Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Why are air can reducers (apparently) needed on so many bikes?
  • vinnyeh
    Full Member

    Surely so many manufacturers can’t be speccing, or asking for, the wrong shock.
    Only sensible reason I can think of is that we’re all a load heavier than the development riders. Is that correct?

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Fashun

    Just like folk buying bikes that are too small, bars that are suddenly wider, shorter stems etc etc etc

    Houns
    Full Member

    And posting things thrice?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    VERY fashionable.

    It’s because not everyone likes their bikes to ride exactly the same. And possibly because lots of manufacturers realise that mincers complain if they don’t use all the travel while riding over an acorn, while everyone else is gratified to discover they ride the bike so damn hard they need to alter the suspension setup.

    Houns
    Full Member

    And posting things thrice?

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Wow! That should be impossible. I suspect a forum glitch.

    brokenbanjo
    Full Member

    To label the point.

    brant
    Free Member

    Because people want bottomless squish

    Drac
    Full Member

    A dodgy connection and itchy finger can cause more than one post.

    vinnyeh
    Full Member

    Was that me then? Didn’t see.. Connection dropped.

    So, what are the manufacturers trying to deliver instead of the bottomless squish that the punters want?

    I am genuinely curious about this.

    goodgrief
    Free Member

    Adding a volume reducer at the consumer level is easier and less costly than changing the air can sleeve, they’re doing us a favour.

    JCL
    Free Member

    Northwind is bang on. People like wallowing around in the travel vortex. That’s why Santa Cruz’s are so popular.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Was that me then?

    Well given you posted after I mentioned it then, no it wasn’t you. 😀

    kimbers
    Full Member

    person who mtbs are designed around/for

    average stwer

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    Cos lots of people reckon they know more about bike set up, suspension & how it should work on a certain bike in a certain situation than a multi-million pound bike company, or maybe not. You decide

    nuke
    Full Member

    Since its been asked, I put one in my RP23 because the travel is linear, as told to me by the frame designer, and it just so happened that their design/QA resulted in the rocker very slightly hitting the seattube when the travel bottomed out…spacer went in reducing this, not ideal as fundamentally the design shouldn’t have allowed the rocker to hit but there we go 😐

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    Since its been asked, I put one in my RP23 because the travel is linear, as told to me by the frame designer, and it just so happened that their design/QA resulted in the rocker hitting the seattube when the travel bottomed out…spacer went in reducing this, not ideal as fundamentally the design shouldn’t have allowed the rocker to hit but there we go

    Surely that’s just speccing a shock with too much travel?

    nuke
    Full Member

    Surely that’s just speccing a shock with too much travel?

    Shock stroke and length was as specced by the company with correct tune. Apparently tolerances were tight…it would barely hit but enough to damage the paint/finish.

    I could of course have put more air in the shock but the spacer method allowed me to run the shock at a pressure good for riding and not damage prevention

    Simon
    Full Member

    What frame’s that then?

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Hemlock

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    Heretic.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Cos lots of people reckon they know more about bike set up, suspension & how it should work on a certain bike in a certain situation than a multi-million pound bike company, or maybe not.

    Or, people ride different terrains in different styles, and want to tune their bikes appropriately. We have adjustments for lots of things, why would spring rate not be one of them?

    My shock has a knob for adjusting spring rate anyway.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    steve_b77 – Member

    Cos lots of people reckon they know more about bike set up, suspension & how it should work on a certain bike in a certain situation than a multi-million pound bike company, or maybe not. You decide

    OK, you are a Santa Cruz Heckler owner. Santa Cruz definitely got the shock volume exactly right. Even though they fitted a bunch of different shock bodies down the years, seemingly at random, they were all perfect and unimprovable. Course, a punter fitting a smaller air can or an aircan spacer must be wrong.

    Your bike was not designed to suit you. It was designed to suit everyone.

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    Thought it was mainly because Fox designed a load of crap shocks with no compression in the mid stroke?

    Rorschach
    Free Member

    Fox designed a load of crap shocks with no compression in the mid stroke

    You are Danny Milner and I claim my £5 Bullshit bingo prize.

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    Northwind – Member

    OK, you are a Santa Cruz Heckler owner.

    Couldn’t be further away if you tried, I’ve ridden a couple (heckler and superlight) briefly, but never owned one.

    I’ve had a three FS bikes and am currently riding an Anthem 29er

    Rorschach
    Free Member

    Whilst typing?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    steve_b77 – Member

    Couldn’t be further away if you tried,

    That wasn’t to be taken literally 😆

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Because like most things you only hear about those people who want to change it, nobody ever took the time to post how they are happy with their bike and ask about upgrading nothing. Same as all diesel cars blow up due to particulate filters etc.

    Manufactures will try and hit 2 things – feels good in the shop and fits most people. You can’t accommodate everyone with that. Same as most don’t offer you the coil springs for your fork that you need just the ones inside.

    I’d be interested to see some good fun tests where people got their shocks swapped round and were asked to decide which had the mods and which didn’t – see how much emperors new clothes is going on.

    JCL – Member
    Northwind is bang on. People like wallowing around in the travel vortex. That’s why Santa Cruz’s are so popular.

    Did the syndicate turn you down or something 😉

    sq225917
    Free Member

    1. Because we all fatties who like endless travel but want bikes stiff enough to climb with.

    I blow through the travel on my Meta sx unless it’s at 200psi.

    mikey3
    Free Member

    Because we need them,mountain biking is a need/fasion thing like every other facet of modern life,and you have the skillz

    JCL
    Free Member

    Did the syndicate turn you down or something

    Yep it was Greg or me. Huge mistake on their part.

    I should add that there’s nowt wrong with their single pivots but I could go on all day about counter rotating links!

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    It’s OK you do… personally the straight single pivot relying on the shock is much more of a weakness. I guess it’s personal preference rather than black and white fact.

    b45her
    Free Member

    you’d be amazed how many 2014 bikes have volume reducers fitted to them by the manufacturers.
    the fox 34’s on my 527ei spicy will be for sale as soon as zocchi 350cr’s become available. fox stuff has been overpriced shite for a number of years now.

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    Rorschach – Member
    Whilst typing?

    Why yes, of course. I was also whipping up a smoked salmon soufflé and hand pressing a vile of super extra Virgin olive oil.

    mattbee
    Full Member

    Sick edit or it didn’t happen.

    julianwilson
    Free Member

    Whatever happened to AVA shocks? Wife has one on her rad bike but at 8 1/2 stone she doesn’t really notice any difference between different sleeve settings/volumes.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    pressing a vile vial of super extra Virgin olive oil.

    ftfy.

    Posting whilst riding is no excuse 😉

    mindmap3
    Free Member

    Because it makes some shocks work better on certain frames? It certainly made my DHX Air feel better on my SX Trail but made my CCDBa on the Rune feel horrible.

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)

The topic ‘Why are air can reducers (apparently) needed on so many bikes?’ is closed to new replies.