Forum menu
Dave Yates & 29...
 

[Closed] Dave Yates & 29er's

Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1286780]

Anyone any feedback on Dave Yates and if he has built any 29er MTB's?

Thanks


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 9:18 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

This could be interesting! 😀


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 9:52 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

i was just doozing............;o)


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 9:55 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You guys! I saw 2 responses and got excited...


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 9:57 pm
Posts: 17783
Full Member
 

I wish you'd just get on with it and order something. 😉

You'll have enough time to worry inbetween signing the drawings off and it arriving. 😆


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 9:59 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

you can go on his course and build your own, so he must have a jig suitable for a 29r.
just never heared or seen a dave yates 29r, which leads me to think it would be a negative.


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

All custom 29er build routes have lead into cul-de-sacs ton...


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:05 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm not going to those US builders and paying ~1500 dollars, plus 100 postage, then 4%, plus handling, then 17.5% VAT

Total ~1400 pounds for a steel HT!


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:12 pm
Posts: 445
Free Member
 

talk to us, if you're ok to wait a bit?

Si


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:15 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

i bought 2 new 29rs this week........

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

18 - thanks for jumping in. Could I cut to the chase and publicly ask, if you don't mind, what ball park figure for a custom steel 29er MTB frame?

I remember a while ago asking and you saying you might be starting a custom build in this new year. Looks like you're going ahead then, and with 29er builds? Good luck and good to hear of another taking up the lead.


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:24 pm
Posts: 445
Free Member
 

how bout the really nice one?...


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:24 pm
Posts: 445
Free Member
 

ballpark - £1k

first cen pass for 140mm trail tubeset. more to come.

email me if you'd like to chat further?


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:26 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

18bikes - Member
how bout the really nice one?...

si, still trying to convince myself.
it is a hell of a lot of money for me to decide to get rid in a few months.
it will take a bit of shifting, if i did not take to it.


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 10:28 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

£1000 seems an awful lot for a steel frame, albeit custom, and seems, if I can say, towards the top end of what others are asking.

If I, or anyone else were thinking of a 29er mtb from you, what individual selling points could you put forward over any others?


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 11:32 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

£1000 seems an awful lot for a steel frame, albeit custom, and seems, if I can say, towards the top end of what others are asking.

Agreed - though I'd be interested what the tube spec was.
I'm not going to those US builders and paying ~1500 dollars, plus 100 postage, then 4%, plus handling, then 17.5% VAT

Total ~1400 pounds for a steel HT!


Waltworks, Curtlo et al should do you something for $1100 ish surely? Both respected with lots of 29er experience.

Pipedream did say to me they were thinking of a steel 29er with sliding drops - but probably not got the short chainstays and slack ha you want?? 😀

What about the new frames On-one are planning - steel and ti, shorter chainstays, slack(er) chainstays.


 
Posted : 02/02/2010 11:58 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, let's see what the tube specs are, but it doesn't bother me too much which tubes make the frame. Most are 4130 rears anyway. It's always more about the builder, which is why experience is more important than anything, and when you are talking a big for a 29er fork (120 TA Reba)...

Curtlo's wait list is currently ~4 months, but he is good on pricing (900 no paint), not sure of specific experience

Walt is snowed under (1200)

Siren - ~2 months and 1200. He has only made 1 LT 29er frame though

Steve Stickle - 2 months 1900


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:10 am
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

Comes back to the thread other day about custom UK frames - definately a hole in the market.


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:12 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's not a perfect world, so I might just sit tight and wait for the new wave of releases - On-One, Nimble 9, and you never know, Brant might just come in and save the day...


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:15 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

Steve Stickel rocks.


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 8:54 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

He sure does, I've been talking to him about possibilities.

But 1850 makes for a landed price of 1500 pounds.

A Nimble 9 is 550 dollars and I can buy direct from Nimble.

It wouldn't be a ByStickle, and I would compromise on fit, and.... blah...blah


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 9:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just a thought. Steel 29er under £1000? Niner MCR or SIR 9?

Matthew


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 9:20 am
Posts: 2448
Full Member
 

A niner sir 9 Or mcr is 853 throughout not just the main tubes.
Handling is awesome
frames are about £800
the xl size fits giants
you could get it repainted
so why go custom?

29er geometry is not the same as 26". And that is why some early 29ers were sluggish and barge like. Why risk an expensive custom build when their is a tried and tested and well rated off the peg option.

In the past I spent loads on custom surfboards. Some were dogs despite experience and consultation. I now just grab an off the peg surftech mass produced board and guess what... they are all brilliant. Niners are also brilliant.


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 9:31 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Clink - there was a custom 29er builder - but he couldn't make it work. Doesn't even post here any more.

Could there be a half way house on this? Custom made rather than bespoke? A bit like the suit makers - your dimensions get sent off to a factory and it is made up there rather than you dealing with the tailor in his shop.
The factories in Taiwan can make the prototypes that get made for testing etc - could On One / Ragley etc get bikes fabricated along those lines? Perhaps a range of dimensions that could be chosen from? I dunno - seems vaguely possible to me.


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Charlie - the Niners have 4130 stays

The frame I'm after is slack and super short in the rear


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 9:58 am
Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

If youre looking at a really short back ended 29er, have you thought about [url= http://julieracingdesig.canalblog.com/ ]Julie racing[/url]? They seem to tick the boxes and the bikes are pure porn too.

Don't see any prices on that website though...


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are you convinced that the geometry you want will work?

And you asked 18bikes for a ball park figure, which is not too far from other prices and the suggest it is too high?

Good luck with it.


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 10:47 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

My current ride has the exact geo I'm after, so in that regard I am certain

No feedback on Dave Yates then. I phoned last summer and his wife, who I have to say was less than helpful and put me right off

Another suggestion come in is Gunnar bikes (US)...


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:36 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

back to the original question about Dave Yates - wasn't one of the bikes built in the Mag feature on Dave Yates a 29er?


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

My next hardtail is def going to be a 29,road tyres for the commute at a decent rate,anybody tried fitting drops on one?


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

The frame I'm after is slack and super short in the rear

you know these super short chainstay 29ers? are they measuring them along the chainstay (the proper way), or horizontally from BB to wheel centre (cheating)?


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 953
Free Member
 

£1000 seems an awful lot for a steel frame, albeit custom, and seems, if I can say, towards the top end of what others are asking.

remind us how much trouble you've been having trying to find someone to build you this frame?


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 2:38 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ALOT 🙂

The frame I'm after is unusual and therefore requires builder's specific experience to ensure ending up with something which will work

There are quite a few builders around, and also one's who build 29er's, but there are very few with burly 29er trail bike experience

This is how I understand it. I really don't think 'pick any frame builder worthy of the title' goes here. I may be wrong

I asked 18 bikes what they could offer, as I understand they have newly tooled for 29er frames

1K is alot of money, but I would pay this for the right frame


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 3:25 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Chevin - Member

Just a thought. Steel 29er under £1000? Niner MCR or SIR 9?

Matthew

I owned a SIR9 - very nice steel feel to that ride


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 4:13 pm
Posts: 3
Free Member
Topic starter
 

brant - Member

you know these super short chainstay 29ers? are they measuring them along the chainstay (the proper way), or horizontally from BB to wheel centre (cheating)?

I've just measured the CS's on my Paradox and they are 16.9 BB to spindle centre

Banshee list the Paradox CS length as 16.9


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 4:14 pm
Posts: 3644
Full Member
 

Why is measuring horizontally cheating? Surely it is this dimension that is most relevant (position of vertical rider weight relative to tyre contact patch). Isn't this the dimension that influences the (mythical and much debated?) short chainstay / weight on the back wheel traction?

Measuring along the chainstay is only really useful for working out singlespeed wheel position / chain length / gear ratio combo.

And does it make much difference how you measure it anyway? I'm playing with a design for my own consumption (just about to order a pile of tubes). 29er ss, super short stays, slack-ish front and short rigid fork. Stays come in at 16.05" along the chainstay or 15.83" horizontal (so less than a quarter of an inch difference no matter how you measure it). And before anyone asks it does have mud clearance with fat tyres and regular crank spacing!

It will probably handle like a bus but who cares - if I don't like it then will just buy a few more tubes, melt apart the bad bits and try something else!

Carve your own niche.......


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 6:43 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

I think I should have put "cheating" in quotes, with a smiley.

I'm not a huge believer in chainstay length alone affecting a design, but as far as marketing/perception goes, a 1/4in can make a huge difference (apparently ;-))

16in with a 29er does sound very short indeed - but SS lets you do some tighter back ends. Did you have to go to 83mm BB and 150mm back end? I've always wanted to, but never got around to it, and it's commercially quite dumb (but the sort of thing you can do for custom).


 
Posted : 03/02/2010 7:04 pm
Posts: 3644
Full Member
 

I fully agree - I'm playing with something completely and utterly commercially dumb! 🙂

Just a nice excuse to play after work with gas bottles and practice on a new CAD package (can unroll the tubes to get mitre templates). And build something odd without being laughed at by a framebuilder.....

With conventional chainstays and ss, 16" still needs some pretty horrific crimping to fit between tyre and chainring. So maybe it needs unconventional chainstays - think back to how they solved this "problem" circa 1990 ;-).....


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 11:26 am
 jfeb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tell me you are not doing an E-stay 29er !?!


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 11:51 am
Posts: 3644
Full Member
 

Got it in one - give that man a Bula hat! As I said - commercially not viable 🙂

Only a very little teeny tiny elevation to get chainstay above a ss chain (not straight line from head tube to dropout like days of old).

Yeti Ultimate. Nishiki. Mantis. Roberts Stratos. Funk. Alpinestars. Mammoth. Ahhhhhh.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:26 pm
 jfeb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Damn you. You have forced me to remember my old Scott Super Evolution. What a horrid bike.

😉


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the funk ,, the first bike i "designed" was a copy of the funk while i was working at Harris performance they made a number for the customer they were great at the time,,

if it wasnt for the fashion pandas i think e stays have some good points short chainstay lengths ( if thats what you want)
lots of mud clearence
no chainsuck

must be carefull the cad package is open ,,,, no no no no no no


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

The other way to do e-stays is to drop the rear stay below the BB. So it's elevated in reverse. You can do this sometimes on a continuation of the downtube.

Supports the BB better for the pedalling load, and means it's less likely to fall off.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A bit like the early whyte preston swinging arms ,, there is a patent on that,, but someone forgot to add my name to it,,


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:44 pm
Posts: 3194
Free Member
 

In response to the OP: there have been plenty of reviews of Dave Yates' work over the years in the audax forums and magazines. Two of my road bikes do have his custom-built forks on them (arranged by local bike shops while he worked at M Steele Cycles ).

And one day I will do a Dave Yates frame-building class to build my next MTB.


 
Posted : 04/02/2010 12:47 pm
Page 1 / 2