Forum menu

[Closed] E-Livid

Posts: 12667
Free Member
 

f we are really concerned about erosion then perhaps we should stop riding full stop.

We could ban stop those pesky walkers as well, must be loads of them causing erosion as well.........

Yep, and horse riders and deer and rainfall and wind.
In fact all access should be stopped and people should be limited to looking at pictures of it.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:00 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

So twice the erosion, then;

Good thing?

Or

Bad thing?


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:07 pm
Posts: 9597
Free Member
 

@Mrlebowski,

True, but the IMBA data still suggest that there is the potential for increased damage at turns & grade changes.
It does, I'd expect that due to added weight and riders being able to climb with added power. I think it's well within the range of difference we'd see between riders of different weight and fitness though or a loaded vs unloaded unpowered bike. Not pitching in against what you're saying, more trying to show the perspective that I think that IMBA doc backs up when a 250W bike is what we're looking at.

Anyone care to explain why twice the usage isn't twice the erosion?
It is. But if that's an argument to act on then bike sales should be capped or we should all have a mileage quota : ) Don't blame E-bikes for that one when I can ride well over 2x as far as I could a few years ago just from a bit of motivation and training?


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:18 pm
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

Twice the erosion is good, it means someone somewhere is spending twice the the time enjoying the outdoors.

Of course its not twice because ebikes don't make it twice as easy or cause twice as much damage for the same milage but if you're going to reduce it to such a simplistic level then I'm still going for twice the erosion is good.

I accept I'll be misquoted for years to come on this matter.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:20 pm
Posts: 20979
 

So twice the erosion, then;

Assuming EVERYONE rides twice as far, and those extra miles are equally off road to what they would have done anyway. And that the off-road they are riding isn't a maintained/reinforced trail.

So nowhere near twice the erosion, then.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:28 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

So twice the erosion, then;

Good thing?

Or

Bad thing?

What about fast riders like Njee then ? I bet he puts out more than 250W constantly, so maybe fast blokes shouldn't be allowed to MTb either as they're causing more erosion than slower ones ?

What about weight... how much of a factor is that then, what about fat riders ? Are they not allowed either ?


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 12:29 pm
Posts: 15458
Full Member
 

I am simply unimpressed by e-bikes.

Sure they're a positive enough application for technology to help people who would otherwise be unable or more limited in their riding due to some sort of physical constraint.

But they're now being pitched at the well funded, new golfers aren't they.
So really it's another industry gimmick for "sports tourists" they can hurl £3k at an e-mtb, call themselves "mountain bikers" for six months, then leave it in the shed for the battery and tyres to go flat... Normal product lifecycle innit.

Ultimately when I drag my own lardy arse up a hill using my meagre human generated joules only, I feel a greater sense of achievement than I would if I delegated some of the effort to a bosch motor... doing it all for myself is part of the enjoyment, nothing competitive about it, just a personal [i]'ethic'[/i] if you like...

If others can only derive the same enjoyment through the use of an e-bike, fair enough...


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:02 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am over my hate for e-bikers, but have you seen those off-road segway safarists? 👿


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:08 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

weeksy - Member

What about fast riders like Njee then ? I bet he puts out more than 250W constantly, so maybe fast blokes shouldn't be allowed to MTb either as they're causing more erosion than slower ones ?

What's needed is a credit system- ebike owners and powerful riders can offset their erosion against the reduced impact of a puny or lazy rider, or the 90% of stw that never actually ride a bike. We could call it gnarbon credits.

Really it's just a formalisation of the traditional stokens system, we just need to work out the transfer methods.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:20 pm
Posts: 12667
Free Member
 

Ultimately when I drag my own lardy arse up a hill using my meagre human generated joules only, I feel a greater sense of achievement than I would if I delegated some of the effort to a bosch motor... doing it all for myself is part of the enjoyment, nothing competitive about it, just a personal 'ethic' if you like...

If others can only derive the same enjoyment through the use of an e-bike, fair enough...

My thoughts exactly. I can't see me getting an eBike any time soon and going uphill under my own power is what I enjoy most. But that is what I like doing and eBike riders are doing what they like doing


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:21 pm
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

cookeaa -Sure they're a positive enough application for technology to help people who would otherwise be unable or more limited in their riding due to some sort of physical constraint.

Do pies and beer count?

I like bikes but I like pies and beer more


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:26 pm
Posts: 20979
 

going uphill under my own power is what I enjoy most.

[i]Really[/i]? Like, actually, really?

*Awaits first bike park where you ride to the top then get a downlift.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:28 pm
Posts: 7972
Free Member
 

For me there is no sense of achievement, riding a bike is not a challenge, its an excuse to be outdoors away from people. So the quicker & further I can get from you lot the happier I am.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

gnarbon credits 😀


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:34 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

*Awaits first bike park where you ride to the top then get a downlift.

It may be apochryphal, but there has long been talk of ze Germans doing this in Garda.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:39 pm
Posts: 20979
 

Wonder what the heroes would ride? Super light xc weapon to get to the top fast, or a super heavy POS to show how hard they are?

Kerley?


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gnarbon credits - an idea stated in jest, but actually strikes at a deeper point, with me anyway. I have a persistent guilt that I don't contribute directly to the upkeep of the trails I ride. I would happily pay to do so, as I have more disposable income than spare time, but the catch being that I would want to be sure that the money went directly into the trails, and not to the council or whatever...


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 5:45 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Give it to me. I'll use it to pay off what I've spent on tools and after that, cakes.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 7:09 pm
Posts: 15458
Full Member
 

going uphill under my own power is what I enjoy most.

Really? Like, actually, really?

That was really the point, different people enjoy different aspects of cycling, including a bit of satisfaction from putting in an honest effort and achieving something for it, Other people buy e-bikes because otherwise they apparently couldn't venture so far into the big old outdoors.

So long as either party are happy with their choices, who really cares. I don't require your validation, and I expect you'll live without mine...


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 8:22 pm
Posts: 741
Full Member
 

Klunkers > front suspension > full suspension > disk brakes > E assist. Evolution innit.


 
Posted : 21/10/2016 11:22 pm
Posts: 1754
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Squirrel - Member
Klunkers > front suspension > full suspension > disk brakes > E assist. Evolution innit.

Evolution - right then - whats next?


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 12:19 am
Posts: 12667
Free Member
 

Wonder what the [s]heroes[/s] riders who like riding uphill would ride? Super light xc weapon to get to the top fast, or a super heavy POS to show how hard they are?

Kerley?

I use a rigid single speed, currently in the form of a fixed track bike that weighs around 7kg. I would like a down-lift sometimes as going 30+ mph on a lowish off road gearing has me spinning at 200rpm on mostly hard pack gravel with some softer bits which can be challenging...


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 7:23 am
Posts: 3994
Full Member
 

That sounds super fun! Still, each to their own


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 7:36 am
Posts: 24854
Free Member
 

I wonder how much erosion has been caused by mountain bikes (proper, pedally ones) evolving from the long stemmed steep angled rigid things of the 80's into the 6" FS models of today. These have opened it up to riders who previously wouldn't have been able to access certain types of trails, or if they had would have been forced to mince-walk down them.

We should ban all gnarpoons, because they cause more erosion than proper old style mountain bikes.

In fact, I think it's widely accepted that FS allows riders to ride farther faster by reducing the body discomfort of a rigid or hardtail. So rather than banning gnarpoons, all suspension should be banned, so only proper tough riders can do decent mileage.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 7:48 am
Posts: 5047
Full Member
 

Well, obviously then, cx bikes should be banned too, as their narrow tyres increase ground pressure.
Rigid, singlespeed fatbikes ftw.
😀


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 8:15 am
Posts: 24854
Free Member
 

and also walkers with small feet.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 8:17 am
Posts: 9597
Free Member
 

Evolution - right then - whats next?

Return to the source, man.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 8:57 am
Posts: 20979
 

Evolution - right then - whats next?

2018 specialized turbo levo.

[img] [/img]

Even solves any erosion [s]whinges[/s] issues


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 9:32 am
Posts: 1754
Full Member
Topic starter
 

ha ha Tomhoward - for once i agree with you 🙂


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 10:35 am
Posts: 17290
Full Member
 

Just seen a man on a supermarket bike wearing a great big ruck sack.There was a red cable coming out of the backpack and connected to something on his bike
He wasn't pedalling but he was was overtaking cars doing 30.
No registration plate, so not legal.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 11:49 am
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

You saw an idiot


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with theotherjohnv on the suspension ban.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 12:04 pm
Posts: 6318
Full Member
 

Took the toddler for a spin up on Haldon today, and at one point I was overtaken by a guy on a decent looking full-sus electric bike. He wasn't pedalling 😉
When we got back to the hub he was at the cafe and I had a chat with him about the bike. Don't worry I was really nice!
He was fully aware that it was illegal, and was a bit cagey about what he'd done, but said that he'd retro-fitted a throttle and bits he'd got online. He mentioned a forum where lots of people share info about hacking Ebikes - pedelecs.co.uk I think?
So if it's that easy, I suspect a lot of people will do it, or have it done.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 5:09 pm
Posts: 3066
Free Member
 

Klunkers > front suspension > full suspension > disk brakes > E assist. Evolution innit.

Y'see, I'd put it more like this:

People not wanting/able to ride uphill > bikes that are better at going down than up > uplift centres > e-assist bikes > electric motorbikes - after all, why even bother pedalling at all?

I've always suspected mountain biking lacked the ethical core of other outdoor pursuits such as rock climbing. It's now official - it has jumped the ethical shark.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 5:35 pm
Posts: 12667
Free Member
 

So if it's that easy, I suspect a lot of people will do it, or have it done.

Just the same as most people drive over 30mph in 30 mph areas, a lot of people still use their phones, i.e. a lot of people break what they see as minor laws but they are breaking them none the less.

Did you report the owner?


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 5:42 pm
Posts: 741
Full Member
 

People not wanting/able to ride uphill > bikes that are better at going down than up > uplift centres > e-assist bikes > electric motorbikes - after all, why even bother pedalling at all?

I've always suspected mountain biking lacked the ethical core of other outdoor pursuits such as rock climbing. It's now official - it has jumped the ethical shark

I'd agree with that. On the other hand I think road biking does have an "ethical core" (Go on, flame away 👿 )


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 5:45 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

WGAS? More folk outdoors enjoying themselves is good.

"Ethical Core" - really?


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 5:48 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

ing down than up > uplift centres > e-assist bikes > electric motorbikes - after all, why even bother pedalling at all?

I've always suspected mountain biking lacked the ethical core of other outdoor pursuits such as rock climbing. It's now official - it has jumped the ethical shark

Pretty much agree as well to a point. There are mtber's who buy into the value of cycling being a wholly human powered activity. But there is a subset that has always viewed pedalling as an inconvenience. Emtb's for them are a natural evolution. I just wish they could separate from main stream mtbing and go their own way.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:33 pm
Posts: 39735
Free Member
 

Would take less than 30 seconds to derestrict mine.

Plenty folk have done it.

How ever realising that flying along at apeeds that the bike isnt really set up to handle constantly and that its my skin that will be lost on the road reminds me that yep the speed limits there for good reason. And its pedal assisted because i want the exercise but i want to recover from harder sessions but not succumb to the car.

Is it black and white through taxi?

Last saturday i rode up teide from puerto de la cruz on a road bike in 4 hrs today i rode my ebike to the shops in jeans and a t shirt to pick up breakfast. Should i have got changed into my cycling clothes and put on my spds to go to to the shops on a "real bike"? Should i have walked for 2hrs ?


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:34 pm
Posts: 17780
Full Member
 

He wasn't pedalling but he was was overtaking cars doing 30.
No registration plate, so not legal.
And that had what impact on you?
People break much bigger laws than that all the time and no one seems to give a ****.
People getting sand in their vag over electric assist bikes is proper funny.
You must have nowt better to worry about. I suggest a dose of real life might sort you out. 😛


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:50 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

Is it black and white through taxi?

You're right it isn't, there will be people who cross over and do both. But the engine in a Emtb makes it different enough, for me anyway to regard it as something completely new. Nothing against engines I still race MX, but I'll never put one on a bicycle unless it was purely for transportation.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:51 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

I just wish they could separate from main stream mtbing and go their own way.

Wtf is "main stream mtbing"?


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:53 pm
Posts: 58
Free Member
 

Wtf is "main stream mtbing"?

As you so politely asked. Riding a mtb that doesn't have an engine. I presume your not stupid so it's a surprise you couldn't work that out yourself.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 6:58 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

I presume your not stupid so it's a surprise you couldn't work that out yourself.

Well I know the difference between your and you're so I'm not doing too badly thanks.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 7:00 pm
Posts: 17780
Full Member
 

As a side note it does seem interesting that people commenting on this thread that are genuinely fast on a bike seem to not have a problem with legal ebikes.
But some people that as far as I'm aware are just plodders like the rest of us seem to have a big issue with them.
Maybe it's an ego thing with some of the less robust of mind people.
I don't own an Ebike and have never even ridden one BTW but can see how an Edownhill bike could be brilliant on the local DH trails with no uplift.


 
Posted : 22/10/2016 7:14 pm
Page 5 / 6