Bonj – I thought you were saying you just wanted a phone now you have moved on to say you want it to be an alarm clock as well. Make your mind up. If you look at the cost of all of the standalone devices that could offer similar levels of functionality they would be more than the cost of an iphone. Also why would I want to cart around 4 devices when one can do what I want.
don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind if it didn't have an alarm clock, in fact i would be quite happy to spend a tenner on another stand alone alarm clock to keep at my mate's house for the odd time i stay there and need to wake up.
But the fact that it always wakes me up even when off, means it does the job of an alarm clock just as well as a stand alone one.
The fact that an iphone doesn't just proves it is too advanced for its own good and forgets the simple but useful functions of a phone.
AFAIK it's not just my tesco value nokia but all simple phones have always done this. Samsungs, sony ericssons, etc. – it's taken for granted. But then the iphone comes the big I am and apparently it is too advanced to have to bother with such menial things like that. apple are far too arty farty to bother building into the iphone the capability for the alarm to switch the phone on, probably because its software is built on far too many layers and the alarm function is far too high level to be able to do it. this is another reason why it's battery life is poor, too – its software is just so much more advanced than it needs to be for a phone, and its target audience are already far too transfixed to care.