Probably a bit of a common choice but in the context of what the OP was talking about its Pulp fiction for me.
The way it’s chopped into a set of out of sequence episodes, the characterisation, the dialogue, the framing of shots. It jumps between filming styles in places to suit the scene. The audience get to watch certain scenes knowing more than the characters in it, and the fact that several plot events happen completely off-screen but the exposition is handled without being clunky… It’s a master class in keeping an audience engaged.
It’s all very deliberate and you can see much of the intention on first viewing, but other things click after the second or third viewing. It’s peak Tarantino.
I’m also a weirdo though and like Wes Anderson films (most people seem not to), I re-watched the Royal Tenenbaums the other day and after seeing the French Dispatch, Anderson is a very consistent director, his style appeals to me, I can understand why others might not like him though.