molgrips – Member
So is there historical precedent for this level of disruption to politics and society? I think Thatch was pretty controversial at the time no?
Thatcher was an economic reformer.
Cameron tried to be (you judge) a social reformer.
David Cameron may have declared he loves his country. Obviously he couldn’t have been referring to the UK.
DC has betrayed the UK to his own beliefs. He was elected for reasons/pledges which included holding a referendum. Now he has a result he doesn’t like, he refuses to do his job. Too worried about his image/place in history.
Disruption? Very much and a lot of it, consequently by design. DC avoiding his duty in the hope of reversing the outcome of a referendum, via a back door.
However, the world is watching and to anyone with even a modest awareness of this, knows the UK gov must respect the result of such a vote.