To achieve full travel, you’ll be squashing the bottom-out bumper.
No bottom out bumper in Rockshox to speak of… So full travel should be able to be attained if you hit the fork hard enough (or its set up too softly) rather than it ramping up too much at the end of the stroke.
If you really want all 120mm travel, then get a set of 130-140mm forks, innit?
Not really, geometry is critical too, and frames are usually designed to work best with a fork of a specific axle to crown length. Also, almost every fork I’ve owned ever has at least been tunable to make sure you can (if required) get all of the available quoted travel. The 2 exceptions to this were a pair of 2007 Marzocchi 66SL’s that just wouldn’t give more than 160 of their quoted 180mm travel (they ramped up WAY too much), and a pair of 2001 Rockshox SID SL’s that wouldn’t give more than 65mm of their quoted 80mm for exactly the same reason.
Rumour has it that rockshox never put the correct amount of oil in, so replace it as soon as you buy them. I’ve had to do this with 2010 rev race and these SID’s.
This is often the case to be fair, and if that’s all it is, then I’ll not worry. Usually forks come with sub-par oil inside anyway, so it often pays to replace with good quality full synthetics fairly soon. I know Marzocchi used to underfill a lot of forks which meant they seemed too linear, similar to Maverick DUC32’s from the factory too.
can the travel be reduced to 100mm with spacers? RS make a 100mm model but not with a maxle.
Yup, they can be spaced down to 100mm with a spacer. The SID range is quoted as being 2 distinct forks, one optimised for 120/100mm of travel, and the other as 100/80mm of travel.