Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 71 total)
  • Android apps? (vs iPhone…)
  • loddrik
    Free Member

    Anyone have any experience of android apps and how they compare to iPhone apps (quantity, price & quality)?

    allthepies
    Free Member

    You need an app for that.

    maxray
    Free Member

    Um nto really sure what the point of the question is 🙂 Is this so you can decide whether to get an Android or Iphone? Preyy sure there are good and bad apps of varying value and quality for both platforms 😀

    loddrik
    Free Member

    To be fair the point of the question is irrelevant. Just wondered if people have experience of apps on both platforms and how they compare in general…?

    Jamie
    Free Member

    Just wondered if people have experience of apps on both platforms

    If reading this forum has taught me anything its your either android or apple.

    Now pick a side!

    muggomagic
    Full Member

    The apple apps are of a better quality, as in they look and feel better, but I think this is mainly due to the apps for android currently being stored on the phones internal memory only, which restricts the developers to keeping the size of the file as low as possible. The android apps are in the main very good in terms of the info or service they provide, and once the 2.2 (froyo) updates start rolling out (this update will mean the apps can be saved to external memory) the developers will be able to make the apps as big as they like.

    simon_g
    Full Member

    Lots of iphone ports, but less polished.

    Lots of typically open-source stuff, crap UIs, half the features "to be finished later".

    Lots of spyware as there's no approval process to get things in the store.

    Moses
    Full Member

    I've fiddled with an iphone and own a Desire. There's not much difference, really. The variability of app quality within a platform is greater than the difference between apple & android

    Surf-Mat
    Free Member

    i-phone – loads of apps, many good but not many free
    Android – loads (but less) of apps, some good, loads free

    spacemonkey
    Full Member

    The iPhone has far more apps provided by the recognised software and service providers. E.g if you browse a few websites, it's likely you'll find far more offering "Download your iPhone app here" and far fewer offering the same for Android.

    If it's true that many iPhone app developers are switching to Android becuase of politics, then this may well swing the other way in the next 12-24 months.

    As has been said already, iPhone apps tend to be "better" and more polished.

    Andituk
    Free Member

    The app store is definetly one place apple has the advantage. There's more apps simply because there are more users. It's much easier to get an app out on the android market though, so hopefully once developers realise the potential, it'll take off quickly.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    i-phone – loads of apps, many good but not many free
    Android – loads (but less) of apps, some good, loads free

    To quantify that, according to appolicious.com around 57% of Android Apps are free and around 28% of iPhone apps.

    Though obviously the total number of apps at each means the App Store has a lot more free apps.

    See also the figures at:
    http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2010/02/25/report-app-stores-compared-store-growth/
    which reports on a study comparing the various app stores.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    "Lots of spyware"

    Cobblers. Name one.

    I've got an Android device and my OH has an iPhone, so I'm actually in a position to compare like for like. I am biased of course, because I prefer the Android's openness to Apple's control, but I'll try and give a fair comparison here.

    Typically, "there's an app for that" tends to be true for the iPhone. On Android there tends to be a choice from a number of 'apps for that,' but this can be a double-edged sword as it often means that some of the choices are crap.

    I've found that free apps are a lot more common on the Android; I've bought two apps total for my phone, OH has bought loads.

    In terms of quality, which was the OP's question, I find that it varies. Apple apps tend to be well polished, because the ones that aren't never get released. Android apps can be better than their Apple counterparts, or can be worse, depending on the priorities of the developer. The open nature of Android means that you generally see both ends of the scale, but the inbuilt voting / review mechanism in the Market means that it's usually fairly straight-forward to sort the good from the bad.

    In all honesty, if you're trying to choose between platforms, I don't think that quality of apps is a huge deciding factor. I'd say it's more pressing to choose between "it just works" and "I've got a lot more freedom but might have to fiddle about a bit".

    speaker2animals
    Full Member

    Do Android phones run Flash Player?

    I can see the argument against the restrictive nature of Apple's Apps policy but surely it does give some sense of security that an open platform will always struggle to give?

    I don't own either so have no axe to grind just asking an open couple questions.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Typically, "there's an app for that" tends to be true for the iPhone. On Android there tends to be a choice from a number of 'apps for that,'

    Eh?? How is that remotely possible when the App Store has seven times as many apps available?
    (150,000 vs 19,897 from that article I linked, though no doubt the numbers have changed since then)

    I've found that free apps are a lot more
    common on the Android; I've bought two apps
    total for my phone, OH has bought loads.

    Yep, from that article free apps are twice as common on Android, but App Store has far far more free apps.

    Also remember a pretty large portion of the "paid" apps on App Store are only 59p.

    I'd say it's more pressing to choose between "it just works" and "I've got a lot more freedom but might have to fiddle about a bit".

    +1 definitely.

    If you want an open-platform that anyone can write and release apps on, without requiring approval by some shadowy body, then Android is your man.

    Conversely if you just want things to work properly and you don't like messing about with stuff then I'd swing towards iPhone.

    Solo
    Free Member

    Hhmm.

    GF signed up for a deal and received the HTC wildfire, last weekend.

    I've a Diamond touch 2.

    Crickey that Android thingy is annoying, aint it ?.

    The phone didn't even have a file manager, so when I got promoted to household IT geek and tasked with migrating files, photos and ringtones from old phone to new one, it was a real PITA.
    I can't even select her own message alert tone, the phone wont see it, she has to use one of the embedded tones. Its like going backwards 10 years.

    Loaded Astro file manager; Total waist of time, caused the phone to hang.
    Loaded OI file manager; The thing crashes or won't write to certain areas of the phone memory.

    I'm not a massive phone expert, but seems to me that this Theres an app for that fashion seems to have let the manufs off the hook for offering phones that do what you want them too.
    Instead the people in the shop will just tell you to get on Android market, yadda, yadda, and sort it yourself.

    I mean, come on, just a file manager to moving your photos about and ringtones, etc. Its basic stuff. Or perhaps a shell out to the underlying windows mobile just to get to all the settings.

    My old Diamond 2 is a kinda half-way house. Not full Android, so not as slick and pretty, but at least I can arrange my files as I want them and load the SatNav and Memory Map that I have. Its not the best phone in the world (think I still prefer my previous phone, HTC Touch cruise) but at least I can configure it as I want it.

    I don't think the theres even the Sync software for the wildfire.

    If this is Android, then I'm not impressed.

    Sentenced to having to search out the good apps from the poor ones, while not bleeding a load of dollars doing so, isn't what people should be left to, imo.
    🙁

    The contract she got was fairly good, imo, but if I go for the same deal, I'll be selling on, the wildfire with Android, BNIB.

    S

    duclicsic
    Free Member

    The Android security model is excellent. When you go to install an application, the installer knows exactly what aspects of access to, and control over your phone the application uses. You are presented with this before the app installs, so if some basic fart app comes up saying it needs access to your address book or Wi-Fi controls, you know it's malicious. You can even review the access rights each time the application is updated.

    Then comes portability. I have paid for a grand total of three application on the Android market. I can now use these applications on any Android phone from any vendor for as long as I like. I can even install Android on a virtual machine or port it to another device and use my applications there. With Apple you will be able to use your apps on their products only, as long as they allow you to. You are vendor locked, and your investments may not even run on other platforms from the very same vendor.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    > "Lots of spyware"
    Cobblers. Name one.

    Sorry, but the price of no having a vetting process is the occassional malicious app:

    thousands of applications available on this market are granted permissions that have the potential of placing the mobile device, sensitive user data and carrier networks at risk.
    http://threatcenter.smobilesystems.com/?p=1887

    glenh
    Free Member

    Lots of spyware as there's no approval process to get things in the store.

    Er, how about the users own approval process?
    Every android application has to explicitly request permissions at install for phone features. If you install, for example, a picture viewer and it requests access to your contacts and internet access, and you continue to install it they surely you get what you deserve?

    Plus, apple doesn't check the source code of apps, only the functionality and content, so malicious code can easily be built into apps with hidden (say until a certain date) malicious functionality.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    If you install, for example, a picture viewer and it requests access to your contacts and internet access, and you continue to install it they surely you get what you deserve?

    This just in: hackers lie!

    Lets say I create a mapping application. I might request the "Fine Location" and "Internet" permissions.

    Seems fair enough? I need the location to put you on the map and the internet access to stream map tiles.

    Cool. Now I can also use this app to track your position and upload it to the net without your permission. Thanks.

    Then maybe I'll add a feature where you can easily navigate to the address of your stored contacts. So I'll need the "Contacts" permission. Seems reasonable.

    Nice, now I can upload all your contact's personal details to any site I like. Thanks again.

    joemarshall
    Free Member

    There's more apps simply because there are more users.

    Although apparently Android is selling more than Apple now in the US, and it is hard to see it not happening over here given how wide a range of Android phones there are nowadays, with even more coming out, compared to 2 or 3 models of iPhone.

    It's much easier to get an app out on the android market though, so hopefully once developers realise the potential, it'll take off quickly.

    Yeah, probably true. I think there's still a question as to how many people will buy expensive apps on Android, with so many having free or ad-supported versions, which might mean slightly less polished apps sometimes, but then there is something to be said for lots of functional but free apps over very polished but expensive apps – I haven't had to pay for an app yet on mine. Android is a hell of a lot easier and nicer to develop for, and much easier to distribute apps too.

    Joe

    Solo
    Free Member

    Still don't change the fact that Manufs should provide a basic suite of software on their phones, which allow the user to access the phone's capability.

    Then if the community want additional apps, for which the phone has the capacity to be used for these apps, then thats where the app markets can step-in.

    In this day-n-age any mid to upper range phone should allow the user to add a ringtone and message alert tone.
    🙄

    S

    Edit: Cool. Now I can also use this app to track your position and upload it to the net without your permission. Thanks.

    The GF's phone has a map facility on it, might be "G-Maps".
    I got the impression it worked from the GPS antenna, and didn't rely on data connection.

    Am I wrong ?….

    Solo
    Free Member

    Joe.

    Seems that you might know more about Android apps.

    Could you recommend me a good file manager app for the GF's HTC wildfire ?.

    Solo

    joemarshall
    Free Member

    Lets say I create a mapping application. I might request the "Fine Location" and "Internet" permissions.

    Seems fair enough? I need the location to put you on the map and the internet access to stream map tiles.

    Cool. Now I can also use this app to track your position and upload it to the net without your permission.

    Yeah, and you could do exactly the same on the iPhone – there's no way the Apple approval process would know.

    The Apple approval process serves two purposes –
    1) It makes sure things that completely suck, or just don't work at all don't get onto the iPhone app store, which is good.
    2) It makes sure things that compete with Apple, or that do something Apple don't want you to do on their phones, or provide alternative ways to do things that Apple provide (like alternative ways to read email, web etc.) are not allowed.

    An interesting example at the moment is swype / shapewriter keyboards, which seem like they may well provide a faster and better text input method for touch screen phones – on Android, they are coming as keyboards that work in all programs, so you can try these supposed better keyboards for everything, email, web, messages etc. whereas on iPhone currently you can just use them in their own notepad apps, as apps aren't allowed to mess with the system like that.

    Joe

    joemarshall
    Free Member

    Seems that you might know more about Android apps.

    Could you recommend me a good file manager app for the GF's HTC wildfire ?.

    I use 'file manager' by Apollo Software.

    Free and seems to work okay.

    Or you can just plug it into the PC and mount it as a disk drive to copy stuff across.

    Oh yeah, there are apps to let you install custom ring and alert tones, although if you want to bypass them, you can stick them in 'media/audio/ringtones' and 'media/audio/notifications' on the sd card, and they should come up in the list.

    For PC sync, there is HTC sync, although I don't sync via PC ever, I just sync everything back to my google account – I've wiped the phone and everything came back okay.

    Joe

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Yeah, and you could do exactly the same on the iPhone – there's no way the Apple approval process would know.

    Possibly. AFAIK we don't know what the secretive Apple approval process involves. They could well be examining source code line-by-line, and/or they may have automated tools to scan code for malware/spyware type behaviour, and/or they may run apps through some kind of sandbox test to check what they do.

    glenh
    Free Member

    joemarshall – Member
    Lets say I create a mapping application. I might request the "Fine Location" and "Internet" permissions.
    Seems fair enough? I need the location to put you on the map and the internet access to stream map tiles.

    Cool. Now I can also use this app to track your position and upload it to the net without your permission.

    Yeah, and you could do exactly the same on the iPhone – there's no way the Apple approval process would know.

    +1. Same on any platform really, not just phone platforms.

    Incidentally, Google has just released a web based software developer tool for 'non-developers' where people can easily put together their own apps for Android using basic functional 'blocks'.

    Building your own apps resolves the problem of course… 🙂

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    The GF's phone has a map facility on it, might be "G-Maps".
    I got the impression it worked from the GPS antenna, and didn't rely on data connection.

    I don't know the app, but unless it comes with a complete map of the world built-in then it'll probably get her position from the GPS antenna and the appropriate map tiles from the internet via a data connection.

    maxray
    Free Member

    Solo I use Linda File manager.

    You can easily transfer things across though by just plugging it into your pc via your usb cable and dragging photos create folder etc. So if you got all your other halfs stuff off her phone onto your pc you could just drag it all across.

    funkynick
    Full Member

    Solo… I've not had any problem with Astro myself, but you could also look into SwiFTP which allows you to set the phone up as an FTP server on your WiFi network, and then you can move bit about quite easily using your PC.

    Glenh… I just had a brief look at the AppInventor, and ooooh.. it does look very promising… now to try writing some mapping software using downloaded OS map tiles… :o)

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Eh?? How is that remotely possible when the App Store has seven times as many apps available?

    Without looking at what those apps are, it's hard to say for sure. I'm basing that comment on situations where I've wanted a specific app, eg a PIM app, I can't immediately think of something useful that's been on one and not the other. There does seem to be a large number of nonsense apps for both platforms, little flash-like demos with miaowing kittens and virtual lightsabers and such, maybe that accounts for some of the slack?

    The phone didn't even have a file manager

    Never had a problem with Astro personally, but I use Estrong's File Manager these days. Integrated FTP and network support, pretty nifty.

    How many other phones come with file managers?

    just a file manager to moving your photos about and ringtones, etc.

    Why do you need this? Photos are managed through the gallery, and Android will find media irrespective of where you stick it. If you want to copy files to / from the PC 'traditionally', the phone will mount as an external storage device over USB and you can do what you like.

    Theres an app for that fashion seems to have let the manufs off the hook for offering phones that do what you want them too.

    Conversely, when you get supplied with all these apps that most users probably don't need, we accuse them of being bloatware. Can't win.

    I don't think the theres even the Sync software for the wildfire.

    The thinking here is that you sync over the air using Google's calendar etc. rather than messing about with cables.

    Sentenced to having to search out the good apps from the poor ones, while not bleeding a load of dollars doing so, isn't what people should be left to, imo.

    I agree – for some people. This is the point I made previously. Personally I prefer having a choice, and am happy to ask for recommendations if needs be. It'd be boring if we were all the same.

    Sorry, but the price of no having a vetting process is the occassional malicious app

    Again, name one. See also, duclicsic's post.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Again, name one. See also, duclicsic's post.

    Did you read the SMobile security report I linked?

    I can't "name one", I don't follow the Android scene, but as I described I could sit down and write such an app tomorrow if I was so inclined, so it is naïve to assume that no one else has.

    "Security" based on asking the user for a small set of very coarse permissions is pretty bogus.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I did follow the link, though I didn't read the PDF. Nonetheless, "security concerns" is not the same thing as "lots of spyware," as was originally implied.

    I have safety "concerns" every time I cross the road. That doesn't mean I get run over six times a day.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Moreover, you're right, if it's such a massive security hole, it's surprising that it's not been exploited yet. And yet, it hasn't. I wonder what this tells us?

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Just had a closer look at the security report. It's produced by a company selling mobile security products. Nice reliable, unbiased source, then.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    From the article:

    …one in every five applications request permissions to access private or sensitive information that an attacker could use for malicious purposes. One out of every twenty applications has the ability to place a call to any number without interaction or authority from the user. More frighteningly, 29 applications were found to request the exact same permissions as applications that are known to be spyware … 383 applications were found to have the ability to read or use the authentication credentials from another service or application. Finally, 3 % of all of the Market submissions that have been analyzed could allow an application to send unknown premium SMS messages without the users interaction or authorization.

    You may think that is biased but their data is simply from looking at the permissions that the apps request.

    Are you telling me that no one actually installs any of these apps because everyone with an Android phone is smart enough to look at the requested permissions and identify all possible security and privacy threats?

    Tell me how you would recognise the threat posed by my theoretical trojan map app that I described above?

    Solo
    Free Member

    Joe.

    Thanks for that, I shall give your recommendations a go.
    😀

    I don't think HTC have released a version of their sync software, for the WildFire, yet. I had a look over on their website and got that impression.

    Graham_S
    I don't know the app, but unless it comes with a complete map of the world built-in then it'll probably get her position from the GPS antenna and the appropriate map tiles from the internet via a data connection.

    Yes, I think you may be correct. I had a quick look at the maps app last night. I'm not sure I'm happy about that method of Navigation, etc.
    I mean, she's OK as she has unlimited data connection as part of the package, but the fact that her location might be some how uploaded to wherever, bothers me.
    Its a bit big-brother, if your use of data connection SatNav can be monitored.
    Still, my version of TomTom won't run on Android, so its more bucks to get a newSatNav package onto her phone.

    MaxRay.
    Thanks too for that one, I will check that out too.
    😉

    Cougar.
    Conversely, when you get supplied with all these apps that most users probably don't need, we accuse them of being bloatware. Can't win.

    I knew someone would say that, fair point 🙂 but I'm just asking for a phone to come with what is needed for a user to install a couple of MP3/WAV files, whatever, so that they can keep their unique sounds, etc, etc.
    And its still the manufs lightening the load by thinning-out the apps they install, which in turn means that theres less stuff that they need to get working properly on the unit.

    How many other phones come with file managers?

    My last four phones. One of those was a nokia, and that was total cr4p, but the others were HTCs.
    It was back before Android really got onto all HTC phones.
    Hence my now having the Diamond Touch 2. The way I saw it, HTCs phones were all going over to Android and I wanted their most up to date phone, before that happened.
    I think theres an Android ROM now for my phone, but I'll not be installing it and then losing the apps I currently have and like.

    I prefer to run TomTom Nav, Memory Map, Core player, and other stuff.
    Stuff that is established as working, and can be migrated to most any windows phone I may have, for my personal use.
    I think Android may also have backwards compatibility, but its losing the windows based apps that deters me.

    Since the GF got her phone last weekend, I've had my first experience of these app-markets, and I'm not encouraged.

    Surely its not beyond the wit of man to sort Android to run apps from the windows phones. Especially as I believe Android is running on windows mobile anyway.

    Thanks for the recommendation on the file manager, its another I shall check-out.
    😉

    In the end, I think all this should be getting easier, not fragmenting and becoming more complex.

    In principle, I've no problem with perhaps having phones with less apps onboard, while maintaining the capacity to do more and also keeping a certain degree of backwards compatibility.
    And to dove-tail with these phones, app-markets would be fine too, so long as each app available was sure to work as desribed, free or paid for.

    Suppose thats a moon-on-a-stick request 🙄

    Cheers.
    🙂

    Solo

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Yes, I think you may be correct. I had a quick
    look at the maps app last night. I'm not sure I'm
    happy about that method of Navigation, etc.
    I mean, she's OK as she has unlimited data
    connection as part of the package, but the fact
    that her location might be some how uploaded to wherever, bothers me.
    Its a bit big-brother, if your use of data
    connection SatNav can be monitored.

    If you are worried then you could use one of the map apps that allow you to download large areas of map in advance, then no live data connection should be required while in use. (also handy when abroad!)

    e.g. on the iPhone there is MotionX GPS which lets you pre-load OpenStreetMap and OpenCycleMap maps for free. And MemoryMap which lets you buy and load OS maps.

    Android market will doubtless have apps offering the same thing.

    ChrisS
    Free Member
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 71 total)

The topic ‘Android apps? (vs iPhone…)’ is closed to new replies.