Forum menu
Mud tyres, which?
 

[Closed] Mud tyres, which?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2053511]

Looking for a 2.1 ish solution for my Meta (not the biggest clearance for a clogged tyre) and have seen:

Maxxis ADvantages, high rollers, cross marks, Conti edges, mountain kings swamp things, Tioga factory XC, Kenda blue grooves. I'm thinking single ply, wire, 70a given the option.

There's a lot of rubber out there and always a mixed review averaging 3.5 out of 5. Most people love their new kit, but someone occasionally highlights a problem eg high rollers having a gap between the centre and shoulder lugs, or mountain kings being crap on wet roots.

I mainly ride woodland trails, sometimes at night. I have a Hutchinson barracuda front and python rear. The barracuda works well but can clog, the python is now getting quite slippy/unpredictable 8O.

Thinking whether to move the barra to the back and get a new front, or replace the python with a new rear?

I have some lovely Spesh enduro pros which I just don't think will fit (fine on the P2, now gone), these may arrive in the classifieds.

All help very appreciated! 😀


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bontrager Mud X.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oh, I'm leaning towards the ADvantage at the moment. Looks like the good bits of the high roller without the transition issue.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:57 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

I use Panaracer Trailrakers - they get highly rated but are very draggy if you are doing any distance on road so I may not bother this winter and just continue to run my Minion DHF's.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 Bontrager Mud X


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mux X 2.0 front Trailraker 2.1 rear on my singlespeed.

Mux X rolls better but trailraker digs in and clears better


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mud X looks good, do you ride on a pair of them or combined with something else?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

medusas on my meta, though stuck with ignitors this winter and they were enough


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Herman Shake - Member

Mud X looks good, do you ride on a pair of them or combined with something else?

As a pair for me on both SS and full suss if that helps.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:15 am
Posts: 8754
Full Member
 

Mud-X unless your riding consists of 90%+ gloopy mud, then a Trailraker might be a better option


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mud x winning so far, any bargain tyres out there doing the job? Although a few quid for better riding always sways me. Says the man who just got a gravity dropper. They're practical, honest!


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:25 am
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

For heavy mud what you need is thin tires, they cut through. These are only any goood IMHO is 90% of what you ride is like that. You sacrifice a lot of handling.

Trailrakers good but VERY draggy as mentioned. Big thick tractor like DH tires lite e.g. Nevegals grippy but heavy.

I would go for Hutchison Scorpions for leavy damp singletrack, if they still make those. I have some in a cupboard somewhere must dig them out. I have a narrow set for super gloop somewhere too.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:27 am
Posts: 3266
Free Member
 

The best mud tyre I've used is a Continental Survival, but I don't think they're in the current range. Deadly on the front though...


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:31 am
Posts: 1015
Free Member
 

Mud X - can leave them on all year round too. Very hard wearing & clear mud almost as well as Trailrakers


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Schwalbe Dirty Dan 2.0 XC's were great earlier in the year.

They are light, fast rolling considering the tread, gave plenty of grip and shed mud well.

The only issue with them is they are really for proper muddy/wet conditions only as the tread is pretty soft and wears fast in the dry.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like Swampthings myself , have some 2.1's for my HT and 2.35's for my bouncer.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 12:25 pm
Posts: 1223
Free Member
 

I'm thinking of some Spesh Sauserwind Control tyres for the upcoming winter. Anyone had any experience of them?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 2746
Full Member
 

Heard good things about the Schwalbe Black Shark 1.5s - they do come in a 2.1 but I don't know what difference the larger volume makes.

Overall I still rate the Mud X.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So I'm sensing a theme of skinny spiky for the gloop and fat medium nobby for everything else. Is the skinny approach based on pressure, to get traction through the soft stuff? Or kind of for clearance so you don't clog?

Medusas look good too, a little cheaper too.

But then the folding ADvantage is the same money in 62a as the mud x. Although 7 votes for the mud x is hard to argue with!

Well I guess it's mud x unless someone can last defence another tyre.

Thanks for the advice all!


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

I'm gunna use Mud-X as I have them in the garage but next time I'll take a look at the Spesh Storm Controls, as the look the same as the Mud-X (and same reviews) but @ 2/3 the price.
Trail-rakers are much better in thick mud/slop, but the advantage you gain in the mud is off-set by the dragginess everywhere else.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

erm, blue grooves aren't a mud tyre.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Mud x or Trailrakers they are both good.
I don`t think the trailrakers are that draggy


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another for Mud X F & R


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another +1 for MudX. Used all last winter front and rear and they were great. Clear very effectively and found grip where I used to slip and slide. Got them pretty cheap too - just over 20 quid each which seemed reasonable to me.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are the Mud-X very low volume or do they come up a reasonable size ?

I know mud tyres are meant to be narrow but some 2.0 come up very narrow.

Will be running them on a HT and its prety rocky where i ride so could do with something a bit bigger volume but still good in mud when it has to be.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They size up on the narrow side, but as they are TLR the side walls are strong so as long as you are running tubeless you can use them at quite low pressures (25 - 30 psi for me) very comfortably.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I know blue grooves aren't technically a mud tyre, a number of others in the list aren't either! I need an open tread knobby for trails which happen to be getting-but aren't always muddy. I don't necessarily need an only this or only that tyre.

Managed to squeeze on the Spesh enduros (50a/60a, 120tpi, 2.3) I like that she's looking a bit more chubby now 😀 . Less room for mud to accumulate, but we'll see how it fares...

I'll definitely keep the mud x on the bike shopping list. People using the same size f+r or going skinny back and medium front? Anyone ghettoed the mud x?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 4:56 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Mud X


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 6:14 pm
Posts: 0
 

Medusa


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 7:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Schwalbe Black Sharks 2.1 mud, great tyre in wet grass / mud conditions; work well on rocks too (FAR better than Trailrakers); as they wear down a bit they become Dirty Dans too!
Conti X Country 1.5s too if they are still available?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anybody have a link to Storm Controls for sale?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does it matter where you are in the country?

Are some tyres better for soft, southern chalky-clayey mud with others being better for grim-up-north grindy gritty mud?


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

mud x!!


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm using Specialized Storm Controls as my mud tyre, I think they're awesome if it's proper muddy, the tread doesn't clog and they've got a nice soft sticky compound so are pretty grippy on wet rocks, etc.

I got them from Evans but they don't seem to stock them anymore but a quick look on google shows plenty of places selling them.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Storm control looks a lot like the mud x 😆 Turns out the Enduro Pro were good, but clogged the clearance up pretty promptly. They need a bigger gap to do they're thing.

Wouldn't gritty mud clear differently to clay mud? I imagine the gritty stuff could benefit from a harder compound due to the grindyness, whereas the southern clay would need a very open pattern. Our mud's pretty sticky dahn saff. Or maybe they both just need the mud x? STW member's tyre of choice it seems!


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:08 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Personally I ran Blue Groove up front and Nevegal rear for the last 12 months, both 2.35", both tubeless and they worked well on everything, rocks, roots, mud, snow, ice, never had any less grip in the wyre forest swamps than anyone running mud specific tyres


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nobby Nics. Fast, light, good traction in mud IMO.

I was fantasizing about them just the other night.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 10:29 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I ride with a club in the Chilterns, home to particularly gloopy and sticky mud. Amongst the riders there's people on trailrakers, mud x and medusas. I have trailrakers and find them pretty good - the 1.95s aren't too draggy. There is a 2.1 version as well. The main thing here is a tyre that clears well.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:30 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

If you ride proper mud in winter nobbly nics are awful....(my summer tyre)

1.8 medusa on the front bit more psi than summer (to cut through glop)
2.0 mud x rear

Great for soggy forest runs, also worked fine on armoured afan style trails without any dramas.


 
Posted : 04/10/2010 11:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bonti Mud X 1.8 for southern mud but whilst they grip they are not trail friendly as they literally cut down to bedrock. Specalized Storm are harder wearing and are less aggresive but not so good over roots as not so easy to run tubeless.


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 12:10 am
Posts: 66109
Full Member
 

"Herman Shake - Member

I know blue grooves aren't technically a mud tyre, a number of others in the list aren't either! I need an open tread knobby for trails which happen to be getting-but aren't always muddy. I don't necessarily need an only this or only that tyre."

Nevegals or Highrollers then maybe. Trail tyres that can shovel mud better than most when they have to. Not a patch on a Mud X or Medusa for real bad mud but then neither of those compares to a Nevegal all the rest of the time so it just depends where you want your tradeoff.

I always end up saying the same thing, if a route is so consistently muddy that I can't just plug through short mud sections on a standard issue trail tyre, I just avoid it, rather than rip it up all winter. But not everyone has that luxury of course.

Hah. you mentioned Factory XCs, worst tyre I've ever used and I remember what 80s tyres were like :mrgreen: Weigh more than my wheels, drag more than my DH tyres, stick about the same as my small blocks at best but lose traction almost randomly. Disasterous really.


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 12:19 am
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

Anyone had experience of Mud-X tyres getting cut? I'm thinking about one but had to take a Jones ACX off after a very short period as it was shredded by flints. Not sure if the Mud-X is a little more robust or not.


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 8:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Last winter in the Chiltern Mud I had a blast on Mud-X's. Went 1.8 Rear and 2.0 front - whether this is better or worse than the same Front and Rear I couldn't tell you ... but it was great fun driving through the mud while others were struggling 😀


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 8:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Northwind- Funny I've just attempted to dibs a High Roller 2.1, for those very reason. eXCeption for £12 dans le post, oh yes.

With regards to the Factory XC, a mate (who's mateness is rapidly diminishing-long story) recommended them. He's been on them for years. They do look pretty primitive! I really wanted Nevegals a while back but they look too cloggy for where I am.

So now hopefully it'll be HR with mud-x and I'll be nobbin it up.

For gloop would the mud x suit the back with the HR on the front for drive? Then thinking t'other way for dryer times. Opinions please 😀


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 9:11 am
Posts: 1015
Free Member
 

Mud X is definitely stronger than Jones ACX-I had the same splitting problem but Mud X have been fine all year round


 
Posted : 05/10/2010 11:01 am
Page 1 / 2