Wheres the rest of the mag?
Mine seems awfully thin this issue and 16 pages light compared to 54.
Bike Forum
[closed]
Singletrack Issue 55 - Recession bites.
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Funnily enough I thought it felt a bit thin too, but haven't compared it to any others so no idea how it really stacks up.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Thats as maybe, but I was pleased to see another holiday / bivvy article, haven't seen one of them for ages
Posted 2 years ago # -
They may have taken out the adverts.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Perhaps if I sign up as a Premier user I get the rest.
Posted 2 years ago # -
im not sure if its me having had a bit of time off the bike so not so inspired or the mag itself, but im normally dead keen to read it but this issue isnt really grabbing my attention. probably me!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I can post you my last 2 copies - just read them over and over.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Yeah, it felt a little light when I picked mine up from where it had hit the floor after postie had rammed it throught the letter box.
But then again, hasn't there been a reduction, or a price freeze on the Sub ?.
Anyway, if the missing pages were going to be interviews, then I'm glad they've been omitted. I don't like the interviews, they are almost always skipped.
S.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Had a flick through this morning in the supermarket, nothing caught my eye, so I didn't buy it.
Posted 2 years ago # -
not seen the mag yet ,
but have to agree about the "interviews" thing ...they really are pretty lame IMO - especially when you compare the content / topics 'discussed' with similar interview based features from the very early issues of the mag.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Haven't got mine yet.
Posted 2 years ago # -
It's pretty poor.
The articles are just weak and the writing seems lazy and without passion. I looked at an old copy from 2007 (Felt Virtue et al test, Dalby Forest trail guide etc) and it was really good quality with loads of content.
I'm glad I don't have a subscription. Thank god the forum is entertaining!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I thought it was up to the usual standard. But if you think its light perhaps you should write your own artical, take some pictures and send it in. It may well get printed.
I offered one but they needed pictures, which I couldnt supply. I may redo it with pics and see if they are interested.
In the spirit of moaning - I was moaning that there were no navigator style events in the summer. So I made up one myself and several mates had a go at it. They loved it and I really enjoyed doing it. So the moral is - DIY.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Hmmmm... A fair point. But I don't see why I should have to write an article, get appropriate photos and send it in to pad out a magazine I then have to shell out for. It would just feel to me like I'm doing their work for them.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm glad I don't have a subscription. Thank god the forum is entertaining!
I don't really get on with the magazine, but I buy it because it pays for the forum. If no one bought the mag...
Posted 2 years ago # -
The recession must have hit the spell checker and the proof reader this issue as well. The Tracy Moseley article was particularly bad. Content seemed OK to me though.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Geez, we're a moany lot. I really liked this month. Two bike camping articles that may have given me a bit of inspiration, rest of it pretty good too. Didn't notice it was thinner, just thought I'd raced through it because I was enjoying the mag.
Agree on the interview stuff though. The "Interview edition" was wall to wall pish.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Just get the £15 on line premier thing, cheap as er Chipps!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I was happy with this months mag
Posted 2 years ago # -
The Tracy Moseley article was particularly bad.
I quite liked that.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Each to their own and all that of course, but whilst a little thinner I thought it was excellent - a really good balance of articles. Thre articles (for me anyway) cover such a range of interesting topics. Particularly liked the Canadian one and also the one about the anatomy of crashing.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Thats as maybe, but I was pleased to see another holiday / bivvy article, haven't seen one of them for ages
That made me lol.
Mag does seem a bit thin, I agree. Not many bike tests either?
Magazine and newspaper sizes are at least partly dictated by the number of adverts sold though. Perhaps it was a quiet month.
Posted 2 years ago # -
It’s must be tough running an bike mag these days, especially when you are now having to compete with the free online PDF ones (I won’t list them of here, it’s not fair) suffice to say you get what you don’t pay for, which is basically Dirt by another name; Piss poor writing, philosophical diatribes on nothing, God awful spelling and grammar, padding the gaps between some pretty pictures (Which you can probably find elsewhere online).
Still the last title ST wants to earn is “Best of a bad bunch”…
Posted 2 years ago # -
Lets be honest the Singletrack is far better than most of the Cycling magazines out there (especially those pumped out by Future Publications (Cycling plus excluded)). Also we cannot complain about the mag as we can write an article and send it in and stand a chance of getting it published, then you can tell your friends and women that you meet that you are a published Author, you can even put it on your CV and look clever.
The one thing I always like(d) about Singletrack over the other mags was the lack of interviews and the fact that there were no pro riders (Ohh look how cool Rob Warner is and how exciting his life is (Joke)). Sadly in the past year there has been a growing number of interviews and pro riders...
Also to echo the comments above without the mag we will all be stuck with BikeMagic or BikeRadar...Posted 2 years ago # -
I thought it was a pretty good edition, 54 was the best for awhile though, especially after the interview edition (happy with one interview per edition, but not loads of em).
I think the mag has carved a bit of a niche in the 'adventure mtb' space, rather than freeriding, or xc or downhilling, so the bivvying and long distance endurance type rides, which appeal to me, fit in well.
Posted 2 years ago # -
After a couple of poor issues at the end of last year (yep, the interview edition did little for me, too) I thought this one was really good. I'd rather a thin mag with good articles than one that is 50% ads that gives me wrist ache (er, you know what I mean
)
Posted 2 years ago # -
The early issues in the year are always the poorest performing in terms of sales so we cut back on 16 pages this issue. We aren't alone. Lots of other mags do the same EVERY year. It has to be in 16 page chunks though due to the way we are printed. It's a big huge printer that prints 16 pages in one pass, so that's how many pages you need to cut.
Just for some perspective.. we've always had an interview in every issue. Last year we did one issue that was somewhat polarising in terms of how it was received. That was the only interview increase.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I've picked it up and put it down 3 times so far, which isn't good. But it might excite me yet.
I did comment when i opened it that "i wish i'd lost that much weight over xmas!"Posted 2 years ago # -
have had my eye on local newsagents for last few days no show......
what supermarket is it for sale in... i'm going cold turkey here
perhaps i should have my postie bring it?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Most Tesco's sell us
Posted 2 years ago # -
i think ST does a good job of portraying 'biking', at least biking/riding that >80% of us partake in.
i can't stand reading MBUK or the other one. they contradict themselves so ofetn in the same article it gets silly.
i also like to mish-mash formula of ST.
i like the fact they don't push particular riding styles and fill their pages with pics of 'freeriders' or 'downhillers' as so many mags seem to do (particularly bad here in germany).
it's funny comparing ST to one of the German offerings. the Germans concern themselves about weight, stiffness and exactly how many mm of travel they got from there forks (156mm out of a stated 160mm for some fox forks!!!!). ST concerns itself with riding and ultimately FUN.
the free online mag is ultimately lots of lads riding big bikes that isn't relevant to most of us. yes the pictures are pretty, but it seems to me they are more interested in the picture content than the textual. a sign of the times, perhaps?i like the adventure articles in ST. i like the fact people ride bikes that aren't the newest offerings from the biggest manufacturers. yeah the grammar can be poor but compared to this forum it's pretty damn good.
i really should get the premier membership thing as i spend the equivalent on a single magazine whenever i see it at the station (12€ a pop).
Posted 2 years ago # -
I like interviews, FWIW.
That one with Nick Larsen was very good.
Industry ones are more interesting than pro rider ones, I think.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Singletrack could be so much better without much effort.
Posted 2 years ago # -
at least you've had a copy...! the postie must still have mine
Posted 2 years ago # -
If they ditched all the opinion pieces that would be a start.
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
