Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 105 total)
  • Bloody Hope cranks have snapped…. Grrrr
  • twonks
    Full Member

    In the grand scheme of bolt fastening, 70Nm isn’t a lot but it is a fair bit to go through the average bike tool kit of a half decent allen key set.

    On a 300mm long 1/2″ square drive socket set it would be pushing or pulling with the equivalent strength to lift around 23Kg.

    On the average shorter allen key it would be even more, probably have it twisting a fair bit and requiring a bar over it to stop it hurting your hand.

    I really like Hope kit but this does seem a tad ridiculous.

    reggiegasket
    Free Member

    why is the bearing still on the axle on the non-driveside?

    Surely the bearing should be still in the frame/BB… Given the snap is right where the bearing sits on the driveside, I’m wondering if this has played a part.

    But don’t get me wrong, the 1st gen Hope cranks are a bad design and a right faff to fit and even worse to disassemble (I have some).

    junglistjut
    Free Member

    How did all those gauge marks get on there ? I had mine apart last week after 18 months of solid use and it didn’t look anything like that.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Scary stuff failing like that.

    I had a set of Truvative cranks that failed – after a rocky ride they were creaking. When I took off the bolt holding them on I discovered a spiral fracture from the splines, starting just where the threads inside started. With all the machining that exact spot was the thinnest and also the change from ‘supported’ by crank to the daft SRAM plastic covers to the actual bearing surface.

    Once again, I’m a Shimano fan here.

    Brianblessed
    Free Member

    ndthornton.. “I dont think the none driveside crank was installed properly”..
    primary cause of Hope gen 1 crank shaft failure.
    P.S, I had a set of xt cranks do the same thing a few years ago.

    donks
    Free Member

    Well.. just had a reply from Hope to the effect of “the crank arm was not fully pushed onto the axle resulting in it snapping and replacement axles are available”

    So my fault then!! Well that may be true but in all honesty I put the crank arm on the spline and gave it absolutely loads of Welly to “seat onto the axle shoulder” in fact I was worried I’d over done it so for the love of all things I’m not sure what else I could have done. And I don’t remember seeing in their instructions about checking “visually” to see if seated on the shoulder…. I’m sure it just says till it comes to a stop… Which it did!!

    Anyway… Right peeved with Hope here TBH and thought they would have been a little less abrupt so I’ll not re-fit the hopes and leave the XTs now.
    Hurrumph….

    Paradiso
    Free Member

    I got a Hope Evo crankset a few months ago and I’m not impressed. Very difficult to get rid of play. I’m also having to check and readjust every 2 or 3 rides. I followed the fitting Instructions to the letter and used a torque wrench. I’ve used XT/XTR in the past and they have been fit and forget. I’ll be going back to them.

    davcow
    Free Member

    How about a Bb non-drive side bearing failing after 140km?
    Lovely cranks, but with their own specific 30mm BB that costs £80?

    Just bought some Shimano SLX cranks, chainring and BB for not much more than a Hope BB replacement!

    russyh
    Free Member

    My hope crank axle broke, speaking to my lbs at the time they had seen several.  Hope tried to tell me they had never heard of the issue.  Luckily i caught mine when stripping the bike down for a service.  The design is frankly shoddy.  Albeit I have yet to see if it’s improved on their revised version of the crank.  Overpriced, heavy and over complicated.  Obviously the Hope fanbois will try and deflect blame elsewhere.

    tdog
    Free Member

    This cracking/shearing a crank axle simply just shouldn’t happen in these modern times of riding
    If it were square taper for example then I’d accept/believe it
    It’s yet another item of kit that is not fit for purpose

    I’d expect Hope considering they’re meant to have decent CS to acknowledge this and put in for a recall and see riders right

    If not then I’d expect to see a lot spending less on other brands on chunks of alloy

    carlos
    Free Member

    Hope cranks are the one Hope product I was glad to get rid of. At £30 for a replacement axle, £17 each for the 30mm bearings I should’ve binned it a long time ago.

    Flaperon
    Full Member

    Did you ever hear back from Hope?

    bruneep
    Full Member
    igm
    Full Member

    I did pretty much that to a set of XTs a few years ago.

    760s or 770s – I can’t remember.

    I was in granny ring going up a climb at the time.

    reggiegasket
    Free Member

    now that Shimano is finally on the direct mount bandwagon, I can’t see any reason to go down the bling/30mm axle route.

    30mm BBs don’t last as long IME as they use smaller bearings, and cost more (although that’s not an engineering argument).

    30mm axles are softer aluminium so pit more easily that 24mm steel.

    DUB is 30mm in a different jumper.

    All we need now is the aftermarket chainring manufacturers to make Shimano spline rings.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    Hope seem to be completely hit or miss, I’ve had some awful hubs, and some that have been bombproof, no rhyme nor reason as to why. The current Pro4 hubs came with my Bronson, and have been very much in the bomb proof category, but others have had awful bother with them, which I did with both pro2 and pro2evo. Never had any bother with their headsets, they’re my go to.

    And it’s the reason I’d never buy their brakes, too expensive to risk dodgy friday tolerances.

    I wouldn’t touch the cranks, well, cos they are pretty ugly!.

    NewRetroTom
    Full Member

    I’m still convinced that the problems people are having (snapped axles, play, premature bearing death) are due to getting the installation wrong.
    I’ve got the original (non-Evo) cranks and it’s actually not at all intuitive to put them together and tighten everything up correctly. I’d also be willing to bet that a lot of bike shops screw up the installation.

    wobbliscott
    Free Member

    Premature bearing failure is classic symptom of incorrect installation. I too think the installation is an part of this. Hope themselves are a decent company and wouldn’t have sent these things out to customers if there were not fully satisfied they were good. They will have tested these things a lot with some pretty sh1t hot riders putting the cranks through duty us mere mortals couldn’t bring to bear in a lifetime of riding, but the big difference is the cranks would have been installed properly. My Hope cranks have been fine so far (touch wood) and bearing are still running fine after a couple of years, but it did take me about 3 or 4 attempts at installation before I was satisfied i’d done it correctly and I dread the time I have to remove the cranks again. So easy to do it wrong and get away with it and continue riding blissfully unaware you’re over-stressing certain components.

    I’m always suspicious of any component that require special tools. If you need special tools it means you’ve not really done the best job on the fundamental design in the first place. The fact they’ve renewed the design and made it simpler to install without the use of special tools is effectively an admission their first gen cranks were not ‘fully optimised’.

    JonEdwards
    Free Member

    All we need now is the aftermarket chainring manufacturers to make Shimano spline rings

    Absolute Black already do. Got a 28T oval on my Rocket Max.

    donks
    Free Member

    Yep… Heard back from Hope after I sent them a load of photos and was told it was my fault as the crank arm was not fully pressed into the spline (which they could see from the image). New axles are available from a reseller was their end statement, so I’ve ordered one from Winstanleys (let’s not go there as I’ve not received anything yet!!).

    I appreciate the crank arm was not fully home….but…the installation instructions simply say “drive crank arm onto spline until it comes to a hard stop”. In truth I did this up so hard I was sure I’d overdone it? So I now wonder if the spline was out of shape to prevent the arm going on fully as I cannot see how it wouldn’t have pressed on fully?

    Anyway I’ll be sticking with the Shimano ones and selling the hope I reckon.

    reggiegasket
    Free Member

    +1 the installation procedure for the 1st gen Hopes is not intuitive at all, and I still pull up the official Hope instructions every time I install/disassemble just to remind me what does what.

    Not had any issues with mine yet but I still wince at giving it 70Nm…

    daern
    Free Member

    Not had any issues with mine yet but I still wince at giving it 70Nm…

    This comes up now and again, but Shimano (whatever you might think about their glacial adoption of emerging fashions) really got it right with HT2 – it needs one, 5mm hex at 12-14nm, and a knurled knob tightened to finger tight with a cheap, plastic tool. Never had one come loose when fitted correctly, and are quickly and easily removed for maintenance.

    I love Hope stuff, but won’t be rushing to buy the cranks.

    reluctantjumper
    Full Member

    Agree on HTII being the sweet spot. The extra weight of a steel 24mm axle vs an alloy 30mm is nothing when you think it’s down low, central and sprung mass. Add in the low torques required and the decent size bearings that are cheap to replace and you realise that Shimano really nailed it first time out. Currently got RaceFace Cinch 30mm chainsets on 2 bikes and am seriously wondering what benefit they give me over an SLX, even the direct mount doesn’t really affect me as I don’t go lower than a 32T ring.

    Superficial
    Free Member

    SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…

    lewzz10
    Free Member

    SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…

    Sram is easy but HTII takes the win, can be a bit of a pain to get the crank-arm thread to bite into the axle sometimes IME, need a third hand

    johnas7
    Free Member

    ive had a hope BB, crank set and headset for over 2 years now and been spot on. Never had any problems. Me mate just got the new YT Izzo pro race and his sram carbon crank set snapped in the first week of riding it.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    daern
    Member

    This comes up now and again, but Shimano (whatever you might think about their glacial adoption of emerging fashions) really got it right with HT2 – it needs one, 5mm hex at 12-14nm, and a knurled knob tightened to finger tight with a cheap, plastic too

    Yup. I’m a tart so I’m always looking at newer flasher lighter stuff, but all my bikes have cheap old XTR cranks on- they just work, and are only a handful of grams heavier than my raceface carbon ones frinstance which did not work.

    dyna-ti
    Full Member

    Hope has always seemed like a lot of money for stuff which is mostly just cut from a billet.

    They seem to enjoy using cnc machinery to make hundreds of different bits.
    I think we’ve been paying for those machine upgrades since 1990.

    I find it’s things like servicing, the bearings being a prime example. You look at something like the bulb and the main bearing behind the freehub is gigantic, but todays [pro 2/evo/4 the bearings are thin, and id expect from that to be lighter and flimsier.
    Cost of them has rocketed, so you’re looking at 40 quid for new bearings, plus either the drifts to fit them yourself at another 40 quid, or a shop to do it for not far off that. is it any wonder people just buy a new hub when the bearings expire.
    Certainly I’m seeing a lot of dismantled hope wheels, usually sold without the freehub, which mostly being alloy gets ripped up more than ive ever seen a freehub damaged such. Almost like lets create this part so it also as a finite life. Personally the only reason I can see that they dropped the Ti freehub, was because it was so good.

    ginsterdrz
    Free Member

    Shimano have it in the bag. Simple installation and safety built in without the rediculous torque values required on other cranksets. I’m out as soon as ‘wave washers’ and ‘adjusting collars’ are mentioned in any chainset blurb.

    nixie
    Full Member

    Because it’s so easy not to overtighten a Shimano set! Half the damn tools circumvent the idea of the proper tool. Also relying on ‘finger tight’ is never a good plan.

    biggles
    Free Member

    With regards to 70Nm torque being too much, and therefore ignored.

    I think we need to appreciate just how much torque larger threads can take.

    For example grade 4.6 steel M24 bolt (diameter 24mm) can be tightened to 320Nm. We need to account for aluminium threads, but even then we get to 100Nm. Thread pitch, lubricated threads etc will also have impact on torques.

    So I guess if an manufacturer bothers to specify a torque it was done for a good reason..

    Having said all that Shimano cranks are ace!

    teethgrinder
    Full Member

    Shimano cranks never get stuck on. That XT one i had to angle grind off because one of the hex bolts rounded must have been a figment of my imagination

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    hex bolts rounded

    More magically self-rounding bolts! 🙂

    nickjb
    Free Member

    Shimano cranks never get stuck on. That XT one i had to angle grind off because one of the hex bolts rounded must have been a figment of my imagination

    Why on earth would you angle grind it off just because of a rounded bolt head?

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    SRAM cranks – they just require one 8mm Allen key to fit (The same one self-extracts). Lovely and also pretty idiot-proof… Even easier than HT2…

    You forgot the bar extension to get them undone (and the 2mm to do up the preload collar). And I still haven’t worked out why the cap on the self-extracting bolt disappeared mid-ride on mine, meaning I had to buy a new one to get it off.

    teethgrinder
    Full Member

    More magically self-rounding bolts! 🙂

    Nothing magic about it.  Previous owner didn’t look after it properly.  Salt and mud in the threads and probably over-tightened.

    Why on earth would you angle grind it off just because of a rounded bolt head?

    Because it was rounded off and wouldn’t undo  and the bolt heads are set into the crank arm.  And it was the inner one.

    User error leading to damaged parts.  Not just an issue with Hope cranks.

    biggles
    Free Member

    I guess in the heat of the moment good judgment goes out of the window? Rather that wait and think we just get on with it and in the process make it worse.

    Friend of mine (who is a good engineer) tried to use his expensive torque wrench to undo a bolt. Said bolt had already defeated his breaker bar. happens to the best of us!

    FB-ATB
    Full Member

    No mention of the Superstar crank fitting tool (aka a rock)?

    nixie
    Full Member

    I’ve just a torque wrench to undo bolts before. The massively tight crank bolt on a car engine, was the only thing I wcould get in the gap between engine and chassis and at an angle I could actual apply force to it. Still had to use my leg! I did set it to a ery high torque value first though and it didn’t click.

    SirHC
    Full Member

    Me mate just got the new YT Izzo pro race and his sram carbon crank set snapped in the first week of riding it.

    On the flip side, I’ve two sets of X01 carbon cranks that between them are not far away from 2million feet of descending in 6 years. Retired one set as the axle shaft was finally too worn and the other one is heading the same way.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 105 total)

The topic ‘Bloody Hope cranks have snapped…. Grrrr’ is closed to new replies.