2.2 or 2.4 for general trail riding? I see the 2.2's really turn out to be 1.95's so what are the 2.4's like?
Bike Forum
[closed]
Continental Mountain King Sizing
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
The 2.4 folders seem pretty big to me, certainly seem bigger than +.2 over the 2.2's
Posted 2 years ago # -
I run 2.2 UST mountain kings and have been Lakes, Peak District And Coed-y Brenin with them and they have been fantastic at all times.....A bit sticky in the mud though but great for rocky terrain.....
Posted 2 years ago # -
2.4 front 2.2 rear
Posted 2 years ago # -
2.4 both. They're bigger than some Bontrager ACX 2.3's and the same as WTB Moto Raptor 2.4's.
I can get my tape measure out but they volume will vary depending on your rims!
Posted 2 years ago # -
I think they're a little small for their nominal size - quite tall and round too. I haven't fallen out with mine, but I won't be getting another set either…
Posted 2 years ago # -
Anyone know how they would compare to some Ardents? As I already have the MK Protection 2.2's
Posted 2 years ago # -
The 2.4" seems to be on a par with the Ardent 2.25" (at least, on my rims).
Like cozmobozo, I run 2.4" F / 2.2" R, a very good combo on fairly rocky stuff (trail centres / Exmoor / Qs).
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
