The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption

by 51

It seems it’s the season for publishing big fancy books about your brand. Here’s the latest addition to the bike library, from Starling Cycles:

Born in the depths of the NSMB forum, the Starling Fallacy is Starling’s deepest, darkest secret.

It lurked in wait, exposing the core of the brand’s being; its modus operandi; its original sin. But like all secrets, it would never rest, never die, never cease. It would always be there, in the shadows, threatening the heart of Starling Cycles.

And so, Starling Cycles founder Joe McEwan has decided that enough is enough. Like all good internet conspiracies, he knew that the fallacy was based in truth. And so, it’s time to come clean.

The game is up. Starling is no more. Steel and single pivot is not, in fact, real.

“The Starling Fallacy holds that somehow great geometry and shed manufacturing can overcome the performance issues of a true single-pivot bike. And, since we know that great geometry is free and easily duplicated we can further boil down the fallacy to say that shed manufacturing alone can overcome said issues. 

You don’t even have to produce all your bikes in the shed – just some of them. And so, riders who absolutely would not accept the performance of a simple no-linkage true-uni-pivot design from a major manufacturer or even a smaller manufacturer will gush about the descending prowess of a Starling.”

Andrew Major, NSMB

The Starling Fallacy – Available To Order Now

To mark the final chapter of Starling Cycles, McEwan has decided to lift the lid on the brand with a limited edition, 36-page, hardback coffee table quality print journal entitled the ‘Starling Fallacy’. Intended as part memoirs and part confession the book will allow McEwan the opportunity to come clean and for, he hopes, redemption. 

“Being honest” says McEwan in the opening chapter entitled ‘Got Fired? Fire Up The Welder’ “I just needed a job after I got sacked from my Aerospace gig”.

“I’d been mountain biking a couple of times so I thought I’d give it a shot. I wasn’t sure how to make any money from it, but I knew that would come pretty easily”. 

Nailed It. 

Joe admits that he quickly spotted a gap in the market: “there were frame builders all over the place and it looked pretty easy. You just copy some geometry from another brand and make it a bit longer, lower and slacker. Then you stick a few tubes together and Bob’s your uncle.” 

Joe’s enthusiasm wasn’t held back by a lack of resources and, he admits, inspiration was drawn from the world around him. “I only had the shed to work in because the wife wouldn’t let me weld in the house, so I worked in there. I bought a welder from eBay and prayed I wouldn’t blow up the garden. And yeah, I needed a name for the ‘brand’ and was in a rush to get to the pub on a Friday so I just picked the first thing I spotted out of the window, a Starling on the garden fence. Nailed it.”

Joe quickly realised that his new brand had exposed something bigger “They honestly couldn’t get enough of it. It was like people saw the shed, saw how basic the bikes were and were willing to pay double what they would for a proper bike. It was nuts. I jacked the price up after I’d built a couple and the cash just came rolling in.”

My First Million.

Frame design was obviously critical and the chapter of the book entitled ‘Mo Pivots, Mo Problems. One Pivot, Mo Money’ bears all.

“Kinematics? No idea. I basically just looked at a load of old bikes online and copied those. People seemed to love the idea of a bike with loads of brake jack, disposable shock bushings and suspension that didn’t work when you pulled the stoppers. It was like the more basic you made it, the more they wanted to convince themselves it would work.”

“Once I’d made the suspension as absolutely low-tech as I possibly could, I had one final brain wave: ‘What if we make it out of the oldest, heaviest, thinnest, easiest-to-snap material possible?’ Steel was the obvious choice. The internet went bananas for it and I made my first million”.

McEwan, currently based in The Bahamas hopes that by sharing his story riders will see the true value of simple, steel, single-pivot bikes and continue to believe the hype.

Once sales of the limited edition print journal ‘The Starling Fallacy’ are complete, he intends to sell the business to a major bicycle manufacturer.

Order your copy of The Starling Fallacy here.

Author Profile Picture
Hannah Dobson

Managing Editor

I came to Singletrack having decided there must be more to life than meetings. I like all bikes, but especially unusual ones. More than bikes, I like what bikes do. I think that they link people and places; that cycling creates a connection between us and our environment; bikes create communities; deliver freedom; bring joy; and improve fitness. They're environmentally friendly and create friendly environments. I try to write about all these things in the hope that others might discover the joy of bikes too.

More posts from Hannah

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 51 total)
  • The Starling Fallacy: 36 Pages of Redemption
  • barney
    Free Member

    This is… bleak AF 0_o

    mashr
    Full Member

    That’ll look sweet on the coffee table beside my Nicolai book

    Woo
    Full Member

    36 pages for £999.99?
    Well I have a history of spending lots of money on books but this is a bit steep for me. I got a first edition of the poems of John Jarmain (1945) for a tiny fraction of this. Bloodaxe today publish a new book by Neil Astley and the late Brendan Kennelly and I shall buy it.

    gazzab1955
    Full Member

    10/10 for this one @hannah 🙂

    stwhannah
    Full Member

    This is all Starling’s work! Nowt to do with me, I just published the PR.

    jimthesaint
    Full Member

    I really hope they’ve gone whole hog on this AF and actually made the book.

    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    Strange thing is – we all know people would/will buy it 😂

    oxym0r0n
    Full Member

    @jimthesaint The photos I took in the trees are not mockups 😀

    ayjaydoubleyou
    Full Member

    Andrew Major, NSMB, Sept 2021.
    Can never quite tell if NSMB are ahead of the curve; intentionally ironic; or just up their own arses. Often amusing to read though.

    I believe you totally would, and I might too if it weren’t for what I call the Starling Fallacy.

    The Starling Fallacy holds that somehow great geometry and shed manufacturing can overcome the performance issues of a true single pivot bike. And, since we know that great geometry is free and easily duplicated we can further boil down the fallacy to say that shed manufacturing alone can overcome said issues. You don’t even have to produce all your bikes in the shed – just some of them.

    And so, riders who absolutely would not accept the performance of a simple no-linkage true-uni-pivot design from a major manufacturer or even a smaller manufacturer (see riders talking about Orange bikes) will gush about the descending prowess of a Starling.

    Just imagine the shit talk if Cannondale launched a modern version of their Prophet – light, simple… oh, “it sucks when braking, etc etc etc.”

    https://nsmb.com/articles/dreaming-crate-suspension/ go down to the comments

    grahamstockmon
    Free Member

    You have to admire Joe’s consistency on this date – I seem to recall a reverse mullet in previous year

    chakaping
    Free Member

    Loved reading the email this morning, really well executed effort.

    10/10

    Can never quite tell if NSMB are ahead of the curve; intentionally ironic; or just up their own arses.

    It’s the latter IMO. They are the MTB equivalent of student journalists. Waaaay too self-important and desperately needing a competent editor, with barely a hint of humour (Uncle Dave was hilarious, but stopped his columns ages ago IIRC).

    ff29
    Full Member

    🤣😂 classic Joe. As a proud Starling owner. Who gives a monkies about NSMB. Mine pedals up and it goes down mountains just fine.

    gbozo49
    Full Member

    Err the date today anyone?

    chakaping
    Free Member

    There’s always one.

    scuttler
    Full Member

    Considering the ‘one man band’, ‘backlog of orders’ nature of Starling (at least that’s the impression I get though they’ve obviously grown), there’s a ton of effort gone into this for no?? reward (other than of course whatever satisfaction they get).

    Still, whatever makes you happy and it’s clear that this guy forges his own path.

    (From a Halifax single-pivot owner so perennially Starling-curious)

    sargey2003
    Full Member

    @scuttler – have you ever done anything in your own time just for the fun of it?

    Speeder
    Full Member

    Congratulations @phutphutend that’s a hell of a piece of work. Very aware and self depreciating.

    scuttler
    Full Member

    @sargey fair point. Not for a while, my to-do list has been getting bigger for about 20 years. Time for a rethink???

    oxym0r0n
    Full Member

    Considering the ‘one man band’, ‘backlog of orders’ nature of Starling (at least that’s the impression I get though they’ve obviously grown), there’s a ton of effort gone into this for no?? reward (other than of course whatever satisfaction they get).

    There’s a few people in the workshop these days streamlining and speeding up the process. Yes, quite a lot of effort – but it was a lot of fun too!


    @scuttler
    you should let your curiosity get the better of you…

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    “ This is all Starling’s work!”

    It’s not though, is it? They blatantly stole a load of Andrew Major’s words without any attribution until after they were called out. It’s thoroughly shitty behaviour. Do you have an explanation @phutphutend and @oxym0r0n ?

    LAT
    Full Member

    if they were trying to sell the book it would be shitty behaviour, but as this is a joke.

    personally, i think it would have been funnier citing the source, considering the glowing review NSMB gave the murmur.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    I’m not sure why he wants credit for saying a load of less than encouraging stuff about a brand that has now done very well, and are proving folk like him wrong.

    LAT
    Full Member

    did he say he wanted credit? i’d assumed, when i read his words a while ago that it was slightly tongue in cheek, especially as he rides a steel rigid bike.

    LAT
    Full Member

    ahh. i get his point about something that polished costing money, none of which went his way.

    sargey2003
    Full Member

    Wanting attribution or payment for an April fools satirical post?

    That may be the biggest sense of humour failure possible.

    bedmaker
    Full Member

    Wanting attribution or payment for an April fools satirical post?

    That may be the biggest sense of humour failure possible.

    I looked, and wondered the same. I think the latter though. Pretty tragic really, the original writing looks to be a pissy comment on a forum, and now he’s looking for recognition.
    By those standards, there are a choice few big hitters on here who could claim to be among the most prolific authors in recent history. 🙂

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    I really hope whoever came up with ‘skeleton ****ing in a biscuit tin’ demands payment if Orange use it in forthcoming April fools copy.

    swanny853
    Full Member

    I don’t think that’s entirely fair- he writes a lot of detailed reviews for NSMB and puts a lot into, for example, making sure he actually sees how easy things are to service, live with long term etc.

    He has opinions but that makes it more interesting than a bland ‘climbs like an xc bike descends like a dh bike’ piece. It doesn’t feel like it would be right to rip a chunk of a review from a website without attribution so does a simple hat tip to someone who has effectively written some of your advertising material seem that hard to do? Even your average influencer at least claims to be doing it to give you exposure.

    I like starling but I think they probably called it wrong on this one.

    chakaping
    Free Member

    Copyright issues can be waived for the purpose of satire.

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright

    Also, unless that was a dismal attempt at his own “meta” April Fool’s post, he’s only confirmed my assessment of NSMB as humourless, self-important bellends. Anybody else would be delighted to have inspired such a fun and inventive bit of content.

    the original writing looks to be a pissy comment on a forum

    Indeed. It wasn’t even an article. What a fanny.

    swanny853
    Full Member

    Technically correct- the best kind of correct. To be sure, I think the starling book is a cracking thing to have done, I just think this is a bit of a rule one violation not to have asked first/rewritten your own words/ hat tipped after. Neither side comes out of this looking excellent to me but Starling called it wrong, Andrew Major is perhaps just overreacting.

    BruceWee
    Full Member

    People who don’t get paid for writing (or taking photos) always seem to think people are over-reacting when their stuff gets used without credit.

    Max Dubler gives a pretty good explanation of why that’s a pretty shitty attitude to have here:

    https://www.maxdubler.com/bitchy-rant-about-holesom/2017/7/10/a-bitchy-rant-about-skateboard-companies-trying-to-use-photos-for-free

    Whoever is in charge of social media at Starling managed to get some decent exposure from this. And yeah, it was a comment on an article already written rather than in the main article itself:

    https://nsmb.com/articles/dreaming-crate-suspension/

    Still doesn’t sit right with me.

    chakaping
    Free Member

    People who don’t get paid for writing (or taking photos) always seem to think people are over-reacting when their stuff gets used without credit.

    Erm, I worked as a freelance journalist for more than 10 years and would never have dreamed of reacting like this.

    In my experience, it’s a handful of wannabe writers (and especially photographers) who get incredibly pissy over borderline cases, or non-cases like this.

    bedmaker
    Full Member

    Whoever is in charge of social media at Starling managed to get some decent exposure from this.

    On the flipside, I reckon the guys blog has probably had more hits in the past few days than in the past few years…

    BruceWee
    Full Member

    In my experience, it’s a handful of wannabe writers (and especially photographers) who get incredibly pissy over borderline cases, or non-cases like this.

    So real writers just let this kind of thing fly whereas amateurs complain?

    Like it or not, it is plagiarism. Unless you want to argue that it somehow falls outside the scope because it was in a comment on the article rather than the article itself.

    And yeah, it’s not plagiarism from one article to another, it’s plagiarism from writing to advertising.

    Lots of technicalities to avoid the issue. Probably why they did it. They get some good advertising and get to piss off someone who said mean things about their bikes. Win/win for Starling.

    chakaping
    Free Member

    So real writers just let this kind of thing fly whereas amateurs complain?

    Exactly. Well said.

    Though obviously most internet commenters wouldn’t be embarrassing themselves like he is either.

    BruceWee
    Full Member

    Exactly. Well said.

    Are you sure you’re a writer?

    If you google plagiarism most writers do seem to get quite upset about it. Maybe you got it wrong. Amateurs don’t worry whereas pros actually do want something done about it.

    I mean, if my writing was plagerised, first off I would be impressed that anyone managed to find it. Then I’d be proud that at least one person had read it. Then I’d probably say, ‘Hey, you used my stuff! Want to be friends?’

    But then I’m definitely an amateur writer. It’s not how I put food on the table and pay the mortgage.

    But yeah, maybe it’s as simple as, Starling got pissy because someone said mean things about their bikes. Then the writer got pissy because Starling said mean things about him saying mean things about their bikes.

    Maybe everyone involved is just taking things a bit too seriously.

    Speeder
    Full Member

    I think it was fairly obvious that the whole thing was a comment on mean stuff the internet said about their bikes and this was just their way of laughing it off.

    If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out. Certainly don’t moan when someone you’ve criticised comes back at you. Even if they do just repeat the mean words you’ve said.

    I’ll admit I’m biased as I’ve never knowingly read NSMB, never heard to this guy and I ride a Starling but I’d be p!$$ed if I were Joe and I’d read all that **** written about the bikes I made.

    argee
    Full Member

    To be fair, i didn’t know it was an April’s Fool thing until reading through this, i just thought they’d owned up to the reasoning behind releasing a single pivot, full suspension steel frame!

    Speeder
    Full Member

    I’ve now read the “source material” for what it is and am now more sympathetic to the writer. He seems to have invented a concept that he’s released into the wild and keeps dropping in everywhere he can because he’s quite proud of it.

    It’s not necessarily a new ideain that it describes a person forgiving some perceived product shortcomings because of other factors they find more important but it does assume that multi pivot suspension is somehow “better” than single pivot.

    Unfortunately he has named Starling in the creation of his concept so instead of being the custom steel simple single pivot fallacy it’s the Starling Fallacy.

    I don’t have any sympathy over his “loss” – it is after all just one man’s rant/comments on the internet rather than real articles BUT I do find it odd that they’ve been copied the text wholesale along with the title. Does the fact that he’s a semi pro writer and not just a punter with a grudge hold any weight? No idea. I can see both sides though I naturally err on the side of Starling.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 51 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.