Forum menu
Ok, so Everesting is defined to a very prescriptive, accurate and tedious degree https://everesting.cc/the-rules/
I've been trying to work out whether an MTB option is possible (mainly because I got a lovely Giant Anthem that I want to get the most out of). Searching reveals a few people doing off road Everests, but the emphasis is firmly on tarmac/non tarmac, not actually mountain biking.
For example, this bloke uses his road bike with some slightly wider tyres on it. Good challenge, but definitely non mountain biking: http://www.everestinguk.com/2014/08/off-road-everesting-chapel-house-wood.html
Likewise this chap did something well impressive, but not mtbing... https://www.sirguylitespeed.com/everesting-3-mynydd-graean-gravel-mountain-wales-2017/
But the problem is how to define actual mountain biking. Even the best routes in the UK usually involve roads/ fire roads. I'm tempted to go with the Scottish Ice Climbing type explanation "If it's easier in crampons then it's in winter condition".... "if it's easier on a mountain bike than a road bike then it's a mountain bike ride" Which of course only works well if you stipulate that you need to ride it all. Cos of course many non tech MTB rides would be faster on a road bike as long as you could portage the hard bits.
Anyway, what is the best definition of a MTB 8848m ride:
* A ride where the up and down is all off road, with some bits that are only possible on a mtb and you need to ride all of it?
* A ride where the descent is all off road, with bits that are only possible on an mtb (ride up a different route)
* A ride where the descent is nearly all off road, with bits that are only possible on an mtb (ride up a different route)
* Any ride part of which is only possible on MTB?
* Any ride where long stretches are only possible on an MTB
I thought through various options and completely failed to think of any Non Trail Centre ride where you could ride up and down the same route, but would not be possible on an MTB.
I thought of a few rides which fit the third definition, eg Snake Pass/Cut Gate or Edale to Mam Nick then down Hollins cross and back to Edale. But the Snake/Cut route would be unjustifiably dangerous for a 24, and indeed isn't all rideable so fails that definition ( ok, you could probably ride it clean once or twice, but certainly not after 15 attempts in the middle of the night). Hollins is better, but it contains a fair amount of road on the descent, so not perfect.
Up Rowlee Farm and down Hagg Farm seemed like quite a good option.
But then I concluded that the only places I could think of were either road bike accessible (and therefore not really MTB) or just too damn hard to do repeatedly through the night in a state of exhaustion.
Which really comes as no surprise, that should have been obvious from the start.
So:
1) can anyone think of a good definition of MTB Everesting
2) More importantly, can anyone recommend a good hill/hills for an attempt on 8 July in or near the Peak District.
PS. Should have said, I'm not interested in the more tedious elements of the Everesting rules, such as must be up the same hill each time; and you can't ride in a loop. Essentially what I am after is a hill or set of hills to attempt on an mtb which aren't rideable on a road bike but also aren't ridiculously hard
Sorry for the garbled post..
Oh yes, just to be clear, I know I'm not up to it, but I'd like to try, and see if I can get around 6k or so.
There's an old discussion on STW about this, but it has suffered from the stupid OldThread = UsellessThread + ClosedThread nonsense that we have. So I couldn't reply to it.
Define MTB 😉 Do you just mean anything that isn't a skinny-tyre roadbike that might, therefore, include gravel?
There are a couple of routes near me in Glen Feshie where an off-road Everesting attempt would be possible. I can think of a couple of others on the other side of the A9 too (one is a loop) but it really comes down to how many repeats you could be bothered with.
For it to be a true Everesting, it has to be up and down the same hill. Otherwise it's just a very climby ride!
The obvious one that strikes me as a true off road up and down is Roych Clough from the stream at the bottom either up towards Rushup or go the other way to Mount Famine. First one is not all rideable, second option is touch and go a bit depending on conditions, fitness etc. Both have gates in them though which would make it a pain.
That's always going to be the main issue, finding a track that's not constant stopping for gates.
Jagger's Clough and the routes up to Hope Cross are probably worth considering too.
Bear in mind the logistics too (food and drink). It's s lot of stuff to carry in and stash somewhere which is why a car parked on the climb comes in very handy!
From Cairngorm carpark up the landy track to the Ptarmigan and back down Windy Ridge. Or go all the way to the summit and ride down Fiacaill Coire Cas. All off road, all rideable up and down. Would need to check how many laps you'd need.
For it to be a true Everesting, it has to be up and down the same hill. Otherwise it’s just a very climby ride!
Absolutely this. Everesting is more about the mental challenge of doing something hateful and tedious hour after hour than the physical challenge of just climbing that far. It's the absolute acknowledgement that you can suck all the joy out of something simply by picking an arbitrary target to achieve.
Just go for a long ride, enjoy it and if it happens to cover 8k of climbing, bonus.
(IMO anything likely to give you that sort of climbing in one ride its going to fail to meet your "not possible on a road bike" criteria. There's a reason national championship level mtb marathon is shorter than a wiggle sportive for over weight mamils)
FFS, just find somewhere you enjoy riding and don't overthink things.
As said above, you have to ride up and down the same road/trail. If you were doing that on a ‘not possible on a road bike’ trail, that would be some serious physical effort and concentration, for a lot of hours. The reason the off road guys do it on a fire road is so they get a break on the way down. You wouldn’t have that on a rough trail.
Yeah, nah.
Hardly onerous rules! Ride up and down the same hill in one continuous activity under your own power until you've ridden the height of Everest.
If you know the strava segment ID then plug it into here https://everesting.cc/app/lap-calculator/ and it will tell you how many laps you need to do along with how far you'll ride and how hard it's likely to be. Obviously "hard" is relative but there's a sweet spot between too easy an angle and therefore it's either a long hill with a lot of time wasted for descent or a short hill and you've hundreds of laps. Too steep and you'll be most likely pushing towards the end.
There's been a bit of activity on the fastest Everesting challenge recently, Lachlan Morton is the current holder of the fastest time - under 8 hours!!!! - but the previous holder, Keegan Swenson said he chose his segment because it was very easy to descend, basically straight enough that he didn't have to brake until just before the turnaround at the bottom. His average speed on the descents was 80kmh!
I managed an Everest last year at Kronplatz in South Tyrol. 9,300m of elevation gain /descent.
Admittedly the cable car helped, but the descending was on proper gnarly enduro trails.... 😁
Kiwi guy I know just did an Everest in BC , think it was a gravel road climb and a black diamond descent !
Silver Glen in the Ochils would be a good one to do:
Steep landy track climb on gravel/rubble all the way. Just 18 laps required.
https://www.strava.com/segments/4759610
Doesn't take you to the top of anything though so you would want to turn right and climb on to Ben Buck at the least. That would also add some height and reduce the number of laps required 🙂
I did this two days running once - never again.
PS: Got into a debate with a local Scout leader about this during the week on social media.
She'd over-estimated the climbing on a hill by 30% by including GPS drift (look at a map FFS!)
Obviously “hard” is relative but there’s a sweet spot between too easy an angle and therefore it’s either a long hill with a lot of time wasted for descent or a short hill and you’ve hundreds of laps. Too steep and you’ll be most likely pushing towards the end.
Yeah, Everesting is a combination of being fit enough to ride up and down hills basically all day; the planning and logistics challenge of finding the "right" hill that's rideable, the food and drink to sustain you etc; and the mental challenge of overcoming the boredom.
I did a "very climby ride" on the CX a couple of years ago for a Rapha Rising challenge - they'd picked 4600m as the height gain over two queen stages of the TdF or Giro or something and put a challenge out to ride that height in a week. I did it in a day by virtue of finding all the road and gravel climbs near me that I could and just stringing a route together (no up and down reps). Took 200km to achieve it. So a route that does nearly double that climbing purely off-road is going to be one hell of a long ride!
There's probably a "partial loop" of the Red or Black at Glentress or Inners where you could ride up mostly fireroad, descend mostly singletrack and get the required height...?
Càrn Bàn Mòr from Achlean farm is 750m in 5km. I'm not sure I could manage 2 of those, never mind 12.
Càrn Bàn Mòr from Achlean farm is 750m in 5km
Goodness me. Not thought of that route for a while. I did it the day Lady Di died. Which must make it a good twenty years...
For it to be a true Everesting, it has to be up and down the same hill. Otherwise it’s just a very climby ride!
Like I said, I'm not interested in that particular part of the challenge.
The obvious one that strikes me as a true off road up and down is Roych Clough from the stream at the bottom either up towards Rushup or go the other way to Mount Famine. First one is not all rideable, second option is touch and go a bit depending on conditions, fitness etc.
Yep, bit the problem is that neither side would be rideable after the first few goes
Jagger’s Clough and the routes up to Hope Cross are probably worth considering too
Agreed. Roman road and the other one very close to it running in parallel sounded like an option
FFS, just find somewhere you enjoy riding and don’t overthink things.
I'm so sorry for discussing this on a MTB forum. Are we only allowed threads about Corbyn , Brexit, wheel size and pictures of people's new bikes on their back garden now?
So sorry.
From Cairngorm carpark up the landy track to the Ptarmigan and back down Windy Ridge. Or go all the way to the summit and ride down Fiacaill Coire Cas. All off road, all rideable up and down. Would need to check how many laps you’d need
Now that is definitely a candidate for a pure challenge. Alas I doubt id manage the climb more that a country times in the day. Lovely idea though
Also not an option for a week on Wednesday....for me.
I suspect the 'do it on the same hill' thing is more about the ease of completing it than the mental challenge it brings - smashing up and down a 10% gradient is obviously much more efficient than peddaling along a load of flatish bits to get to the next hill that adds any real value.
I wouldn't fancy it mtbing though - south downs way in a day is a lot of climbing, but less than half an everest
I'd do this one 56 times. Rideable both ways. If I matched my fastest time for the climb and the descent every time it would take me about 23.5 hours 🙂
https://www.strava.com/segments/1599450
Ha - I had been thinking about doing one a month back, I even went and scoped out some of our local road climbs to pick the best gradient and climb length to suit and very quickly realised that doing it safely with other traffic coming for 24 hours was a non-starter, so decided to do it on one of the climbs on the SDW where I if I fall asleep on the bike its just a hedge to climb out of rather then a car bonnet.
Its only 74 climbs. How hard can that be?
Then I had to have my tonsils removed pdq.
Back on the trainer at last so its all shelved for a couple of weeks.
This is going to be Type 2 fun
Up and down the bridleway on Cadair Idris about 12 times?
so decided to do it on one of the climbs on the SDW
out of interest, which one? Tank tracks (the segment 'absolute b*stard' on strava) is near me, and leads up to the SDW, but with 136m of ascent in 0.9km, its hard enough when I'm fresh let alone after 65 attempts 😀
Thanks for the video links. Seems to suggest two things.... In order to make the descent proper MTB, and the ascent rideable, they need to be different trails. Ie s loop instead of a there'n'back.
And also, trail centre sounds like a good plan.
Starting to think that Lower Cliff at Cannock would be a good option. Up the fire road for a bit, up Insidious Incline and then down. Around 80m height gain according to Ttrailforks.
I seem to recall that you can part right at the bottom of it as well, which is pretty essential for pit stops.
Starting to think that Lower Cliff at Cannock would be a good option. Up the fire road for a bit, up Insidious Incline and then down. Around 80m height gain according to Ttrailforks.
111 reps?! 😲
I'd be looking at Welsh / Scottish trail centres where you've got decent amounts of height gain on rideable trails plus the facilities like parking, cafe etc to support it.
39 reps of the short Minton Batch loop @ 35 minutes/lap.
Not sure I've ever done a lap that fast.
Maybe Lordshill descents on Eastridge, need to do around 70ish laps. That may well be doable, very minimal flat but then the climb is on road.
Llandegla gravel Road is a good option as you can everest it properly, not do a loop, not that you're allowed into Wales at the moment anyway.
The hill in the woods near me is also doable as its just shy of 90m gain over about 2km, so 100 repeats
Ok, so Everesting is defined to a very prescriptive, accurate and tedious degree
I can't be bothered with that sort of thing, the simpler a challenge is the better. Surely the only thing you need to 'Everest' is to have done a single ride that took in 8848m of climbing. Easiest done as laps probably but it seems like an unnecessary criteria. If I did any ride with 8848m of climbing I'd be quite content to say I'd Everested even if I didn't make it onto their list. You won't find my name on the Bob Graham completers list because I didn't meet their criteria of being accompanied but I definitely did it!
I reckon the climb in the 'Puffer would be good for an gravel Everest.
You have the forestry carpark suitable for a base, with toilets.
If you just go to the top of the hill past Loch na Crann, it's 139m over 3.2km
So 64 times gets you an Everest.
The bottom parking area is big enough to do an Everesting event.
It would be mind-numbing, but people are daft enough to do the 'Puffer, so... 🙂
can’t be bothered with that sort of thing, the simpler a challenge is the better. Surely the only thing you need to ‘Everest’ is to have done a single ride that took in 8848m of climbing. Easiest done as laps probably but it seems like an unnecessary criteria. If I did any ride with 8848m of climbing I’d be quite content to say I’d Everested even if I didn’t make it onto their list.
Exactly, totally agreed. That's what I'm after.
(with the caveat that I want it to be mtb)
Llandegla gravel Road is a good option as you can everest it properly, not do a loop, not that you’re allowed into Wales at the moment anyway.
Not convinced about this one. (assuming you mean the one parallel to the initial climb)
* It's in Wales, which is closed
* It's not really mtb, it would be far faster on a road bike
* It descends too much to be a good climb
* It's got way too many flat bits, and is too shallow a gradient
* it's also hugely exposed to the wind
* More importantly you can't park a car near it for supply purposes
* Even more importantly they won't let you ride out of hours normal opening hours.
I think Llandegla fire road would necessitate about 440km of riding... 🙁
I can't help you find a route, but my opinion on what makes it a "propoer MTB route" for the purposes of this challenge.
It is possible to ride it all on an MTB, but would not be on a gravel/road bike - the first time round, fatigue and darkness may mean there are a few dabs later on in the challenge.
Descents should all be off road, or if not perfectly possible, more road climbing than road descending.
Recommendation is a fireroad or road climb, followed by some sigletrack/doubletrack descending.
The climb you want to be doing aerobically. Any sort of standing up or climbnig features like step ups and you are going to be going anearobic. Muscles won't last the challenge.
The descent is primarily to get you back to the bottom efficinetly, so you want something you can do at fairly high speed, and not constantly on the brakes.
----------
Alternative MTB definintion, as I count rides by distance descended, not climbed: 8848m of descending, where all of it is on trails/paths that make a route that could not be done on a road/gravel bike (so a smooth bit in the middle of a trail that also has rocks or jumps on it would be allowed). Climbing can be done by any means, Chairlift, van, helicopter, or god forbid, an ebike.
So 8 circuits round the whistler village gondola; or 11 runs up the funicular and down Black 8 in Bourg St Maurice.
Surely the only thing you need to ‘Everest’ is to have done a single ride that took in 8848m of climbing.
I think it's about the pureness of tackling one 'mountain'. Climbing Everest is about going up (and down), it's not about doing a tour of the Himalayas. The monotony is part of the charm. From an ethos perspective I totally 'get' why it has to be one climb.
I also think technically it's more pure as an out-and-back rather than a loop. With a loop you can use momentum from the down to make the climb easier. That detracts from the purity.
Which is all the reason why it'd be totally awful on an MTB. Whilst I love a good techy climb, there's no trail I know that would be fun going up THAT many times but still be fun on the way down. If you make it too smooth / easy, you might as well use a road bike. It's something I've thought about a fair bit, but don't know if I'd ever put my plans into action.
Fire road up + techy descent is hard enough physically and would be way more enjoyable. Ideally the decent would be shorter / steeper than the climb to minimise the distance & time. That's how I'd do it, to hell with the 'rules'.
Alternatively a more pure interpretation of the rules could be an out and back with the entry criteria 'not doable on a road bike' 😀
The rules of Everesting are what makes it a challenge. It's not just any 8848m it's one climb/descent to make up that elevation. Nothing to stop you doing 8848m of ascent by any means but it ain't Everesting.
If you don't want to play by the rules of the game don't play, simples!
Bloody hell, just looked up the obvious candidate round here, Cam Fell from Gearstones. 36 reps and 19 hours...and probably too gravel bike friendly to count.
11 runs up the funicular and down Black 8 in Bourg St Maurice.
That'd be ace. Think I managed 6 consecutive runs there once. We visited it most evenings we were out there for one or two runs but spent an afternoon on it once. The challenge was always to beat the funicular back down for minimal queuing!
I like ajw's definitions. and Superficial seems to come to a similar conclusion here:
Which is all the reason why it’d be totally awful on an MTB. Whilst I love a good techy climb, there’s no trail I know that would be fun going up THAT many times but still be fun on the way down. If you make it too smooth / easy, you might as well use a road bike. It’s something I’ve thought about a fair bit, but don’t know if I’d ever put my plans into action.
Fire road up + techy descent is hard enough physically and would be way more enjoyable. Ideally the decent would be shorter / steeper than the climb to minimise the distance & time. That’s how I’d do it, to hell with the ‘rules’.
So, we appear to be agreed... for the MTB height challenge, it makes much more sense to have a loop than there and back.
Alternatively a more pure interpretation of the rules could be an out and back with the entry criteria ‘not doable on a road bike’ 😀
Nope, because it would be impossible (IMHO) to find a piece of track that you could repeatedly ascend on an MTB in a state of exhaustion but that couldn't be descended on a road bike.
The rules of Everesting are what makes it a challenge. It’s not just any 8848m it’s one climb/descent to make up that elevation. Nothing to stop you doing 8848m of ascent by any means but it ain’t Everesting.
If you don’t want to play by the rules of the game don’t play, simples!
Ach bollocks. If you don't mind me saying so. I'm not interested in that side of it. And in relation to your second point, I was in fact going to call the whole Operation K2ing rather than Everesting because as we all know K2 is in fact a much more worthy challenge than Everest.
In the end I didn't title the thread K2ing, because it would have confused people and been pretentious as ****.
However, to allay people that keep saying I need to stick to the Everesting rules....
Ok this is a K2ing attempt, not an Everesting attempt:
K2ing The act of completing 8611m of ascent & descent on a mountain bike in a single ride. The descent should be mainly off road and should be something that isn't possible to ride (repeatedly) on a road bike. Ascent can be via a different route, or the same route if you are a riding god.
Martin - is that to the first lot of gates or just to where it meets the PBW?
Nearby is this segment https://www.strava.com/segments/1579855 but it really needs adjusting to start at the beck crossing about 1km into the segment and finish at the gate.
Then there's always the Roman Road - https://www.strava.com/segments/18734795
Cool, so I think we're done. All that remains now is for someone to do it.
ROOOOOOOB
c'mon man. Get your shit together and ride it. The good news is that its now 237m shorter.
🙂
Rule #1 of K2ing - all toys must remain in the pram for the duration of the challenge 😊
busted 🙂
OP is a descendant of William Webb Ellis and I claim £5
Had to google that one.
🙂
What can I say, I've got a new lightweight bike that I want to use (and it isn't very good at proper MTBing so I need to invent a niche for it).
(Actually not that light, and certainly not that new)
Nothing to stop you doing 8848m of ascent by any means but it ain’t Everesting.
By the definition of a commercial organisation...
I think it’s about the pureness of tackling one ‘mountain’
From the generalists link it looks like it's more about selling merchandise. I'm very suspicious of brand specific athletic activities like this appears to be and IM definitely is.
Martin – is that to the first lot of gates or just to where it meets the PBW?
Basically this one, give or take
https://www.strava.com/segments/2383992
Wouldn't want to do the one up from the Bainbridge side since they dumped a load of big gravel on it!
Gayle up to Cam Fell might be a contender now it's been sanitised.