If you haven't got the courtesy to reply to someone by name, don't bother.
Chat Forum
[closed]
Who is "the OP"
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
+1 What the OP said ^
Posted 1 year ago # -
Octagonal Pyramid
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oh yes, that reminds me.
When I first got on the internet, I was told never to make "Me too" posts as it just wastes band width.
It seems like people now consider replacing "me too" with "+1" is acceptable.
It is not.Posted 1 year ago # -
+1 MTG.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Posted 1 year ago # -
it just wastes band width.
we're not all on 9600 dialup connections anymore, though...
Posted 1 year ago # -
wot ee sed
Posted 1 year ago # -
I have nothing new to add.
Posted 1 year ago # -
+1 OP.
Posted 1 year ago # -
wwaswas
+1
Posted 1 year ago # -
"Me too" posts just wastes band width.
Posted 1 year ago # -
+1 Phil's cat
"Midlandtrailquestgraham" wastes a lot more bandwidth (bandwidth?) than "OP" ,Midlandtrailquestgraham.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Personally, I love threads like this, but I'm surprised that MidlandTrailquestsGraham couldn't predict that it would 'waste' a whole lot of bandwidth...
Posted 1 year ago # -
Who is "the OP"
Um, you?
Posted 1 year ago # -
I have nothing new to add.
me too +1
Posted 1 year ago # -
Having an unnecessarily long name wastes bandwidth
but obviously +1.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I doubt MidlandTrailquestsGraham is really the OP's name making the point somewhat moot.
Posted 1 year ago # -
If you haven't got the courtesy to reply to someone by name, don't bother.
If you don't have the courtesy to pick a short username that folk can type quickly then don't expect to be called by it.
Besides, OP also refers to Original Post, so it can be used as shorthand to say "Getting back to the question in the original post by MilitantTrailquestionGreg, before we got sidetracked into debating the best type of pie.."
Posted 1 year ago # -
Wow. How to get wound up over nothing in one easy lesson.....
Posted 1 year ago # -
I doubt MidlandTrailquestsGraham is really the OP's name
Is it just me who's slightly disappointed by this revelation?
anyway, back to the OP;
given most people abbretiate my forum name to www not the wwaw it should be I'm happy to be either of those or OP.
and let's face most people on here are glad of any attention they can get
Posted 1 year ago # -
OP = Original Peter, the early version of PP (peterpoddy) that didnt include as many bells and whistles... it did come with a handy flap for putting your wallet under in wet conditions though.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I see OP and my mind says orthopaedic practitioner. I don't even know if thats a real job!
Posted 1 year ago # -
Isn't it annoying when someone breaks the rules of the internet?
Posted 1 year ago # -
-1
I disagree.
What's the score now?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oi. Phil. Outside. Now. Fisticuffs.
LOL actually....
Posted 1 year ago # -
What's the score now?
+3 to the OP?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Posted 1 year ago # -
I found this anagram:
A rad madman squits thrillageWhereas OP only results in PO.
Anyone do better?
Posted 1 year ago # -
+1, me too to the OP.
Best take all these pictures of Pussy down pronto or you lot are for the naughty step....
Posted 1 year ago # -
OP makes a lot of sense though; 100 posts into some argument about some triviality vaguely related to the OP and someone says in response to grahams post, it can be quite unclear who graham said or what his opinion was.
OP is quite clear.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Im the OP & so's my wife.
Posted 1 year ago # -
is this thread trolling or just an Obvious P-take
Posted 1 year ago # -
+1 (stoner) +1 (mogrim) +1 (Zulus) +1 (Ho Hum) +1 (kunstler) (it started getting a bit confusing here
) +3 (?) (Peter Poddy) +1 (boblo) +1 (me) to the OP
Posted 1 year ago # -
double or quits?
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
