breatheeasy - MemberThis months test IIRC was an On One Whippet, Exotic Carbons frame with some stuff stripped from a Trek, a Cube (all around the grand mark, proper XC hardtails, barends etc. with 100mm travel forks) and a Scott Spark at £2.5k. Think the test was entitled something like "is cheap carbon frame any good". So no, as the expensive carbon bike won...
You must need a run-up to miss the point that badly
They all got decent marks, and the article concludes "Is it worth buying a hudget carbon frame? Yes". But don't let that get in the way...
The scoring includes a value consideration so the Spark didn't just take the win by virtue of being most expensive. The comparison throughout was with metal equivalents, it wasn't a 4-bike head-to-head. The On One and the Exotic both got the "value" prize as well.
And what do you mean "the expensive carbon bike won..."? The Spark's a budget carbon full suss, £2300 for a complete build is not an expensive carbon bike by any means.

