Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • Can one name sum up a decade?
  • Pook
    Full Member

    Interesting article here
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8399767.stm

    got me thinking. Who would it be for the 2000s and why?

    AndyP
    Free Member

    John Major
    edit: 'and why'? – dull, grey, fairly un-memorable.

    warton
    Free Member

    George Bush

    warton
    Free Member

    or in cycling terms:
    Lance armstrong

    algarvebairn
    Free Member

    Bin Laden?

    higgo
    Free Member

    Jade Goody.
    RIP

    chakaping
    Free Member

    George Bush

    +1 for Dubya

    samuri
    Free Member

    Definately Bush. I think there's a lot of lessons to be learned from this experiment of electing a monkey into the most powerful seat in the world.

    edit: Just read the article, Madeleine McCann and Jade Goody? Come on! How on earth do these names sum up a decade?

    sofatester
    Free Member

    George Bush

    For all the wrong reasons – "mission accomplished" 👿

    Madeleine McCann and Jade Goody

    WTF? 🙄

    mudshark
    Free Member

    Well I think it's actually 20 people – Bush and Bliar have to be there.

    Aristotle
    Free Member

    George Dubya Bush here too

    Jade Goody -the name and all its tragic association stands for vacuous 'celebrity', so there is some justification.

    Bush was fairly vacuous too, come to think of it. He's completely disappeared from the world stage, which is a good thing, but also says a lot.

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    Bush, and not in a good way.

    votchy
    Free Member

    Blair – if only for all the good he did with trying to recreate family values and a nurturing culture, the sure start system and children's centres, the things that are now just starting to bear fruit ready to be axed by the incoming tory government 🙁 (Don't agree with ALL that he did though)

    vinnyeh
    Full Member

    Murdoch's got to be in the mix as well, possibly as the most influential of the non-poliitcians.

    On a similar note, listening to 1989:day by day on Radio 4 has been a real eye opener, a monumental year in 20th century history.

    Aristotle
    Free Member

    the sure start system

    Yes, it is good and has been appreciated, mostly by the respectable people with some spare cash that would bring up their children properly anyway.

    Don't get me wrong, I think it's great, but not quite up there with Sept-11-2001 and the aftermath as the event/zeitgeist of the decade.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Tiger Woods.

    Dull and in retrospect a bit of a turd.

    bigbloke
    Free Member

    Thatcher…

    amodicumofgnar
    Full Member

    10 years.

    Arent the rest of them eras?

    radoggair
    Free Member

    ricky gervais

    mogrim
    Full Member

    Ah, cripes, does this mean tv all over new year will be dominated by pointless tedious debates about the meaning of the decade just ending?

    JacksonPollock
    Free Member

    Yeah, Thatcher! And Gordon Gecko…"Greed is good".

    Good job we have committed characters like this to the annals of history, else we could have had a near collapse of the political/economic systems that underpin our great nation!

    grahamh
    Free Member

    The Dacade dosen't finish till 2010..

    headfirst
    Free Member

    graham, there's no point being a pedant if you can't spell

    bassspine
    Free Member

    .

Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)

The topic ‘Can one name sum up a decade?’ is closed to new replies.