First Ride on a 29er « Singletrack Forum

Bike Forum

First Ride on a 29er

64 posts & 32 voices | Started 12 months ago by forzafkawi | Latest reply from handyman

Tags:

No tags yet.

Pages: 12 Next »

forzafkawi - Member

Got my first ride on a 29er yesterday when I demo’ed a Santa Cruz Tallboy at Peaslake. Being 6’ 4” tall I‘d read that 29ers are especially suited to the taller rider and have been wanting to try one for quite some time. I’ve got to say that I was completely underwhelmed by the experience and my Orange 5 blows the Tallboy out of the water in almost every respect. I especially didn’t like the gyro effect of the huge front wheel making steering a very laboured affair, especially on tight singletrack.

At least I don’t have to worry about whether or not I would be suited to converting to 29ers anymore. I guess I fall into the “not for me” camp but I’m willing to concede that a lot of people do like them and they may be better for the type of riding they do.

I would just like to give a big thank you to Howard at Pedal & Spoke in Peaslake who arranged the demo via Santa Cruz. A great guy and very helpful.

Posted 12 months ago #
timbur - Member

It's good that we're all different.

I've just re-built my 29er after a love hate relationship with it and am liking it again in a different build guise. It's fully rigid with only 9 gears now and works for the riding I do.

Saying that Trek 69er SS's are the best bikes ever.

Tim

Posted 12 months ago #
kiwijohn - Member

I tried a Scott Scale on saturday. Ditto underwhelmed & didn't like the steering feel.
Trying a Tallboy during the week to see if that is any better.

Posted 12 months ago #
YoKaiser - Member

FWIW I reckon you need to learn to ride a 29er what it can do and can't. How long was the test?

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

YoKaiser,

I had the bike all day but gave it back after a couple of hours or so because I'd had enough of it. In that time I rode Barry Knows Best, Yoghurt Pots and Reservoir Dogs twice and Telegraph Row all the way once plus obviously all the assorted climbs and tracks in between. I felt like I had given it every chance and was getting more attuned with the bike by the end but still hated the general feel of it.

I can't really see how "learning to ride the bike" (whatever that means) would have really made any difference to my sense of enjoyment. I rode all of the trails probably about as fast as on my Orange 5 but in my opinion it made the Orange feel lithe and exciting by comparison. None of the supposed advantages of a 29er made themselves apparent to me but all of the disadvantages did, big time.

Posted 12 months ago #
Rorschach - Member

Well as all 29ers handle exactly the same that'll save you trying anymore and you can now right off the whole concept.

Posted 12 months ago #
69er - Member

timbur - Member
It's good that we're all different.

I've just re-built my 29er after a love hate relationship with it and am liking it again in a different build guise. It's fully rigid with only 9 gears now and works for the riding I do.

Saying that Trek 69er SS's are the best bikes ever.

Tim

Spot on! One of each for me, ss and geared. Awesome bikes.

Posted 12 months ago #
chainslapp - Member

Ive never been to Peaslake , so took a look on Youtube at some of the videos of the trails you referred to in your OP. The first question I have, is do you ride anywhere else other than there, as the bike you tested would be, IMO, completely over biked for the terrain? I know some people have one bike for all and the cost of a Tall Boy would suggest that this could be the case here. To me, you would have more fun and a greater sense of achievement doing those trails on a hard tail 29er instead. Just out of curiosity, could you enlighten me as to why you have chosen the Tall Boy as potential for your next bike?

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

chainslapp,

I live in Essex so mainly ride Epping, Hainault, Thorndon etc. on a SS fully-rigid or Inbred with 100mm suss up front. We visit places like the Surrey Hills maybe once a month on average and the Dark Peak and Wales when we can arrange (maybe 3 or 4 times a year in total).

At 6’4” the big problem I have with getting demo rides is finding somewhere that has a bike in my size. Mostly they carry size Large or smaller which I have ridden at a pinch but is not ideal. I spoke to a Santa Cruz rep at a demo day a few weeks ago where they had about 20 bikes available across the range but again unfortunately no size XL. He did say SC bikes do come up a bit smaller so riding a Large would not be a fair test but that he could arrange to ship a size XL to the shop in Peaslake.

I spoke to Howard in Pedal & Spoke, the bike shop in Peaslake which is an SC dealer and after calling SC he did manage to arrange the Tallboy in size XL for me for yesterday’s demo. So you can see to a certain extent it was Hobson’s choice but having said that I have always liked the SC range of bikes so would have been seriously looking to upgrade to one in the future if I had been suitably impressed by it.

You’re probably right about the hardtail 29er and I know not all bikes ride the same so maybe I am generalising a bit but I don’t think that I will be looking to get any sort of 29er anytime soon based on yesterday’s experience. I would also encourage anyone thinking of going 29er to at least ride one first and especially the bike they are thinking of buying. That obviously goes for any bike really but it’s surprising how many people don’t demo a bike before committing serious cash.

If I can arrange to get a decent demo on a 29er hardtail in my size at some time in the future then I will be prepared to give it another go.

Posted 12 months ago #
chainslapp - Member

forzafkawi, you have probably heard people harping on about how 29ers roll better over the terrain and that a 100mm front fork seems longer. IMO, it is all true and I find that at 6 foot tall some of the negatives, like slower steering and wheel to toe interface issues, are small compared to the positives. But as someone has already said we are all different and they are all bikes after all.

I noticed from your response that you seem to be riding HT at the moment, have you a FS bike as well?

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

chainslapp,

As I said in my OP I have an Orange 5 as well. With everything I had read about 29ers I was looking for all the positives that have often been mentioned such as lower rolling resistance and carrying speed/momentum. I can honestly say I just couldn't detect them, all I really noticed was the ponderous steering, the slow acceleration and the harsh ride in general. I was very careful to make sure that the suspension was setup correctly for me by the way.

I so wanted to like this bike but just didn't I'm afraid in any way apart from the obvious quality of build that you would expect from SC and paying £4400. It would be interesting to hear from other riders who have ridden the Tallboy because SC had a demo day at Peaslake a few weeks ago and I saw a few of them being ridden around then.

Posted 12 months ago #
TooTall - Member

the harsh ride in general

I believe you would be the first person in the world to find a FS 29er to give you a harsh ride.

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

I believe you would be the first person in the world to find a FS 29er to give you a harsh ride.

I guess it depends on your frame of reference. If you came from a 100mm forked, 26" hardtail then the Tallboy would seem quite plush. All I can say is compared to my 140mm travel Orange 5 that it felt harsh (on descents that is of course).

Posted 12 months ago #
martinh - Member

I've tried the Tallboy but didn't like it either. For me it was less a fun bike and more an XC racer, certainly different than The more you ride 29ers the less steering and more body you use. For most people a day just isnt enough to make this change.

If you want to try a 29er hardtail and are down Swiney way let me know. I'm 6' 4" too so have a couple of the right size.

Posted 12 months ago #
thegreatape - Member

I know what a 69er is, but why are they good?

Posted 12 months ago #
rOcKeTdOg - Member

29ers aren't for eveyone, 2 hours isn't really a fair test against a bike you ride all the time though

Posted 12 months ago #
timbur - Member

tga - It's difficult to say. I resisted riding one for ages saying they looked wrong and were freak bikes but when I finally was forced to try one I fell for it with 5-6 miles. It's just ace as a SS. Quick, nimble and lots of fun.

Posted 12 months ago #
thegreatape - Member

lots of fun

Well that's the main thing I suppose!

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

29ers aren't for everyone, 2 hours isn't really a fair test against a bike you ride all the time though

I realise that, however I did try to give it a fair crack of the whip and tried to keep an open mind about its handling characteristics. But what is the alternative; buy one and hope it grows on you because everyone else says its great?

As I said in previous posts, its negatives were just too apparent for me even over a couple of hours. I don't see how I would ever get over that and I can't believe that the Tallboy's charm would eventually 'out' and win me over. I'm sure there are those that have one and ride the shocks off it and enjoy it immensely, it just doesn't suit me and my riding style and never will as far as I can see.

Posted 12 months ago #
rOcKeTdOg - Member

All 29ers aren't the same though, the TB is a race bike more than a trail bike and you'd probably feel the same riding a 26" xc fs race bike and then riding your 5. have a go on a UK designed frame before you give up

But as I said 29ers aren't for everyone

Posted 12 months ago #
charlie the bikemonger - Member

Feedback from customers who have taken out our demo 29ers has always been positive.
Somethig is odd here?
It sounds like you had the wrong bike: whether that be too much travel for the trail, to much stem, wrong size or whatever... Because the steering should not be "very laboured" if the bar and stem is right.
Not being able to detect the "supposed advantages" also is odd. You should have thundered along and noticed extra grip.

Not dismissing your experience, it's just very different to all the 29er feedback and also personal experience I have had.

Maybe the advantages are more obvious on a Hardtail where the suspension doesn't dilute or discuise what's going on?

Posted 12 months ago #
takisawa2 - Member

What rocketdog said.

But to add, I grew to love re-connecting with the steel ht, after years of overbiked fs bikes. And that tied in with me growing tired of trail centre type trails & looning down hills. When the 29er came along it was like I'd rediscovered all of what I loved about mtb again. But, total respect for being honest about the SC, & good on them for organising a demo.
It is perhaps an unfair expectation though, comparing it to a bike like the 5; that's always going to have the edge if your pushing hard over technical stuff.

And I love the slower steering on my 29er.
Must be my age.

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

All 29ers aren't the same though, the TB is a race bike more than a trail bike and you'd probably feel the same riding a 26" xc fs race bike and then riding your 5. have a go on a UK designed frame before you give up

Good point rOcKeTdOg and something in all the 29er PR that I had overlooked. I really wanted to have a go on an On-One hardtail and will probably wait for the new Scandal 29er with the swap dropouts to come out later this year. I wouldn't be using it for Peaslake though, more for fast training blasts around my local trails.

I haven't given up on 29ers completely.

Posted 12 months ago #
Coasting - Member

Well im with you on the 29er thing.I dont think the full suspension 29er amounts to much more than a big tractor dulldozing its way thru everyting.Gr8 if your a crap rider but nowhere near as much fun of versatile as the 26 equivalent.As for the Tallboy it was probably a good bike to try as it seems to be one of the better trail bikes around.Ive tried one and found it a bit uninspiring.I think where the 29er thing comes into its own is on the hardtails.There certainly seems to be some advantage to be had.I have a Swift for race duties and it works well.But like bellybuttons we all have an opinion

Posted 12 months ago #
chainslapp - Member

But like bellybuttons we all have an opinion

Coasting - You are quite right, everyone has an opinion and those opinions have been considered in a lot of the posts above and to repeat, 29ers aren't for everyone. No one is forcing the OP to like them.

Posted 12 months ago #
thegreatape - Member

Not wanting to hijack in any way, but since the right people are on this thread, can anyone very briefly compare/contrast the Swift and Karate Monkey?

Posted 12 months ago #
keavo - Member

well done for trying it out. better than the usual 29ers are crap statements made by people who have no time riding one.

Posted 12 months ago #
chainslapp - Member

thegreatape - firestarter has had both and would probably be one of many you could talk to on here.

Posted 12 months ago #
charlie the bikemonger - Member

I have enjoyed both swifts and monkeys.
My favourite by a twisty dusty mile is the Niner Sir9. Clearly illustrates that not all bikes are equal. (or indeed equally priced.

Posted 12 months ago #
bullheart - Member

Interesting thread.

I've got a rigid HT 29er and a Prince Albert with 140mm up front. I've got to the point where I'm not that keen on taking the PA out, especially to Holmbury, Peaslake and the Surrey Hills (my usual riding places) where in theory the bike excels; I find myself taking the 29er because the riding is more 'fun'. I agree with some of the statements above - I don't think a few hours on a Tallboy on BKB, Telegraphs, etc, is truly representational of what a 29er can or cannot do. In fact, I would think that demo-ing said bike there would probably give most people a negative view of it, truth be told. I think a HT 29er might be far more fun on trails like that.

However, if the OP tried the bike and didn't like it for the type of riding he'll mostly be undertaking, then no amount of persuasion will work. Me? I wouldn't ride an FS bike for similar reasons, but that's just personal preference.

Good luck though. I'm in the process of selling of all but one of my bikes and just running a Vassago Jabberwocky as my main ride. SS, rigid (unless anyone has some Rebas 29er for sale...!) and good fun.!

Posted 12 months ago #
rOcKeTdOg - Member

I have enjoyed both swifts and monkeys

Phrase of the day!

Posted 12 months ago #
chainslapp - Member

I have enjoyed both swifts and monkeys.

The RSPCA have been informed.

Posted 12 months ago #
forzafkawi - Member

Some interesting and well reasoned opinions on this thread I think. I think that I gave the Tallboy fair test but accept that it is not the best tool for the Surrey Hills area.

I would definitely like to try a hardtail sometime and will probably be contacting Charlie to see if I can arrange a demo on the Niner SIR9 because that looks more like the type of bike I would be interested in.

Posted 12 months ago #
big_n_daft - Member

I wonder why the OP was trying the Tallboy? he has a hardtail and a Five already, what were you expecting the difference to be?

Not liking 29er's isn't an issue, it's the idiots that state they are pants without trying a few that are the problem (which the OP isn't)

Personally I am growing to like 69er FS, a conversion of an old Jekyll has breathed new life into an old frame.

Posted 12 months ago #
thegreatape - Member

So, similarly to big n daft, is there any reason not to stick a rigid 29er fork and wheel on the front of my old Kona to give it a try? Or will that bugger up the geometry too much, as it is quite an old one and only has a short travel fork on it just now.

Posted 12 months ago #