Have a search for previous threads (many of which I’ve replied to, so have a look through my history), but basically you would lose out on very little in terms of range.
26/36 would be your lowest gear with a 2×10, which is only a very small amount taller than 22/32 which is probably your lowest gear on your current 9spd setup. You wouldn’t really notice it. If you went 3×10, you would have 24/36 as your lowest gear, which is marginally lower, but do you really need that low a gear?
At the top end, 38/11 would be your tallest gear as opposed to 42/11. In reality, you would lose out very little again, as 38/11 is still taller than 42/13 (big ring, 9th cog in a 3×10 setup) so you’re losing a very small amount.
In reality the difference is that you get less doubling up of the ratios, and more useful ratios overall. You won’t have the conventional 32T middle ring that most people have become used to, which confuses a lot of people, but in reality you lose maybe half a ratio maximum at either end of the scale (perfectly acceptable IMO) and you gain simplicity and lose some weight.
Or go 1×10, you only lose a couple of ratios either end of the spectrum (still manageable for a lot of people) and it’s sooooo much simpler!