One of them was wondering how much damage it would do to the UK’s European research collaboration
It wont destroy us overnight, the loss of the EMA is a big blow for pharma & drug development, and translational medicine. We will still be paying in to quite a few schemes (according to white paper) but loose input & voting rights on world’s biggest collaborative science grant awarding, our research is good enough that we should still win the majority of funding (assuming politics isn’t a factor) . Physics is more dependent on EU money than most, so will suffer more, ironically the EU is a major funder of (non-commercial) UK archaeology, so there is real worry that, based on the govs track record, our heritage is set to lose out.
Biggest damage will probably be through loss of FOM, which has been brilliant for research and studying as well as the general anti-immigrant & anti-EU hostility that is our new normal.
I am more amazed that so many people are STILL in denial
May will move the agenda forward slowly. The soft concessions are all happening on both sides. Progress, albeit it glacial. If we could cut out the BS things might progress more effectively – but that’s a long shot especially with our media
teamhurtmore – Member
I am more amazed that so many people are STILL in denial
May will move the agenda forward slowly. The soft concessions are all happening on both sides. Progress, albeit it glacial. If we could cut out the BS things might progress more effectively – but that’s a long shot especially with our media
I don’t see denial, THM, I see folk accepting it’s going to happen but it will be worse in the future than the past.
Even with a good negotiation and a good deal that’s probably still true.
How much worse? Well it’s hard to say. Will the world end? No. Does it increase the probability of lost growth or even recession? Yes. Does it harm one of the foundations of the longest period of peace in Western European history? Yes to some extent – but do we need that foundation anymore or are we so tied together economically that the job is done? Hmmm – we’ll see.
It’s happening. It probably shouldn’t be, but lemmings love cliffs. The downside may be minimal (though it may not be). There is no appreciable upside.
By the way is your name Neville? There is a reason for asking.
Our own personal low-rent Steve Bannon. You take one look at his unhinged ramblings and you wonder how on earth he ended up being listened to by people in Govenment.
Until people lose their jobs and see personally things turn bad brexit will be ignored.
How many people actually care, a third if that, most people are more concerned by paying the bills and x-factor. You have a small number of people who think brexit is good and a small number who think it is bad.
There is a reason why referendums should never happen and it is simply because most people don’t care enough to find out the facts. Hence why £350M matters, it sounds alot but is not, regardless of whether it is true or not.
Would it have been harder or easier for Scotland to leave the UK than the UK to leave the EU? In terms of actually unpicking the various arrangements, rather than economic future?
Well one big difference is there is no cliff-edge. It would have been (theoretically) possible to build up the scottish capabilities over time, separating from the rest of the UK in a gradual process (which arguably has already been underway for many years).
Whereas saying “We’ll be fully separate in 2 years and duplicate all of the functions that we currently borrow from the EU” is basically asking the impossible. Especially now it’s 18 months and none of this work has even started.
If we do crash out without a deal, what will happen at the ports?
Is there going to be a horrendous backlog because they haven’t planned for this?
Does the UK even make enough food for instance?
If we do crash out without a deal, what will happen at the ports?
The head of the Dover Port Authority was on Channel 4 news the other week. His estimate was that even any minor changes to the existing customs union would see twenty-mile tailbacks of artics at every port
But what does he know? He’s probably some ‘Enemy of the People’
If we do crash out without a deal, what will happen at the ports?
Is there going to be a horrendous backlog because they haven’t planned for this?
as the government arent issuing compulsory purchase orders for new lorry parks around dover, we can assume that No Deal was never actually considered
just lies to feed the RW press
obvs not just borders that suffer, plenty of jobs at risk in the UK
which means we have to accept an off the shelf deal, as unlike THM I dont think we have time, also the EU offered some concessions for Cameron, why would they offer something better for May, especially as her gov has at times threatened to become a tax haven, withold security info and her own cabinet spent the last year squabbling over what it is they want.
The EU position requires agreement between 27 countries, so to try and get a bespoke transition will probably take months to negotiate, then many more months to negotiate a final deal, the UK in contrast has decided that the only way forward is to block the devolved assemblies and parliament and leave if to the executive to make decisions. So remind me who is approaching this from a democratic perspective?
I am more amazed that so many people are STILL in denial
It’s not denial it’s just an unwillingness to accept it’s a good idea – irrespective of the number of people who voted for it. I think they are wrong and I believe I am within my rights to say so.
You’ll be telling us next no-one should vote for political parties who stand no chance of power ‘cos the majority want someone else.
THM, I think it is reasonable to say that there are very few to no upsides to Brexit and getting behind it, accepting it etc. doesn’t actually change that fact.
So why not argue against it? Democracy is democracy, if you see something as a stupid idea do you accept “the will of the people” or do you make your voice heard and argue that it is a stupid idea?
If we go back to my earlier point, how much of the electorate bothered to investigate the question and consider the realities beyond soundbites.
Quite indeed. If it went off it would more likely push us away from Brexit. I’m not sure what to wish for.
Of course there is also a ticking bomb in the form of Italian sovereign debt – and should that one go off it would likely push us towards Brexit (in the court of public opinion).
Either of these could go before April 2019. Christ knows what might happen yet.