I’m struggling to follow your logic.

So the fact that, according you, they look like secret service, that is because they would be more suspicious if they didn’t look like secret service?

Are they trying to hide or be noticed?

If they were trying the hide, then surely the 2nd “MIB” in the video, who incidentally I agree is probably something to do with the security services, would not of walked in front of the camera and gave such an obviously “no comment” type answer when the reporter spoke to him. Surely if he was trying to hide, why would be acting like he did?

From the words you are using, I guess you are ex-military, my guess you did a couple of years in your local TA. Correct?

This:

Contradicts this:

Then you state:

Make your mind up.

Why would he be embarrassed? According to you, he’s just been part of the greatest false flag operation the World has ever known. Professionally it doesn’t get any better!

Or possibly, he’s completely overawed by what he has just witnessed, as were all of us, he has been sent out on the streets to “do something”, not sure exactly what but “something”, by his boss and also as he thinks he should be doing something. But what is he meant to do? Nobody knows. Everyone is just reeling and coming to terms with what is happening. The City is in chaos.

he wasn’t a random person, he worked freelance for Fox, what are the odds that out of all the people they could have picked to interview it happened to be this guy…

What are the odds that out of the hundreds of thousands of people, possibly millions within spitting distance of the towers that one of them happened to be one of the many thousands that had worked for Fox?

Quite high you mentalist. 💡

“3 high rise steel structure buildings collapse mainly due to fire on the same day….very….you get it… high rise steel structure buildings collapse mainly due to fire on the same day….very….you get it…”
You realise that 100% of all skyscrapers damaged by fires caused by airliners flying into their upper floors have collapsed in this way ?
Also 100% of all high rise buildings built over holes damaged by debris from two falling skyscrapers where fires have been burning unchecked for seven hours collapse in this way ?

[/quote]Back to your video what is the point for the conspiracy in having an actor give that interview at that time ?

To reinforce the false narrative.

Indeed. I’m guessing the honest answer to that is

“Everything they say is lies”

And the people who think like that, just trawl around looking for scraps of “proof” to justify their position.

There is no critical thought involved whatsoever.

It’s just an entrenched position (that everything is a conspiracy) and then a trawl for “justification by YouTube”

All totally pointless.

So this whole conspiracy has been blown wide open, by a 3 minute interview, that is so badly planned and handled by the same team who planned and executed the rest if it.

I bet you the rest of that project team was pissed!

All that work, weeks of crawling through floor spaces and access spaces, fitting miles of det cord, preparing charges, high jacking aircraft, executing civilians and/or creating new identities for them, destroying tonnes of evidence etc etc, and the whole lot is for nowt, because of a interview, that’s pretty pointless in the scheme of things, blows the cover.

If I was on the operational team, I would be having words with the false narrative reinforcement team. Talk about dropping the ball!

its nuts that they think the secret service guy would just mill around in the background clearly visible and this proof. The beauty though is if he had moved out of shot he would be trying to hide and that would be proof

we have a man in a suit in a city…its hardy unusual…but its proof of the conspiracy

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That explains all the cylindrical holes, punched into the wtc buildings…

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/X5iENXvM43U/hqdefault.jpg

Time tunnels, obviously!

Hmm, now where were we, last I remember no-one was disputing the facts presented here… speak now if you find any errors

Over the last month, Al Waleed Bin Talal and Bandar Bin Sultan have both reportedly been detained as part of the Saudi Purge; there have also been suggestions of further investigation into the Al-Yamamah deal

Still no word on Turki Bin Faisal though…

Feathered Cocaine

With some of the richest and most powerful men in the world visiting these falconry camps, the camps also attract some of the world’s most undesirable — like weapons smuggler and the inspiration for the movie, Lord of War, Viktor Bout, who was frequently a guest at royal falconry camps. But the most infamous guest was Osama bin Laden, who, for many years, made annual visits to the royal falconry camps in both Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates during a time when he was already wanted around the world for mass murder. Former Saudi Ambassador, Prince Turki bin Faisal hunted with bin Laden often, and bin Laden was a VIP guest at the falconry camp organized by the former foreign minister from the U.A.E. bin Laden was so involved in falconry during the ‘90s and 2000s, that during the time he lived in Kandahar, Afghanistan, he stole most of the falcons from the surrounding tribes for his own personal use, giving the best birds as gifts to royal sheiks in the Emirates, and princes in Saudi Arabia.

Not forgetting of course that it was Turki bin Faisal’s sister (Bandar Bin Sultan’s wife) who was involved in money finding it’s way from the Riggs account set up by the UK paymaster general to the hijackers support network.

Though it’s not a direct mention of the falconry camps, there is this Time Article:

(To clarify, that’s the same Turki Bin Faisal… his full name is actually Turki bin Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud )

If there’s any gaps you need filling in of the details provided within that post, do tell. [/quote]

So what are these sources? Single articles or corroborated documentary evidence?

I’d rather take your conclusions that have been repeatedly asked for, but repeatedly not given.

It’s getting a bit daft now.

Are you embarrassed or something ?

I would have a touch more faith in Chilcot than some random bloke on the internet.

Jive can you articulately and concisely explain what you think the conspiracy behind 9/11 is without use of links, cut and paste or random photos that juxtapose famous people.

POSTED 1 DAY AGO #
Still waiting! Just saying like…

That you say “more is to come” suggests you have delivered something of import already. This is not the case.

“I’m not going to be part of looking at information only partially. I’m not going to be part of just coming to quick conclusions. I’m not going to be part of political pressure to do this or not do that. I’m not going to be part of that. This is serious.”
It doesn’t mean anything, not one single thing at all. I mean, do explain if you think that means something but I’ve read it a few times and it doesn’t mean anything.

Yeah, and he said that, what, 15 years ago ?

And he was probably right to say it too.

You however, are just using it as an excuse to talk shit without stating an opinion.

Sad.

Sums up your efforts perfectly.

So no conclusions no evidence no facts ?

Well, you waited long enough for the Chilcot report and you were paying for that… much like you were paying for the war that led to it and the contractors Her Majesty’s government chose.

How would you feel if you were paying Turki Bin Faisal’s wages?

Bandar Bin Sultan’s?

Osama Bin Laden’s?

So no conclusions no evidence no facts ?

And ?

What does any of that prove ?

.

(Same post cut and pasted from when I posted it half an hour ago 🙄 )