Forum menu
I’ve started to collect a few Park bits and from my experience it is just better.
Some of their stuff is better, some of it is just tat. Things like the hanger alignment tool (for instance) has so much play in it, that its pretty much pointless for the task it was designed for.
Why would anyone dislike Chris King stuff?
something something o-rings something something patents expiring.
And it’s expensive.
Rapha and Trek were two brands that I'd not be interested in buying in the past. Too common and a bit too shouty. Now though I am a bit of a fan of each, based on my shopping experiences when buying from their shops. I appreciated the attention of detail, overall quality and knowledgeable/helpful staff. Will buy again.
something something o-rings something something patents expiring
Not only is that well in the past, you can buy just that bit of the headset, for any of their headsets, rather than buying a whole new one. Spares and upgrades for old kit is what makes me love a brand, personally (see also Hope… and before the sale, Pace). Making kit on your new bike incompatible and disposable within the year, as if you’re expected to buy a whole new bike every few years, has the opposite effect on me.
not niche enough for some.
Too right. Loads of reverse snobbery goes on, even more so when the thing that they're being niche about is a bit shit, like inner tubes for example.
I wonder who they're trying to convince?
Their entry / mid level MTB groupsets aren’t in the same league as shimano ime
Yep, agree with that, but once you get to GX and above they are equally good, and when it comes to electronic/wireless Shimano have been left for dust, I can't imagine any top of the range bike will have XTR specced on it from now on, which is going to be a problem for Shimano. I reckon they've maybe the next iteration (3-5 years) to catch up, or give up entirely in the upper price range. It's interesting that all their new developments are aimed at the lower priced, mass market end of the segment.
I love Chris King stuff. I never had the o-ring issues. Only reason I have gone away from their hubs is the industry keep changing standards that the hubs Will comfortably outlast.
Muc-off/X-lite. Their hardware was overpriced and useless, their cleaning products overpriced
Why would anyone dislike Chris King stuff?
I have a love hate thing with Chris King, I quite admire the engineering and attention to detail, and their bearings are waaaay better than pretty much everything, and they are undoubtedly pretty, but then there's the price, and the, I dunno, smugness? (it's not quite that, but you know) about them and o-rings and expansion rings that was laughable.
But mostly it's "How bloody much?"
I think Surly bikes are not good value in the UK. You'd be better off building one up yourself. They do seem to be well thought out and well made, and will last a long time. I especially like their allowance for bigger tyres. Some of their components are very good, anyone use one their stainless steel singlespeed sprockets? These things can outlive you IMO.
Salsa, their sister brand is similar in being overpriced for full bikes, but I've a pair of their bars (Saltflat) which are excellent and only £40.
The one brand that comes to mind as being devisive is Pace.
But mostly it’s “How bloody much?”
Seen the price of a new SRAM “Transmission” rear mech? And a Chris King headset will outlast one of those by decades.
To clarify, I love CK stuff, but that’s what gets trotted out about them as why folk think it’s shiny tat.
Can we do components?
Shimano GRX cranks are both equally amazing and annoying.
Theyre tough, light, cheap, function well and look good. They also use existing bottom brackets but..... Why did they make them with a unique bolt pattern? You can only fit GRX specific chainrings, which is very annoying if you want to go oval (an oval ring for these is something like £80!) or less than Shimano smallest 40t chainring.
I did build my Surly myself as with most bikes it allows you to have the bits you want.
<!--more-->
Avid/SRAM brakes seem marmite. Most people go for Shimano these days but I still love my old Elixir 3s, the lever feel is great and I have loads of modulation and power when I need it. They are a pain to bleed though but once that's done they're pretty hassle free.
I had an old SLX set that I took off after the first few rides as I hated the wooden on/off feel. Also the pistons cracked and leaked everywhere. Maybe just had a dodgy set but it's put me off for years.
Dislike Santa Cruz - the Burberry of the bike world. See also Rapha.
Again Orange, dog of a bike, although again, personal.
Like Hope, Cotic, Spesh, Carradice, Surly (although I dislike the marketing and overinflated prices), Lusso, Exal, Mavic, Easton, Kona.
Some people love Hambini.
Many people think he’s a colossal bellend.
Some of us think he is a colossal bellend but thats why we love him!
Haibike aesthetics
Endura. The stuff from years ago was good. Modern replacements less so. ☹️
Rapha and Trek were two brands that I’d not be interested in buying in the past.
Rapha is a very good example of a Marmite brand.
Most people who do use it regard (most of) it as very good.
Most people who don't use it regard the people who do use it as stereotypical all the gear no idea.
The latter people are wrong, obviously and I think the image issue is far less than it used to be but there's still a core minority who will always look down on the brand.
Orange always seemed (to me) like a bit marmite as well. A load of people who defended them for their simplicity, made-in-Britain etc and a load of people who regarded their bikes as being "industrial", possibly related to filing cabinets...
On which note, where have all the Orange bikes gone?! Used to be you couldn't move around the Peak District for Orange 5's everywhere. Now... Nothing, not a hint of an Orange.
A lot of the time, when you're paying more, it's for a good reason. One 140mm travel carbon bike is not the same as another, with all sorts of qualities that only come out with long term ownership.
Eg from my experience of ownership of a YT, and a friend's ownership of an Orbea, 3-4 years into ownership in a wet environment, bits start dropping off. Those same bits are mechanically attached on my Specialized, which is inherently more expensive.
I’d go for Pace. Never owned one myself but they seem to get equal amounts of love and hate on here. Trek are a brand that seem very beige but of the big three they’re the only one to ever do something interesting. Stache, full Stache and that cruiser thing who’s name I always forget.
Pinarello - largely by association.
I'm obviously in the wrong when it comes to marmite brands. I'm an engineer and I'm pretty much obsessed with stuff that just works. I don't have kids and can afford good stuff. Been mtbing for 35 years. Riding Santa Cruz since 2002 (basically due to the original blur being immense compared to its contemporaries), I use Chris King headsets and bottom brackets religiously, DTSwiss hubs, Reserve rims, sqlabs saddles, ergon grips, shimano brakes and transmission. I don't quite get fashion. I try stuff, if it works and is better than what I've been using, I see if I can afford it.
An example being hope brakes. When hydraulic disc brakes first came out, I bought some hopes to stop going through rims every 6 months. After a few years of continuously having to fix hope brakes (I still have a full set of soft goods for a hope mini brake), I switched to Shimano. You have difficulty fixing them when they tank, but, for me, they rarely tank.
People who love Moultons REALLY love them. And people who don’t get them really deride them. That’s full on Marmite.
I'm not sure I agree. Moulton (the man and the brand) are part of cycling history, especially cycling innovation. There are people who are really into that and love to collect their stuff from the stuff that was ubiquitous utilitarian for going to the shops and the experiments in suspension and fancier materials. Then there is the everyone else who either is completely ignorant of it's existence or superficially doesn't like it because it's not what they are used to seeing today and does not comprehend the context. i.e. the two groups are the informed geeks and the ignorant Jonnie come lately! For it to be a true marmite brand I think both parties need to be equally informed but just come to different conclusions.
Marino?
Marin?
(Or is the latter just beige rather than marmite)
Not parts, but still bike industry
MBUK
GMBN
Guy Kesteven
Rob Warner
Sam Pilgrim
Tommy C Hype
Singletrackworld
No-one mentioned Lefty forks yet? They provoke some pretty strong reactions!
Endura. The stuff from years ago was good. Modern replacements less so.
Indeed.
My experience of buying three Endura pieces a year back is 3 different sizes (despite what the label says), some sh*t design details and all three having stitching come undone in a year.
Yet other people love them...
Red Bull. Many seem to think they are saviours of the sport. I think they are just another big corporate exploiting the sport for their own commercial gain
I’m not a Trek fan - the way they treated Greg Lemond and their association with Armstrong, plus I’ve seen bikes frames fail and them not honouring their warranty.
Bianchi - worked in a dealer when Pantani was in his pomp - sales went up as the quality went south. Italian equivalent of Raleigh and Peugeot, mainly selling mass-produced BSOs.
Rapha - had some original stuff (bought cheap) but never quite got their schtick.
I don’t know about saviours, but Red Bull do seem to put a lot back into sport and have done so for a very, very long time. Long after many other sponsors have come and gone.
I think they are just another big corporate exploiting the sport for their own commercial gain
but you are fine with smaller companies doing the same? At what size should they bow out?
Bianchi – worked in a dealer when Pantani was in his pomp – sales went up as the quality went south. Italian equivalent of Raleigh and Peugeot, mainly selling mass-produced BSOs.
Same with a lot of Italian stuff though. Create a heritage and history around it, keep jacking the prices up and up. Pinarello, Bianchi, Campagnolo...
Campag is another Marmite brand. The aficionados will go on (and on, and on) about it. Everyone else thinks it's overpriced and not as good or as innovative as Shimano and SRAM.
I'd offer up almost any tyre brand as bringing out quite 'marmite' opinions.
At some point people are going to buy the wrong tyre for their weight/riding style/local mud and have views about that experience, especially if it ruins a trip/ride. Likewise, at some point they'll find something that works for them and rave about it. And no one is ever going to agree.
I'm currently trying to choose new tyres.
exploiting the sport for their own commercial gain
name a sponsor that doesn't. You can both promote a sport, and exploit it for gain.
not a brand, but steel full suspension frames must be marmite.
You've got all I had:
Orange
Santa Cruz
Hunt Wheels
Not parts, but still bike industry
Influencers we love to hate thread? I'm not going to be the one to start it.
@thols2 it's not a variation on a theme, they straight up ripped off both Hope and DW.
All engineering is basically a variation on existing designs. The DW link and Giant Maestro are both variations on upper and lower control arm suspension
would it not depend on what the patent says?
trek also ripped off a DW design. big companies know who can’t take them to court and the bruhaha surrounding the small but renowned company’s protest add kudos to you product.
amusingly trek went after GT when they decided that the updated idrive platform infringed the patents for the maverick monolink.
Specialized. Who tries to trademark “Roubaix” and close a cafe? I still have my T- shirt. Some great bikes and same interesting paint schemes (s- works).
See also Cannondale and 'Freeride'.
I'd definitely say Yeti.
Can honestly say my 575 was probably my favourite bike ever but I know
most people would say they make hugely expensive bikes that they wouldn't touch for a variety of reasons. Shame they didnt make an updated version of the 575 instead of the sb66 which ate bearings for breakfast.