Well.. just had a reply from Hope to the effect of "the crank arm was not fully pushed onto the axle resulting in it snapping and replacement axles are available"
So my fault then!! Well that may be true but in all honesty I put the crank arm on the spline and gave it absolutely loads of Welly to "seat onto the axle shoulder" in fact I was worried I'd over done it so for the love of all things I'm not sure what else I could have done. And I don't remember seeing in their instructions about checking "visually" to see if seated on the shoulder.... I'm sure it just says till it comes to a stop... Which it did!!
Anyway... Right peeved with Hope here TBH and thought they would have been a little less abrupt so I'll not re-fit the hopes and leave the XTs now.
Hurrumph....
I got a Hope Evo crankset a few months ago and I'm not impressed. Very difficult to get rid of play. I'm also having to check and readjust every 2 or 3 rides. I followed the fitting Instructions to the letter and used a torque wrench. I've used XT/XTR in the past and they have been fit and forget. I'll be going back to them.
How about a Bb non-drive side bearing failing after 140km?
Lovely cranks, but with their own specific 30mm BB that costs £80?
Just bought some Shimano SLX cranks, chainring and BB for not much more than a Hope BB replacement!
My hope crank axle broke, speaking to my lbs at the time they had seen several. Hope tried to tell me they had never heard of the issue. Luckily i caught mine when stripping the bike down for a service. The design is frankly shoddy. Albeit I have yet to see if it’s improved on their revised version of the crank. Overpriced, heavy and over complicated. Obviously the Hope fanbois will try and deflect blame elsewhere.
This cracking/shearing a crank axle simply just shouldn't happen in these modern times of riding
If it were square taper for example then I'd accept/believe it
It's yet another item of kit that is not fit for purpose
I'd expect Hope considering they're meant to have decent CS to acknowledge this and put in for a recall and see riders right
If not then I'd expect to see a lot spending less on other brands on chunks of alloy
Hope cranks are the one Hope product I was glad to get rid of. At £30 for a replacement axle, £17 each for the 30mm bearings I should've binned it a long time ago.
Did you ever hear back from Hope?
Did you ever hear back from Hope?
Um up there
https://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/bloody-hope-cranks-have-snapped-grrrr/page/2/#post-11156165
I did pretty much that to a set of XTs a few years ago.
760s or 770s - I can't remember.
I was in granny ring going up a climb at the time.
now that Shimano is finally on the direct mount bandwagon, I can't see any reason to go down the bling/30mm axle route.
30mm BBs don't last as long IME as they use smaller bearings, and cost more (although that's not an engineering argument).
30mm axles are softer aluminium so pit more easily that 24mm steel.
DUB is 30mm in a different jumper.
All we need now is the aftermarket chainring manufacturers to make Shimano spline rings.
Hope seem to be completely hit or miss, I've had some awful hubs, and some that have been bombproof, no rhyme nor reason as to why. The current Pro4 hubs came with my Bronson, and have been very much in the bomb proof category, but others have had awful bother with them, which I did with both pro2 and pro2evo. Never had any bother with their headsets, they're my go to.
And it's the reason I'd never buy their brakes, too expensive to risk dodgy friday tolerances.
I wouldn't touch the cranks, well, cos they are pretty ugly!.
I'm still convinced that the problems people are having (snapped axles, play, premature bearing death) are due to getting the installation wrong.
I've got the original (non-Evo) cranks and it's actually not at all intuitive to put them together and tighten everything up correctly. I'd also be willing to bet that a lot of bike shops screw up the installation.
Premature bearing failure is classic symptom of incorrect installation. I too think the installation is an part of this. Hope themselves are a decent company and wouldn't have sent these things out to customers if there were not fully satisfied they were good. They will have tested these things a lot with some pretty sh1t hot riders putting the cranks through duty us mere mortals couldn't bring to bear in a lifetime of riding, but the big difference is the cranks would have been installed properly. My Hope cranks have been fine so far (touch wood) and bearing are still running fine after a couple of years, but it did take me about 3 or 4 attempts at installation before I was satisfied i'd done it correctly and I dread the time I have to remove the cranks again. So easy to do it wrong and get away with it and continue riding blissfully unaware you're over-stressing certain components.
I'm always suspicious of any component that require special tools. If you need special tools it means you've not really done the best job on the fundamental design in the first place. The fact they've renewed the design and made it simpler to install without the use of special tools is effectively an admission their first gen cranks were not 'fully optimised'.
All we need now is the aftermarket chainring manufacturers to make Shimano spline rings
Absolute Black already do. Got a 28T oval on my Rocket Max.
Yep... Heard back from Hope after I sent them a load of photos and was told it was my fault as the crank arm was not fully pressed into the spline (which they could see from the image). New axles are available from a reseller was their end statement, so I've ordered one from Winstanleys (let's not go there as I've not received anything yet!!).
I appreciate the crank arm was not fully home....but...the installation instructions simply say "drive crank arm onto spline until it comes to a hard stop". In truth I did this up so hard I was sure I'd overdone it? So I now wonder if the spline was out of shape to prevent the arm going on fully as I cannot see how it wouldn't have pressed on fully?
Anyway I'll be sticking with the Shimano ones and selling the hope I reckon.
+1 the installation procedure for the 1st gen Hopes is not intuitive at all, and I still pull up the official Hope instructions every time I install/disassemble just to remind me what does what.
Not had any issues with mine yet but I still wince at giving it 70Nm...
Not had any issues with mine yet but I still wince at giving it 70Nm…
This comes up now and again, but Shimano (whatever you might think about their glacial adoption of emerging fashions) really got it right with HT2 - it needs one, 5mm hex at 12-14nm, and a knurled knob tightened to finger tight with a cheap, plastic tool. Never had one come loose when fitted correctly, and are quickly and easily removed for maintenance.
I love Hope stuff, but won't be rushing to buy the cranks.
Agree on HTII being the sweet spot. The extra weight of a steel 24mm axle vs an alloy 30mm is nothing when you think it's down low, central and sprung mass. Add in the low torques required and the decent size bearings that are cheap to replace and you realise that Shimano really nailed it first time out. Currently got RaceFace Cinch 30mm chainsets on 2 bikes and am seriously wondering what benefit they give me over an SLX, even the direct mount doesn't really affect me as I don't go lower than a 32T ring.
SRAM cranks - they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof... Even easier than HT2...
SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…
Sram is easy but HTII takes the win, can be a bit of a pain to get the crank-arm thread to bite into the axle sometimes IME, need a third hand
ive had a hope BB, crank set and headset for over 2 years now and been spot on. Never had any problems. Me mate just got the new YT Izzo pro race and his sram carbon crank set snapped in the first week of riding it.
daern
MemberThis comes up now and again, but Shimano (whatever you might think about their glacial adoption of emerging fashions) really got it right with HT2 – it needs one, 5mm hex at 12-14nm, and a knurled knob tightened to finger tight with a cheap, plastic too
Yup. I'm a tart so I'm always looking at newer flasher lighter stuff, but all my bikes have cheap old XTR cranks on- they just work, and are only a handful of grams heavier than my raceface carbon ones frinstance which did not work.
Hope has always seemed like a lot of money for stuff which is mostly just cut from a billet.
They seem to enjoy using cnc machinery to make hundreds of different bits.
I think we've been paying for those machine upgrades since 1990.
I find it's things like servicing, the bearings being a prime example. You look at something like the bulb and the main bearing behind the freehub is gigantic, but todays [pro 2/evo/4 the bearings are thin, and id expect from that to be lighter and flimsier.
Cost of them has rocketed, so you're looking at 40 quid for new bearings, plus either the drifts to fit them yourself at another 40 quid, or a shop to do it for not far off that. is it any wonder people just buy a new hub when the bearings expire.
Certainly I'm seeing a lot of dismantled hope wheels, usually sold without the freehub, which mostly being alloy gets ripped up more than ive ever seen a freehub damaged such. Almost like lets create this part so it also as a finite life. Personally the only reason I can see that they dropped the Ti freehub, was because it was so good.
Shimano have it in the bag. Simple installation and safety built in without the rediculous torque values required on other cranksets. I'm out as soon as 'wave washers' and 'adjusting collars' are mentioned in any chainset blurb.
Because it's so easy not to overtighten a Shimano set! Half the damn tools circumvent the idea of the proper tool. Also relying on 'finger tight' is never a good plan.
With regards to 70Nm torque being too much, and therefore ignored.
I think we need to appreciate just how much torque larger threads can take.
For example grade 4.6 steel M24 bolt (diameter 24mm) can be tightened to 320Nm. We need to account for aluminium threads, but even then we get to 100Nm. Thread pitch, lubricated threads etc will also have impact on torques.
So I guess if an manufacturer bothers to specify a torque it was done for a good reason..
Having said all that Shimano cranks are ace!
Shimano cranks never get stuck on. That XT one i had to angle grind off because one of the hex bolts rounded must have been a figment of my imagination
hex bolts rounded
More magically self-rounding bolts! 🙂
Shimano cranks never get stuck on. That XT one i had to angle grind off because one of the hex bolts rounded must have been a figment of my imagination
Why on earth would you angle grind it off just because of a rounded bolt head?
SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…
You forgot the bar extension to get them undone (and the 2mm to do up the preload collar). And I still haven't worked out why the cap on the self-extracting bolt disappeared mid-ride on mine, meaning I had to buy a new one to get it off.
More magically self-rounding bolts! 🙂
Nothing magic about it. Previous owner didn't look after it properly. Salt and mud in the threads and probably over-tightened.
Why on earth would you angle grind it off just because of a rounded bolt head?
Because it was rounded off and wouldn't undo and the bolt heads are set into the crank arm. And it was the inner one.
User error leading to damaged parts. Not just an issue with Hope cranks.
I guess in the heat of the moment good judgment goes out of the window? Rather that wait and think we just get on with it and in the process make it worse.
Friend of mine (who is a good engineer) tried to use his expensive torque wrench to undo a bolt. Said bolt had already defeated his breaker bar. happens to the best of us!
No mention of the Superstar crank fitting tool (aka a rock)?
I've just a torque wrench to undo bolts before. The massively tight crank bolt on a car engine, was the only thing I wcould get in the gap between engine and chassis and at an angle I could actual apply force to it. Still had to use my leg! I did set it to a ery high torque value first though and it didn't click.
Me mate just got the new YT Izzo pro race and his sram carbon crank set snapped in the first week of riding it.
On the flip side, I've two sets of X01 carbon cranks that between them are not far away from 2million feet of descending in 6 years. Retired one set as the axle shaft was finally too worn and the other one is heading the same way.
SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…
...apart from the 50 or 60nm torque to fasten them up. And that to get play out of them, you just need to put a bit more grease on the splines. And then there's the wavey washer, and stupid gap on the drive side designed to collect dirt. And the god-awful OEM GXP BBs which only last for a few weeks.
Otherwise, they're great 😉 (actually - the one thing going for them is that they do a 155mm NX crankset, which is great for kids. Just don't use SRAM bearings with it!)
Shimano cranks never get stuck on. That XT one i had to angle grind off because one of the hex bolts rounded must have been a figment of my imagination
To be fair, you're not the only one to round-off those bolts, which are alloy rather than steel. I have a nice bag of replacement steel bolts in the garage and they are the first thing I swap on any new HT2 crankset. Much harder to round-off then 🙂
rydster
MemberHope has always seemed like a lot of money for stuff which is mostly just cut from a billet.
You want to hear something funny? When they switched the brakes to forgings, they still kept marketing them as machined from billet, presumably because they'd spent so long convincing their fans that it was better than forging and it was embarassing to admit they'd upgraded.
So it looks like I may owe Hope an apology and accept the mea culpa...
I got the replacement axle a couple of days ago and decided to just give the things one more go. Turns out I'm a twerp and only used both bottom bracket spacers thus reducing the length the axle protrudes by enough to prevent the crank arm pushing all the way home. This is what caused the failure so I'm off to eat a decent slice of humble pie and give myself a good talking to.
Oops!
Fair play for owning up buddy. Hopefully won’t be a problem again.
Good on you for coming clean! Surprised it makes such a difference
Yeah, fair play to you for 'fessing up. At least you have the satisfaction of finding out what had gone wrong
Cranks are one of those areas where I pissed about with fancy bling shite for a while but now just stick to Shimano.
Whoops! Fair play though.
On HT2 pinch bolts, why would they round off if you are tightening them properly? Ever wondered why they are alloy?
