Forum menu
What's the default general purpose, leave it on for most of the year XC/Bikepark not too hefty UST tyre?
Thanks, sorry
conti rubber queens in 2.2
Racing Ralph
I use 2.4 mountain kings for all the above. I'm thinking of giving rubber queen ago next time (just to see).
Conti vert pro in 2.2
Nobby Nics
high roller 2.35
HR 2.35 LUST doesn't count as 'not too hefty' :p I'd probably vote Rubber Queen going by reviews but not tried it yet...
2.35" Bontrager ACX TR are a good "cheaper, lighter, harder wearing" alternative to a High Roller. But High Rollers for ultimate grip...
HR 2.35 LUST doesn't count as 'not too hefty'
Are you kidding? I had a set and they were about 720g each!
Kenda Blue Groove/Nevegal
Another vote for rubber queens 2.2
LUST's are rubbish I think. The sidewalls are too thin and rip easily. A tyre that might suit you is the bonty big earl 2.35 wet, it's a tyre I rate highly.
At the moment I'm experimenting with 819's, non-UST tyres and a bucket load of latex. I'm going through a lot of latex but am going to weigh the tyres after to see how heavy they're getting.