Cyclocross Bikes
 

[Closed] Cyclocross Bikes

40 Posts
24 Users
0 Reactions
98 Views
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I am currently looking at selling my Singlespeed Tricross and getting a geared cylocross bike circa with a budget of about £1500 max

Other than the obvious ones such as Specialised, Kona etc any ideas? I am also happy to build form scratch...


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:25 am
Posts: 53
Free Member
 

Would be ti or nice steel for me.
Poss put a wnated ad in the classifieds - some one was selling an Indy Fab ti crosser a few months back which would be my dream bike.
J.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:29 am
Posts: 7508
Full Member
 

new cotic cyclocross bike looks nice too.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:43 am
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ooh that cotic is nice indeed....was also thinking of a custom frame (Lee Cooper).


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:46 am
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

To be honest Specialized doesn't really fit into the "obvious ones" for cross.
bmc, Redline, Ridley, Paul Milne, .........


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 10:08 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kinesis do completes,ragley rodwell,salsa.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 10:24 am
Posts: 1710
Free Member
 

Paul Milne are the obvious ones I guess. People seem to swear by them.
I am very impressed with the Scott cx I've just recently got. Really nice tight handling and good clearance on the rear stays.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Fixie Inc Pure Blood with last years fancy writing hmmmmmmmmm


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 11:50 am
Posts: 53
Free Member
 

I have riding a 2002 vintage Jake for last 3 or 4 years.
Proper battered but works really really well.
Geometry seems really sorted for me.
I would also consider one of those.
J.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 12:22 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Do you want it for riding or racing?
For racing, Milnes, Giant, Scott, Ridley, BMC, Geurcotti! Kona.
For just riding Genesis or anything niche so it's good to look at as well.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:09 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

ridley do some nice ones for around a grand.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:11 pm
 flip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Them Ragdley head tubes are tiny, can't imagine why, i'd need 6" of spacers 😥


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Its for riding - I do a 30 miles a day commuting on and off road. Plus some longer distance stuff at the weekend, but that's mainly road stuff.

I mainly looking at a change as I need gears for some of the longer journeys I do - but I don't have the space for a on/off road commuter, road bike and a mtb.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Focus have a nice carbon frame CX bike for roughly the same as your budget.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a focus and think its great for both racing and riding. Definetly worth a look.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 3
Full Member
 

Surly Cross Check?

Covers a lot of the road / off-road bases: takes 1.8" 29er knobblies / hubs can be either 130 or 135mm for a road or off-road set-up. Takes racks and mudguards so great for commuting / touring. Runs geared or singlespeed. Lots of options!

Huge fun to ride, the steel frame may not be the lightest / most technologically up-to-date but it rides really light.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 2:06 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I love the idea of steel, but the cross checks top tube slopes the wrong way for my liking!


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 2:20 pm
Posts: 1710
Free Member
 

Maybe what you really want is a tourer?

Cross bikes generally tend to not have too compact a frame as you need to get your shoulder under the top tube to carry it.
People I knew who had the old style Giant TCXs used to complain that they were fairly useless for carrying because they were too compact. Giant have redesigned them now though, and I have to say the new style ones do look like they could be pretty good.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

traildog - still a semi compact frame and ok for shouldering. Wouldn't recommend for touring though, definitely race geometry and no mudguard/rack eyes.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 3:35 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Coleman what's the max on that cassette youre using?

I'm trying to find out what the max was on my 9 speed 105.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 3:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oldgit - it's a 12-27 10speed Ultegra. The new 6700 is available in 11-28.

Edit;
Just remembered I've got a 9speed 12-27 Ultegra on another bike.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 3:51 pm
 Parr
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have a look at www.mscbikes.com there's a cyclocross bike in their range, frame and forks or full build


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That Giant is pretty sweet too. I am not worried about eyelets and guards, I never really do more than 100 miles in one go and I use a pack (have been forever)


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 6:22 pm
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

Ever since I have seen Coleman's Giant I want it. Please can you stop posting pictures.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 6:33 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
 

Coleman ... That giant is lovely, what size is it ?? ... lookin at the 2010 giant crossers myself


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 7:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dont forget the planet x uncle john. cheap as chips really


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 7:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cannondale CAAD9 - got one with 105 gears for about a grand, £1500 would get the ultegra version maybe?

Its a fantastic frame - looks the business and is tough and light, perhaps a bit stiff so works best on road or racing, I use mine mainly to do a 30 mile commute and 60 mile + rides.

Got eyelets on carbon fork, and a mount under wishbone stay which will take a Tubus rack, I bought a £5 seat clamp with mounts (M:part) and used the drop out mounts to fit a normal rack.

The cannondale is pretty rare but has an outstanding frame.

Here is the 2010 version, the 08 one had a better paint job though!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Love the colnago world cup.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 8:03 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

That picture of Coleman's Giant just made me do a sex-wee.

I looked at the Giants myself recently, but they're not importing them in xl sizes. 🙁


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

stumpy_m4 - The TCX is a medium 51.5cm with 55.5cm top tube & 110mm stem. I am 5' 11" if that helps.


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 30377
Full Member
 

That Cannondale is super tasty! How much?


 
Posted : 19/10/2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The Cannondale CX9 is £1299 and seems to have shockingly bad wheels for a bike of that price!!

But otherwise....v.nice


 
Posted : 20/10/2009 8:56 am
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just looked at a very nice 2009 Major Jake....it seems to tick all the right boxes!!


 
Posted : 20/10/2009 3:32 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

coleman that be the first giant ever that i think looks awesome.
looks like it could rip your head off.


 
Posted : 20/10/2009 3:44 pm
Posts: 8294
Free Member
 

traildog - Member
Paul Milne are the obvious ones I guess. People seem to swear by them.

I had a steel Milne cx bike about 11 - 12 years ago. It was possibly the worst bike I've had in the past 15 years - heavy, handled badly, toe overlap, felt sluggish, etc. The only good thing about it was that it was cheap.

A long time ago though, so maybe they've improved.


 
Posted : 20/10/2009 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nonk - Thanks. It's a pussycat really.


 
Posted : 20/10/2009 6:42 pm
Posts: 43
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just put a deposit down on a Major Jake!!


 
Posted : 23/10/2009 9:49 am
Posts: 1710
Free Member
 

IdleJon, I don't think that's the same as the Columbus frames that everyone now swears by. Still, I have never ridden one so they maybe terrible for all I know. Lots and lots of them at the races though.
Coleman, your Giant looks very nice. They are certainly look not as sloping now as they used to be. The Scott I have is also semi-compact and I do find it slightly harder to shoulder than my previous bike, but I am sure I'll get used to it.


 
Posted : 23/10/2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 8294
Free Member
 

You're right traildog I don't remember if the frame I had was even a named steel. They brought in alu frames shortly afterwards, but both were very popular at races.

Having said how bad mine was, I have to admit that I raced it loads, and I think I did the 3 Peaks on that one 3 times, so it can't have been all bad. I eventually bent it in a local race and replaced it with a Jake which is now in retirement, like myself, for the moment. (Maybe it'll be raced next season when I'm [i]bound[/i] to be a little sleeker.)


 
Posted : 23/10/2009 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My cannondale CAAD9 has RS10 wheels which are low budget for a £1250 bike, however they are light and very reliable - I would say that the 'dale has an outstanding frame and specced well in all the right places.

Would recommend this bike as a true all rounder, it replaced my road bike and i use for commutes, tours, training, racing... pretty much every day.


 
Posted : 24/10/2009 3:38 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

my old columbus from paul milnes
[IMG] [/IMG]
my latest all rounder monster with guard and rack and bottle mounts. none of which the columbus had.
[IMG] [/IMG]

as for what to get depends on what you plan to do. for your needs id go for a columbus and get a nice build done on it for that cash


 
Posted : 24/10/2009 3:43 pm