...I will stand and cheer.
Need to get from Exeter to Manchester (or Leeds) on Saturday (or Friday). Cheapest ticket from thetrainline website is over £100 + booking fees etc. I can get a free lift with someone tomorrow and I can get two nights in a hotel for less than £100.
**** hate trains.
trains are good. The blood-sucking scum that run them are pirates and robbers. We all believed Thatcher when she told us how much better the trains would be, cheaper, cleaner, on time, when they privatised BR, didn't we?
(OK, BR was hanging too....)
You forget the decades of underinvestment in rail in the UK which have left us in this position with the difficulty of adding additional capacity in an environment where zero incidents are considered mandatory.
Virgintrains seems to be coming up with £67, for travelling up Sat and coming back Sun.
True, we have wasted an opportunity that the great Victorian engineers built by spending on roads instead of rail.
Tell you what though, I'd much rather have this conversation over a pint or two of beer 
You forget the decades of underinvestment in rail in the UK
In it's last year of full operation (1993-4) British Rail received a £2 billion subsidy from the government. And that was because they were pumping money into BR in preparation for privatisation.
In 1989-90 before the final decision to privatise had been made, BR received only £1 billion.
Today the government pours about £5 billion a year into the network.
So the private rail companies now cost the tax payer 5 times more than BR did.
Why would Thatcher have cared anyway? She never had to travel anywhere by train anyway. And she mustuv made a bloody fortune from privatisation, the conniving sneaky thieving bitch.
Please die, Maggie. Please.
There's no point blaming Thatcher for everything RudeBoy. She would have done nothing had she not had, the support of a substantial minority of the British electorate.
A lot of people chose to believe the 'market always knows best' economic gobbledygook which she spouted, so she was able to do what she did. No one was forced to vote Tory, and had they not done so, she wouldn't have done anything.
It's still all her fault. And anyone who voted Tory.
Once in power, she definitely din't act in the interests of the British people, no matter how the brainwashed fools who supported her may argue.
Nasty Thatcher. Now, it costs a fortune to travel by train, while she gets helicopters everywhere, and private health care. And free money.
No wonder her husbind was an alkie...
the big question -
Thatcher's grave: dancer or pisser?
Dance, get pissed, piss on grave.
When I am Presidente, I shall have a discotheque built on her grave. That way, she can finally bring some joy, to peoples' lives.
RB - that's a bit nasty about Dennis.
...but in terms of underinvestment in rail it wasn't only the Tories. Read Christian Wolmar for a good background.
Once in power, she definitely din't act in the interests of the British people, no matter how the brainwashed fools who supported her may argue.
No she didn't act in the interests of the British people. She acted in the interests of the class which she married into - the super rich. And she wasn't much bothered if they were British, American, South African or any other nationality, as long as they were rich capitalists, she would serve their best interests. The British working classes, miners, car workers, steel workers, etc, could kiss her ar5e as far as she was concerned.
And I can't denounce her for that, after all, sticking up for my class and serving it's best interests is exactly what I try and do.
You can't dismiss Thatcher's supporters as 'brainwashed' RudeBoy. The information on which I base my opinions is as much available to them, as it is to me. They are however wrong.
She also despised the very people who voted for her... the middle classes.
Thatcher's grave: dancer or pisser?
Truly not worth the effort to demonstrate such dislike for that woman.
Of course Thatcher didn't have anything to do with rail privatisation, but why let facts get in the way of a good rant?
the very people who voted for her... the middle classes.
The voters who tilted it in her favour where actually the the C2s.
It was the "prosperous Midlands" which swung from Labour to Tory in '79 and gave Thatcher her majority. Her appeal to 'personal greed' struck a particularly strong chord with them - they were doing very nicely thank you, and wanted more, specially those council houses at give way bargain basement prices.
Of course the irony of it all is, that it was the those very people the skilled manual workers in engineering who ended up being truly shafted by Thatcher.
Of course Thatcher didn't have anything to do with rail privatisation
Thatcher had everything to do with rail privatisation. Firstly it was her that brought privatisation onto the agenda - if gas, electricity, etc had not been privatised, then the railways certainly wouldn't have been.
Rail privatisation always presented itself as a particularly difficult problem, and Thatcher made several failed attempts to privatise rail before being sacked by her party and the issue was being resolved by her successor.
......and Neil Kinnock was such a better alternative
support of a substantial minority of the British electoratelike the current labour administration
sticking up for my class and serving it's best interests is exactly what I try and do.which class is that? the left wing intelligensia class? the Derek Hatton class, the Eric Heffer class? the Arthur Scargill class?
economic gobbledygookah... "the end of boom and bust!"
Well 'boom' has ended, in quite a spectacular manner too. Lucky those red rosette wearing gibbons in government have plenty of national debt to throw at the people they really care about though, Thatcher's old pals in finance.
If the rail companies do go bust then the economy will be even more FUBARed: Millions unable to get to work on a daily basis.
East Coast have tried to hand the keys back, and the story is that the DfT (after swearing blind that they wouldn't do it) have put them on a letter agreement. This effectively ensures the trains keep running but on a 'cost plus' basis.
Cue the floodgates opening for all the other struggling* franchise operators to go banging on the door.
*why are they struggling? Because the franchising process has rewarded those who offer the DfT the greatest income stream, whilst due to the short timescales of an 8 year franchise offers no opportunity to work up any kind of long-term investment business case.Now the economic situation is not all 'grow,grow, grow', these operators who forecast major growth (and an economy able to support increasing revenue) cannot make their payments back to the DfT.
Broken system? Sure, but who's going to sort it out?
Bah.
Anybody else think it's a bizarre set up when the operating companies don't own any of the key assests (the tracks, the stations & the trains)? Bonkers, bonkers, bonkers.
Not really Cheeseyfeet. I work for the worlds largest logistics company, who don't own the majority of the aircraft they operate, nor the airfields they operate from, nor the airlanes and flight slots they have to fly in. Ownership of the infrastructure is not essential to operating a good service,it just requires the right motivation for doing so. Unfortunately in order to get companies to take on the burden of operating our creaking, massively under-invested network (hugely under the Tories and significantly under Labour) the penalties for poor performance have to be light or easily avoidable in order not to frighten off operators. Of course the flip side is that nationalised railways have even less motivation to provide a good service as penalties for poor performance only hurt the people imposing them and therefore would be unlikely to be used.
Disagree. Aircraft & airports, etc are a different kettle of fish as aircraft can go anywhere and multiple airlines, etc use routes & airports etc. Trains can only go where the track is. as for the rolling stock. Investment companies own the trains and lease them to operators for a profit. Surely cheaper for the end customer if this profit element is removed?
Anyway, I'd just be grateful if I could actually use the train when I want. Every sodding weekend we have engineering works. If I wanted to travel by somne shitty 60 year old double decker, I'd have gone to a bus museum. Ever tried getting a bike on a bus?
Cheesyfeet "Ever tried getting a bike on a bus? "
Love that short downhill section on the stairs? 
All - ignoring all the political bits (I am too ignorant of such matters to contribute anything useful!) some advice on booking train tickets:
1) Don't use thetrainline.com
2) Use one of the service provider's own sites, most of the them (namely southwesttrains.co.uk Flaperon - which will do you tickets from Exeter) don't charge a booking fee or a fee for using any kind of card (credit/debit/birthday)to pay
Fully agree on how pants Trains have become. Virgin really stuffed the whole lot by bringing in those ghey little XC trains which are too small, and have (even in 1st class) the least comfortable armrests I have ever seen/felt.
Flaperon, I feel your pain - we used to live in Leeds and still visit often (from Exeter), it is a mission of a drive even when the roads are empty and if the trains were any good or even just cheaper - we'd probably use them.
Investment companies own the trains and lease them to operators for a profit. Surely cheaper for the end customer if this profit element is removed?
Except that the operators do not have the millions of pounds needed to pay for new rolling stock, nor, given they are franchised, is it in anyone's interests that they own multi-million pound assets with 30+ year lives.
I think people seriously underestimate how much better, on average, the train service is than only 3 or 4 years ago.
book loads of separate tickets. go from manchester to birmingham, then birmingham to cheltenham, cheltenham to bristol, bristol to exeter.
just on bristol to manchester that saved me £45 last week. (£118 open return down to £73). it's perfectly legit as long as your train stops at those stations. you don't have to get off or anything.
on teh other hand this administration seems to have really got the hang of privatising profits and nationalising debt...
as for the OP - have you looked at flights?
the train back from the beer festival a couple of weeks ago was free. trains are great. bit of a bummer the station is so far from my house, but i suppose it gave me a chance to sober up a bit.
Return ticket Reading to derby, booked a few weeks in advance. £35
If i want to do the same journey but calling in on a friend in Leicster on the way £100!
All because that devition means going through london.
£35 was stomachable as thats what it would cost to fill a car with petrol. But there comes a point where I'm drawing the line. By the time I've taken an afternoon/morning of work for traveling I'm looking at paying £200, car would have been £30 return in petrol, wouldn't smell of piss, vomit, shit, or those horrible virgin microwave bacon and cheese paninis (which must be the worlds most ungodly smell) and wouldn't have a screeming kid next to me.
Part privatisation is the key IMO, look at the NHS, few years back a friend had to wait for a knee arthroscopy, about 6-8months. When it was my turn it took two months, and i had the choice of about three hospitals trying to convince me to go to them.
Either that or let the train compnies opperate any line they like (within reason), and let the cheepest, least piss soaked train win!
I take my bike on the bus every week and have no car. It is the only way for me to get to the woods. I can either put the bike under the bus or they have bike holders at the back of the bus. I do live in Sweden though. All the buses and trains are nationalised but maybe run by private companies. This means the prices and timetables/Discounts and timetables are standardised.
Forget Fatcha. For a lot of people in the UK trains stopped being a viable alternative to cars with the production of the Beeching Report and the subsequent wave of branch line and station closures.
It's still all her fault. And anyone who voted Tory.
I vote Tory. Probably always will. (Apart from loca council elections, the Lib-Dems do a good job round us. I might vote for them if I though they could do a better job as a government though) I've seen what Labour governments do to this country. They screw it up. They spend money they haven't got, then someone else has to come along and try to sort it out, then THEY get the blame for it. History isn't currently repeating itself, it's regurgitating.
Edit - Oh yeah, I'm from Nottinghamshire. We knew the striking miners were on to a looser as well.
I don't think many of you understand quite how complex rail operations are. I've been involved in a project which is looking to run a new half hour service in a fairly busy part of the country, this service won't be coming into operation until 2013 or 2014, but even so the project is having trouble getting the slots.
Two nights in a Manchester Holiday Inn: £54, and that includes free car parking and breakfast. Result.
Actualy, I blame Thatcher, Major, Blair and Brown
Thatcher - for being so shortsighted mole's were extending their sympathy
Major - for finishing off Thatchers work
Blair - for doing fek all but break promises for 10 years
Brown - for continuing Thatchers gradd tradition of helping the rich, in the vain belief that this will trickle down and benifit everyone.
This topic has been closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
