So we agree that a precedence has been set that facebook can be used to create civil unrest and violent crime?
So ‘we’ are putting words into the mouths of forum members, are ‘we’?
Is this the Royal ‘We’, by any chance, or is this your other personality coming to the fore?
don't agree that any kind of precedent has been set because there is nothing anywhere to suggest Fb has been used in that way, mainly because it requires real names, (although those can be alias, that is against Fb T&C), and it's far too open to scrutiny, there is no anonymity on Fb, which even a complete idiot ought to realise.
What you should
be looking at, if you actually had a clue, is the use of RIM's BBS on Blackberry phones, and Twitter.
Blackberries were used extensively in London because
of the security and anonymity they offer, and you really ought to be more aware of the use of Twitter in the middle east during the various uprisings.
You seem to have an unhealthy fixation with Fb, which is blinding you to other media which is being used extensively.
I could give you Twitter addresses from people in Libya, Syria, Egypt, etc. who are involved in and reporting on the issues out there, but, frankly, I can't be arsed; if you want the info, it's out there to find in the same way I found it, and I'm not doing your research for you.