I wonder if DH and even XC would have more general appeal if the TV coverage looked like that. Then there would be more money in it for the riders.
Because that probably changed cameras every 3 to 4 seconds? Over a 4 minute run that would need ~70 cameras. And each one would have to get it perfect, and the director would have to be perfect. All that for a couple of thousand viewers at most in the UK. Compared to Sky doing a premiership game with 3 cameras and charging millions of people £50 a month to watch it.
The BBC covered the Worlds at Fort William a few years back and it was a bit pants, lots of shakey telephoto stuff of the top section and nadda in the woods. We’re not a sport that’ll ever look good on live TV as to look good you either need lots of cameras, or crap tracks out in the open.
Skiing is a comparably niche sport, with probably a comparable “ohh that looks exciting” factor for the broader population. So Ski Sunday was good telly as it’s cheep to make as the whole track could be covered by relatively few cameras. But racing bikes down a ski run would be dull.