Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Does this sentence make sense?
  • daveagiles
    Free Member

    Really can’t work out if I have contradicted myself here:

    The decrease in ambient temperature is inversely proportional to the increase in elevation.

    i.e with an increase in elevation there is a decrease in temperature.

    Perhaps one of the resident pedants could help.

    Cheers!

    crikey
    Free Member

    Why not just simplfy it as you have done above?

    It gets colder the higher you go.

    thepurist
    Full Member

    Yes it does, but I was expecting more buffalo 😉

    daveagiles
    Free Member

    I could, but it doesn’t completely describe the relationship, the ‘proportional’ part.

    I think it should be:

    The decrease in ambient temperature is proportional to the increase in elevation.

    daveagiles
    Free Member

    Now if I could get Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo somewhere I would be onto something….

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    There is an inversely proportional relationship between ambient temperature levels and altitude. ?

    inigomontoya
    Free Member

    Second one.

    coolhandluke
    Free Member

    The decrease in ambient temperature is proportional to the increase in elevation and subsequent decrease in atmospheric pressure.

    nicko74
    Full Member

    Agreed – inverse and increase is surely overdoing it – one or tother?

    almightydutch
    Free Member

    Yes makes perfect sense. But i’m not pedant

    daveagiles
    Free Member

    My head hurts.

    Speedy edit almightydutch.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    The decrease in ambient temperature is inversely proportional to the increase in elevation.

    Hmm, that actually says something other than what you want. What you mean is this:

    Ambient temperature is inversely proportional to elevation.

    Your sentence means that when you change some other unspecified variable, the amount by which the elevation changes is inversely proportional to the amount by which the temperature changes. You’re accidentally discussing the differential of both things 🙂 If both things were linear with respect to the other unspecified quantity then your sentence would be baffling but still technically correct.

    Use what I wrote in bold and you’ll be fine.

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    Ambient temperature is inversely proportional related to elevation

    Wot molgrips said

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Well it’s proportional if 100m results in 1C change and another 100m results in another 1C. It’s not, in reality, but it’s a reasonable model in very rough terms for mountaineers etc to use. So that might be ok for the OP to say.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    The English is horrible and the statement is wrong.

    headfirst
    Free Member

    Or,if you want to be long-winded, use the word ‘change’ rather than increase and decrease in your original sentence ( and ignore those who dispute the facts of the matter 😉 )

    Spin
    Free Member

    Try this one on for size:

    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

    daveagiles
    Free Member

    Cheers everyone, yep I am aware that it is a simple flawed model, as are most.

    Think Molgrips hit it on the head.

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

The topic ‘Does this sentence make sense?’ is closed to new replies.