Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Continental Mountain King Sizing
  • shooterman
    Full Member

    2.2 or 2.4 for general trail riding? I see the 2.2's really turn out to be 1.95's so what are the 2.4's like?

    stills8tannorm
    Free Member

    The 2.4 folders seem pretty big to me, certainly seem bigger than +.2 over the 2.2's

    Mikey65
    Free Member

    I run 2.2 UST mountain kings and have been Lakes, Peak District And Coed-y Brenin with them and they have been fantastic at all times…..A bit sticky in the mud though but great for rocky terrain…..

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middling Edition

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middlin...
    Latest Singletrack Videos
    cozmobozo
    Free Member

    2.4 front 2.2 rear 🙂

    Kahurangi
    Full Member

    2.4 both. They're bigger than some Bontrager ACX 2.3's and the same as WTB Moto Raptor 2.4's.

    I can get my tape measure out but they volume will vary depending on your rims!

    glenp
    Free Member

    I think they're a little small for their nominal size – quite tall and round too. I haven't fallen out with mine, but I won't be getting another set either…

    foxyrider
    Free Member

    Anyone know how they would compare to some Ardents? As I already have the MK Protection 2.2's 🙂

    drain
    Full Member

    The 2.4" seems to be on a par with the Ardent 2.25" (at least, on my rims).

    Like cozmobozo, I run 2.4" F / 2.2" R, a very good combo on fairly rocky stuff (trail centres / Exmoor / Qs).

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

The topic ‘Continental Mountain King Sizing’ is closed to new replies.