 pm
Posts: 5111
Full Member
 

I have had nonpushed pikes and pushed pikes, then moved to revelations with BBC damping. Tbh I did not notice any difference in stiffness but the BB damping is better than the push because not only do you get the high speed rebound performance but you don't lose the small bump you do with pushing the pikes. The bb damped revelations are superb and a full pound less than the pikes.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 4:53 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

So a couple of people have commented on the Revs being flexier than the Pikes. I'm wondering if it's really flex or whether its just that the Revs are more active, moving a lot more but under control from the better damping, so possibly giving the impression of flex?


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 5:21 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

So a couple of people have commented on the Revs being flexier than the Pikes. I'm wondering if it's really flex or whether its just that the Revs are more active, moving a lot more but under control from the better damping, so possibly giving the impression of flex?

God only knows, but the extra weight is mostly in the chassis no, so it wouldn't be surprising if Pikes were sturdier and the place I notice it most is over rocky stuff where the Pikes seem to track better laterally, which has nothing to do with fork movement, if anything, a more supple fork would feel better in that situation, I think. In a way it's irrelevant as the Revs, 99.9 per-cent of the time are sturdy enough for me anyway.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 5:31 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

of course Pikes are stiffer than Revs, just one look at the crowns will tell you that.. whether you'll notice it is another matter entirely.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 5:48 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RLT Ti Revelations are very good and lighter, Pushed Pikes also good (I've got a set, with a few extra mods 😀

Stiffness wise maybe a little more flex (only really noticable if your really picky or GNAR!) in the revs but they're 150mm and alot lighter.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 5:51 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Loco - do you sell either Push or Black box damping parts separately that'd fit a 2010 reba maxle? (forgotten the exact model as I de-stickered it straight out the box)


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 5:57 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hi no Push stuff is dealt with by tf, yes can supply BB MoCos and dual flow rebound parts, not that cheap though as RS aftermarket stuff is pricey


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 6:00 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just checked
Moco RRP £ 195.99
Rebound assm. RRP £88.99
However, they'll be a fair bit cheaper 😉


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 6:18 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bluddy hell! Could prob buy a new Reba for that.
thanks for the info tho.

<EDIT> hang on, is there anything in particular better about the performance of a Blackbox Moco cart? new rebound assembly is prob all I'd actually want.


 
Posted : 01/06/2011 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Some great input to help the decision, thanks a lot. In fact, reading this is doesn't sound like much of a decision, Revs getting good reviews.

Currently looking at the RLT Ti 150mm with 20mm axle (non travel adjust, have never used the u-turn on my Pikes)

Checking the listed weights, they show about 470g saving. Just saved 650g off wheels, post, pedals and bash and the ride is transformed so currently thinking I can give up a bit of stiffness for the weight - on an average 2-3 hour ride I spend a lot more time climbing or flicking the bike around than battering into stuff! Plus you need a stiff fork when the damping has packed up and you are slamming into rocks!

Final decision - would white work on a black bike with white bars and bits ([url= ]PHOTO[/url]). Pond needs filling, lawn needs feeding to match new turf and bike has grown a log out of the BB. And yes, I know about the front tyre and valves not aligned!

Paul,
I'll let you know about the Pikes for sure.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 9:42 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that would look so much better if you fitted a black saddle and bars, got rid of the red componments and most of the stickers


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 0
 

GW, There is no real benefit of buying the BB Moco cart. Thats the one with the Ti tube which replaces the red plastic tube in the MoCO unit. What you want is the BB Rebound damper. Its that that makes the differences. I've converted mine for £70. Much better performance, allows so much more oil to flow over fast repeatative hits. Search Mtbr there is loads of info about upgrading to BB rebound. Part No I got was: RockShox Rebound Damper/Seal Head Assembly B (R5397020) Got mine from ebay or try Loco.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hi, Could anyone show me a picture of the rebound damper?


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 10:07 am
Posts: 734
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.forksparts.com/achat/index.php?catid=150 ]Anyone used these guys for upgrades?[/url]


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 10:14 am
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

iang2jones - Thanks. That's what I was thinking too.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 10:16 am
Posts: 8017
Full Member
 

Be interesting to know if http://www.forksparts.com/achat/produit_details.php?id=194&langue=en would fit into my 09 pikes to convert solo to dual air.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 11:27 am
Posts: 0
 

Here is the ebay link for the BB damper. Its for a 150mm rev, but does fit older Revs and should fits Pikes.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/RockShox-Rebound-Damper-Seal-Head-Assembly-B-R5397020-/110645707652?pt=UK_sportsleisure_cycling_bikeparts_SR&hash=item19c2ff8384

There is a shorter 120mm damper available which has a different part number.

The MTBR link shows a picture the BB rebound damper rod vs std damper.
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=669600


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 11:48 am
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Ace, cheers for the BB rebound damper links etc. I'm going to stick one in a Coil U-Turn Sektor and see what happens. Technically it shouldn't work very well as the Sektor incorporates a negative spring in its rebound damper assembly, but I'm wondering if all you'd really lose is a bit of car park plushness on the initial movement. If it's unuseable like that, I'll look at creating some sort of Frankendamper with the dual flow from the black box and the negative spring from the Sektor.

Wish me luck 😉


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 12:45 pm
Posts: 0
 

Hope it works BadlyWiredDog. I suspect coil Sektors with BB damper will be great forks. My BB revs are the coil u-turns and are every bit as good as my Pushed Pike Airs, just a little bit less stiff.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

I think Dual Flow Sektors would rock - light-ish 150mm coil fork with 20mm Maxle, U-Turn and decent high speed damping. All sounds good to me. Plan C might be to stick a surplus Pike Coil U-Turn in the Sektor and have a slightly lighter than a Pike 140mm fork with BB damper... but will see what happens with Plans A and B first...


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 2:54 pm
Posts: 2864
Free Member
 

I'm guessing that most RS parts are interchangable as long as the lowers diameter & thread are similar.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 6:02 pm
Posts: 613
Full Member
 

Phil, yep that'll look good - Rich Palmer's meta 5 is black with white forks and looks very nice.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

I'm guessing that most RS parts are interchangable as long as the lowers diameter & thread are similar.

Mostly I think, with a few exceptions - I just swapped the inners from a set of Pike Air U-Turns into the chassis of my Pike Coil U-Turns for example, but there are a few things that won't work. There's a difference between air and coil air u-turn because the insides of the fork tubes on coil or u-turn forks isn't - supposedly - smooth enough for the seals of an air set-up to work with. And obviously, if you put 140mm coils in a 150mm chassis, you'll only get a 140mm fork, albeit, I guess, with more overlap between stanchions and lowers. But mostly it'll work ime.


 
Posted : 02/06/2011 6:28 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Just in case anyone's interested, I've just stuck a Black Box rebound damper assembly in a Sektor Coil U-Turn fork - the original Sektor damper does, as people have told me, include a negative spring which sits kebab-style on the damper rod. It's a pretty feeble spring, to be honest and I wonder how much it actually achieves, maybe a little car park plush on the initial spring movement.

Anyway, after some thought, I popped it back onto the Black Box damper rod on the basis that it fitted okay and I can always take it off if things feel wrong, and screwed it all back together.

Haven't ridden it yet, so I have no idea what it'll do the fork in real life, but all being well, it should basically upgrade the high speed rebound so it copes better with repeated high speed hits - flat out through rockeries etc, which is where non Dual Flow RS forks tend to choke and kick around.

Will hopefully get out on the Pace tomorrow somewhere rocky and fast and will report back. If it works, then it's a 70-quid upgrade to a fork that only cost me around £300 that should give it a bit more high speed control and make for a very nice trail fork.

I also have a spare Pike MoCo which I might bang on for the added flood gate adjustability, but I'm not sure it'll make any real performance difference.

Just in case anyone's wondering, the rebound damper transplant is a dead easy, 15-minute max job. Basically pop the lowers off, undo circlip with fork legs inverted to stop damper oil pissing out, slide out rebound damper assembly, lube o-rings on new damper assembly, slide back in carefully, reinstall circlip making sure it's fully seated, pop legs back on and add some lubricant to compensate for any you've lost in the process. Job's a good un.


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 8:47 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

BadlyWiredDog - Member

Just in case anyone's interested, I've just stuck a Black Box rebound damper assembly in a Sektor Coil U-Turn fork - the original Sektor damper does, as people have told me, include a negative spring which sits kebab-style on the damper rod. It's a pretty feeble spring, to be honest and I wonder how much it actually achieves, maybe a little car park plush on the initial spring movement.

Interested to hear how well this works on the trail. I thought that spring was more for a soft top out rather than being a negative spring in the air-fork sense.


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 8:58 am
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Possibly you're right about the top out, I guess I'll find out tomorrow, but as I've transferred the spring, I'd expect it to feel similar to stock... Feels fine on a quick blast around the block and some high speed kerbs, like a normal Sektor in fact, which isn't any great surprise. Fwiw, my experience with standard Pike and Sektor is that mostly they're fine, but if you really gun it down something like Potato Ally in the Peak, the front end gets distinctly lairy. Hayfield side of Jacob's as well, that sort of thing.


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 9:23 am
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

In fact, it's actually a 'top-out spring' rather than a 'negative' one. That makes sense. I need to think harder...


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 11:21 am
Posts: 8017
Full Member
 

Is the top out spring just loose on the damper? My pikes could do with a softer top out so adding a spring could be the answer.


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 11:27 am
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Yeah, it just sits on the damper rod so you can slide it off, the only thing to be careful of is what it's seated on I guess. Pikes have a second spring in the coil leg already. Never had a problem with harsh top-out on either of my Pikes, are you sure you don't just need a touch more rebound damping?


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 8017
Full Member
 

Possibly yes, I've only just got them so not really finished tuning to my tastes yet.


 
Posted : 13/06/2011 3:03 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Just whoomphed the black-boxed Sektors over the Jacob's Ladder track, feel ace, compliant and very composed at high speed, which was where they were a little iffy before.

As good as my Pushed Pikes, I think, which I really rate. I stuck the original top-out spring kebab style on the new black box rebound damper, no issues with harsh top-out or anything else so far.

Just a very nice 150mm coil u-turn fork that seems on a par with Push upgrades and the latest Revelations, both of which I've ridden. Nice upgrade, worth doing if you ride fast rocky stuff in the Peak etc.

It's bloody hot out though - lovely 🙂


 
Posted : 14/06/2011 4:55 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Feel good with the BB gubbins in don't they 😉 just been sending a few rebound assms. out today for various 32mm Rockshox.


 
Posted : 14/06/2011 4:58 pm
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

Yeah, I'm chuffed, for 70 quid for the damper and 15 minutes of straightforward tweaking, I'd say it's a pretty good upgrade, Cheers to the fella who posted the eBay link further up the thread 🙂


 
Posted : 14/06/2011 5:12 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

£70 pricey 😉


 
Posted : 14/06/2011 5:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers for options and feedback on the black box damper - definately ordering myself some Revelation RLT Ti dual air in 150mm. Looking forward to trying to find their limits!


 
Posted : 15/06/2011 8:12 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

Cheers for options and feedback on the black box damper - definately ordering myself some Revelation RLT Ti dual air in 150mm. Looking forward to trying to find their limits!

You won't be disappointed. I'm on my 4th week on the RLT Ti's having replaced my Pike 454's. You need to play around with the setup much more, and I run 150psi compared to 125psi on the Pikes, plus I actually use the compression damper which I didn't used to.

They seem very plush compared to the Pikes, with much better small bump sensitivity. Currently experimenting with the best combo of air pressure, compression damping, gate and reboud to get the best set up for me


 
Posted : 15/06/2011 8:19 am
Posts: 11390
Full Member
 

£70 pricey

So what are you charging for a BB rebound damper? Might be buying another one.

Oh, and are there any issues with sticking a Pike Air U-Turn assembly in the chassis which originally housed a Coil U-Turn?


 
Posted : 15/06/2011 8:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Only problem now is I seem to have half talked myself into a new frame to hang the forks on! Frame is likely to come with tapered head tube but can't find the Rev's in the UK with a tapered steerer.

I guess the non-tapered steerer is more versatile and easier to sell, plus can go on my Meta now while I make my mind up if I am going to change the frame!


 
Posted : 15/06/2011 8:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

5 months of dithering and I finally picked up some 2011 RLT Ti's this week. Fitted last night and there's a decent weight saving - about 430g.

2005ish Pike 454 Dual Air U-turn are 2200g inc Maxle.
2011 Revs are 1770g inc Maxle after cutting the steerer (1800g uncut).

Will hammer them this weekend to check the damping and chassis strength!


 
Posted : 18/11/2011 11:47 am
Posts: 13803
Free Member
 

430g?

Wow. I have a set waiting to go on my bike, plus crest rims replacing DT 5.1s, and will be going tubeless too. Could be losing two and a half pounds, by the looks of it.


 
Posted : 18/11/2011 11:53 am
Posts: 1825
Free Member
 

I've just gone (as of last night) from coil 454 Pikes (20mm Maxle/1.125" steerer) to 2011 RLT Revs (air, 15mm Maxle, tapered). The Pikes (with a sizeable crown race still attached) weighed in at 5.45lbs...the Revs came in at 4.00lbs 😯

Will be off out tomorrow to see how they ride, can't wait!


 
Posted : 18/11/2011 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm going to have to wait for a ride as I didn't realise the post to post mount would need an adaptor for my 180mm rotor. First ride on Sunday.

I saved about 650g off the bike earlier in the year and it made a big difference (seat, post, bashguard, about 200g in the wheels) so hoping it'll be good but really looking forward to hitting some fast rocky stuff and testing what I've heard about the damping.


 
Posted : 18/11/2011 3:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hi, I have some Recon 351 Solo air 140mm 2010, does anybody know if the BB rebound damper will fit? Thanks


 
Posted : 29/12/2011 5:38 pm