[i]presumably the company will get a well done/thumbs up if they do something to prevent this sort of thing happening again. [/i]
I would certainly add to hear or twitter anything positive I found out or was told. Not heard from them yet, though.
All companies are the same, though, one person complains they fob them off. Lots of people complain or it gets in the press and then things happen.
That's absolutely awful. I hope the cyclist is ok.
If the cyclist had it on film why didn't he just send it to the police and then call the caravan company? Why would you put it on youtube?
All the early comments on this thread of "I'll never use them again blah blah blah" seem a bit silly as it was one of the drivers being a tool who should be sacked and prosecuted.
[i]Unfortunately I cannot work out his registration or company name. if anyone can help....[/i]If the cyclist had it on film why didn't he just send it to the police and then call the caravan company? Why would you put it on youtube?
If the cyclist had it on film why didn't he just send it to the police and then call the caravan company? Why would you put it on youtube?
He may well have gone to the police but with matters like this the police are generally uninterested. No one was hurt, no actual damage done so there's little to no risk of the driver being prosecuted.
It goes on youtube and yes there is the indignant fury of people completely unaffected by this however there is more chance of that driver being punished for what was an extremely dangerous, irresponsible and anti social action through bringing his company into disrepute.
He was representing a company at the time of the incident, the company have a responsibility to deal with this, it sounds like they are. I'd be interested to hear of any outcome
Unfortunately I cannot work out his registration or company name. if anyone can help..
Where did you find that? I must be a bit stupid.
He was representing a company at the time of the incident, the company have a responsibility to deal with this, it sounds like they are. I'd be interested to hear of any outcome
Agreed. But why is this thread called caravaners vote with your wallets?
And why are people saying they will be avoiding this company?
If a Ford Focus comes too close will these same people be boycotting Ford?
[i]If a Ford Focus comes too close will these same people be boycotting Ford? [/i]
If it were driven by a Ford employee on company business I'd question their ability to choose employees who exercise good judgement and therefore whether I should be buying a product from them.
I think as vulnerable road users the only real way we have of making companies force their drivers into behaving sensibly is to use our spending money. We can't fight them on the roads, we'll lose.
There's a number of companies local to me I won't use because of how their staff choose to drive vehicles around the city. It's not much but it's pretty much all I can do.
text shown at the end of the footageWhere did you find that? I must be a bit stupid.
that's utterly terrifying.
A company doesn't employ staff whom knowingly will give them a bad name.
There is no doubt that the driver should be dismissed with immediate effect based on endangering the lives of others and bringing the companies name into disripute.
If the police do nothing (wich they probably won't) the driver will probably not work locally again for a very long time.
Why would you want to do anything to the caravan people? They just had a bad driver.
They won't be the first employer who'se had to sack an employee for endangering lives.
If they go down the route of that you suggest then I would consider using them.
In the meantime, not.
text shown at the end of the footage
I missed that but saw this underneath the film on youtube.
Published on Mar 6, 2014
This person put me in great danger by sounding his horn and passing very close by with a large vehicle at speed. Shame I can't work out his number plate etc but if anyone wants the original file to try please ask.
Sorry about the swearing.
Forest of Dean say it looks like one of there wagons but need to talk to the driver.
Had a letter from the MD of the company saying the same. please give the company time to investigate this and follow there procedures etc.
They do seam a good company and have responed very well.
May I say thanks for identifieing the company and may people have also contacted the company as well.
Thanks to all.
Will update when I have more information.
JTHEF
A similar thing happened to me while cycling from Rugby to Dunchurch about 2005. I was approaching the roundabout near the supermarket and a white van did the same. There is a shared path which I was not using as it was usually full of pushchairs and street furniture. I said very similar things as the white van tried to take an impression of my body with it's steel side. I try not to cycle on the road these days!
iolo - pretty sure that a lot of the text was added this morning, originally it stopped at the swearing bit.
even if it's the most pristine, smooth, billiard-table-flat cycle path with nothing in it apart from empty space and a guaranteed wad of tenners at the end of your journey should you use it, there's absolutely no compulsion to do so. you have every right to not cycle on it.
some more info from the company on the road.cc report;
[url= http://road.cc/content/news/113083-video-caravan-firm-horrified-after-cyclist-suffers-shocking-near-miss ]http://road.cc/content/news/113083-video-caravan-firm-horrified-after-cyclist-suffers-shocking-near-miss[/url]
Jeepers, trailer as well just to make it worse, that's the real scary part as you think its over then it carries on, not to mention the pull created as it passes! Feel angry watching that!
It's not as though the cyclist provoked such an act of stupid driving.
There is no way the driver could have said he didn't see the cyclist.
Driving ban at the very least.
My bottom clenched when I watched it so I would imagine the chap on the bike could have crushed a marble with his ring when that happened.
Depends how you look at it. The driver was on company time in company livery so the company has already done the wrong thing.
I hope some random employee wherever you work, that you've never met, doesn't do something stupid and cost you your job when the company suffers a loss of business after an "internerd attack" then.
(You will no doubt tell me why that couldn't happen to you, but you get my point)
How staff behave when they are company time is very much the responsibility of the company and by implication the management and owners. The HSE certainly sees it that way. If I was in that position then I would want to rely on more than hope.I hope some random employee wherever you work, that you've never met, doesn't do something stupid and cost you your job when the company suffers a loss of business after an "internerd attack" then.
If I was in that position then I would want to rely on more than hope.
You would have [b]literally[/b] nothing else to rely on.
How can a company with loads of drivers (or whatever) guarantee that none of them will ever do anything stupid.
Totally impossible.
What they need to do is react appropriately [b]*when[/B] it happens.
*because it will.
That's properly frightening. Not just a close call. The guy must have been an inch or two from death. And for what purpose?
Don't usually post on these threads for numerous reasons, but on this occasion it appears to be a case of plain crazy, very dangerous and totally unnecessary behaviour from the lorry driver and absolutely unprovoked. I hope they are dealt with appropriately by the employer and by the law. there's no excuse for deliberately trying to make a point by putting someone in great danger.
Controversy will kick in here as well.There is a clearly marked shared use cycle lane on the pavement on the left - you can see the blue sign at the junction.
I think the driver was using the punishment pass to 'tell' the cyclist to use the shared use path rather than the road.
Hopefully that's what he says when interviewed - assuming that is the police decide to take any action at all. Or at least that was my initial thought. Unfortunately as always if he does get prosecuted he'll be in front of a jury of his peers - that is peers of the driver, not peers of the cyclist - they might well agree with the driver. I'd suggest that video on it's own is evidence of at least careless driving, given the standard clearly falls below that of all the other drivers who overtake, so we have a clear baseline of "competent and careful" to judge against. If only such cases actually worked that way.
[quote=nealglover]As shocking as the video is, and there is no excuse for that sort of driving at all.
I don't really like the idea of the internet keyboard warrior slur campaign on the company involved.
It seems like it's an instant reaction to start repeatedly typing the company name in posts to ruin their business/reputation before they are even aware that there is something they need to deal with.
Give them a chance to react first ffs.
Hopefully the company do the right thing and he gets sacked.
What is more important - some two bit caravan haulage firm, or someones life?
If cases like this had proper serious outcomes (driver in the jail, firm out of business), perhaps it would make proper news? And perhaps then some of the retards doing this kind of driving would think twice about their unacceptable actions?
It is indicative of the awful, combustion engine centric mindset, that makes a lot of British drivers feel entitled to have everyone scatter out their way because they are bigger / faster / harder.
In the unlikely event the driver is caught, he'll probably face no action, or a small fine plus a couple of points or undertake a driver improvement programme. That'll teach him.
This companies vehicles are a menace round here. I get a double dose at the moment as a local road closure means that they have to come by my gate to get anywhere. Actually I suspect 1 driver as over the years, every time I have been cut up by one its the same chap I think. Been touched twice in the last few years by a towed caravan. Their vehicles are rather long for the local roads but as they were here many years ago it wouldn't be fair to complain about that aspect. (and I am a firm believer in the idea that if your vehicle can't cope with the prevailing road conditions then it shouldn't be there)
Knowing a bit about the company ownership I suspect that some harsh words have been said at the minimum to that driver. I look forward to the result.
well having a company policy of "dont be a dick on the roads while you're working for us" and treating shit like this seriously would certainly help.How can a company with loads of drivers (or whatever) guarantee that none of them will ever do anything stupid.
Driver getting properly disciplined by the company sounds reasonable to me, not sure why nikk thinks the company going under is a good idea (unless they have form for employing known dangerous drivers) [b]if[/b] any legal action happens driver will get slapped wrists, not happy about that but it's not going to change today, this company can take a stand against punishment passes and treatment of vulnerable road users today tho.
<edit> ah Matt posted while I was typing, you reckon just 1 driver then? Have you reported incidents the company has ignored Matt?
What is more important - some two bit caravan haulage firm, or someones life?
Why does it have to be one or the other ?
They are both important. That's exactly my point.
If you earned your living as a good employee for a "two bit caravan haulage company" you might feel a bit different.
You must be trying [b]really[/b] hard to not see my point 😕
If I put the life of a member of the public at risk with a stupid stunt like that, whilst on company business, I would fully expect to be sacked on the spot.
Shouting, swearing at the public for example, warrant [i]disciplinary action[/i], but there is simply no other action for something like that than instant dismissal. Absolutely shocking. 😥
few people said this but who thinks its actually going to happen? True if you endangered a member of the public with any other piece of work equipment you'd probably be putting your job at risk but road attitudes are all messed up, 90% of the public would cry "the sack?! For [b]not [/b]hitting a cyclist?"but there is simply no other action for something like that than instant dismissal. Absolutely shocking.
@ neil - I hope the other employees of the caravan company would expect prompt and effective action to retain their employer's reputation.
@ neil - I hope the other employees of the caravan company would expect prompt and effective action to retain their employer's reputation.
I can't see any reason why they wouldn't.
We might hear some news on Monday then.
Further to mattsccm's comments it's possible that the driver is a family member or, if not, then a long-standing employee. It'll be interesting to see if the local press pick up on the story. I've never had a problem locally with their vehicles but I was nearly taken out by a McArthys drawbar trailer rig last year in the FoD and it really is a heart-in-mouth moment 😐
That is ****ing unbelievable, I've never seen anything as bad as that before.
I shall never use Forest of Dean caravans to buy or rent a caravan in the Forest of Dean.
Even if I am desperate for a caravan in the forest if dean.
🙄
Pete
linked it to a mate reporting to the Citizen. May not be of interest of course.
Whilst in no way condoning the behaviour of the driver and being perfectly aware that you are not obliged to use the share use cycle path....in that particular circumstance I think it would be my preferred option - looks a horrible road to cycle on.
Looks a fine road to cycle on apart from a single homicidal lorry driver. Not huge amounts of traffic, plenty of space for vehicles to overtake, which in all but one case they use. As opposed to having to stop and give way at all the side roads on the cycle path.
Options differ! Personally I tend to chose quieter roads. I've never cycled along there but when driving it it is either nose to tail or very fast moving traffic.
Prefer quieter roads myself convert thing is quieter roads tend to be narrower, twisty (blind corners) and invariably nsl while traffic volume is a lot lower I'm not sure your chances if you do get passed, are any better. The road in the OP as aracer points out should be safe.
In a car if you had the choice of a residential rd with a load of unmarked junctions where you have to give way (slow down and into second gear for unmarked junctions my instructor insisted) or a parallel "main" road where you have right of way pretty much all drivers would take the express route, so it's a bit perverse that drivers get all arsey when cyclists make the equivalent choice.
The driver has been fired.
How did you find that out?
Wow 😯
Fair do's to them!
