Viewing 40 posts - 1,721 through 1,760 (of 2,074 total)
  • The F1 2015 thread…
  • shermer75
    Free Member

    Pretty excited about the idea of a rival series. It could certainly solve a lot of problems, and would mean double the amount of F1! 🙂

    shermer75
    Free Member

    Hopefully they’ll run it on alternate weekends to Bernie’s F1 and keep it to non-paywalll TV. Lovely 🙂

    andytherocketeer
    Full Member

    redbull.tv probably

    aracer
    Free Member

    Yeah, but LH doesn’t have a Red Bull WC title

    shermer75
    Free Member

    redbull.tv probably

    That would make sense!

    slackalice
    Free Member

    Very interesting article and I for one, feel that as it stands at the moment, F1 has run its course. Power train complexities have meant that it is extremely difficult and expensive to enter and compete and despite a Brit leading the drivers championship for the last two seasons, my interest in the action has dwindled to a passing glance at the results. Even the ‘action packed’ races seem to hold one or two overtakes or a chassis crunching accident.

    I’ve watched a couple of the Formula E races that were around Battersea Park and those too were dull, noiseless, and held on a circuit that made the local country lanes where I live look like perfectly smooth and wide Autoroutes. So that option, even ignoring the fact that the cars don’t last the full race, provides me with no incentive to watch anymore. I’m a fickle viewer.

    A new race series, in relatively simple and inexpensive cars would be a great idea IMO and I’d love to see it happen and grow.

    Alternatively, forget about televising the circuit, round and round type of motorsport and televise something like Hillclimbing instead. Huge variety of cars that the public can better relate to and against the clock. Cheaper to televise and some awesome courses could be developed for a lot less money, without even considering some of the mountain roads that already exist. Hillclimbing up to Mt Ventoux, or Alpes Duez anyone?

    back2basics
    Free Member

    It’s appeal could be in using older f1 circuits but also knowing red bull it could also introduce different types of racing in the one series for example
    Hill climbing
    Drifting
    Ice racing in f1 style car
    And the same goes for dirt out sand races
    Rbr have run thier own f1 car on ice and in Texas on the race track before it was tarmac
    Deep inside me wants this. But.. It’s a big big risk….

    richmars
    Full Member

    It’s appeal could be in using older f1 circuits but also knowing red bull it could also introduce different types of racing in the one series for example
    Hill climbing
    Drifting
    Ice racing in f1 style car
    And the same goes for dirt out sand races
    Rbr have run thier own f1 car on ice and in Texas on the race track before it was tarmac
    Deep inside me wants this. But.. It’s a big big risk….

    But that’s not F1, and kind of already exists (apart from F1 on ice).
    F1, for me, is the fastest cars, with the best drivers, designed by the best engineers. The race is about 40% of the whole F1 thing.
    But I’m a geeky engineer. Others have different views.

    ineedabeer
    Free Member

    I for one hope they do it, I used to be a big F1 fan but the sport is now getting dull its no longer about the best drivers and cars its about who has the deepest pockets. I for one think a Red Bull world champ would hopefully bring something fresh that is sadly lacking in Bernie world, the bloke should retire!

    richmars
    Full Member

    [/quote] who has the deepest pockets

    Hasn’t that always been the case? Deepest pockets means the best drivers and engineers (=car). Ok, there are always exceptions when a new driver starts out, or someone like Colin Chapman has inspired ideas, but most of the time money buys success.
    If you want close racing, F1 has never been the best formula.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    FOr years F! has just been about who has the fastest car rather than who is th ebest driver

    Reality is we do not know if seb is better than Hamilton or Alonso all we can say is who has the best engineers /designers

    Given this , and teams tending to dominate, it has become more about tyre maintenance than actual driver ability
    I am surprised anyone actually bothers to watch the complete races tbh. they are often like processions ans overtaking often takes place via the pits and strategy

    There must be something to take its place for petrol heads surely ?

    aracer
    Free Member

    That’s a difficult one, because F1 is supposed to be the height of technology and engine manufacturers have said they’re not interested in just making big multi cylinder engines because they have no relevance to the future powertrains for road cars. If they’re going to be at the leading edge then hybrid it is. What needs sorting out is some way for those who are behind to be able to catch up whilst limiting the spending – I don’t know the answer to that.

    Even the ‘action packed’ races seem to hold one or two overtakes or a chassis crunching accident.

    Alternatively, forget about televising the circuit, round and round type of motorsport and televise something like Hillclimbing instead. Huge variety of cars that the public can better relate to and against the clock.

    How much overtaking do you get in hillclimbing? Personally I reckon I might watch one or two races and then not bother.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Hillclimbing – yeah right!

    If people really were interested in overtaking and close racing then BTCC would be prime-time and draw in millions of viewers.

    F1 has many aspects to it, so it draws in fans for lots of different reasons.

    bombjack
    Free Member

    F1 is so much more than the racing – Its the perceived glamour, the danger, the speed, the fans, the history…
    If RB were serious about looking into an alternative formula then they’d do well to look at other series which have failed – A1GP and superformula are the first 2 which spring to mind. All promised close racing, decent drivers, great tracks. Both failed to take off.
    Like him or loath him Berne has “made” current f1 (and by current I mean the last 30 years worth). He’ll probably broker some sort of deal to make RB stay, TBH it wouldn’t surprise me if they keep Renault engines for another year, especially if there is a concession to be made with regard the buying of the Lotus team…

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Aye bernie will bribe someone [ not in an illegal way as he is above that sort of thing as my lawyer said the other day ] to get his way/save the day

    cheekymonkey888
    Free Member

    Its a bit late but I just watched the Button Rally cross video on bbc
    Nice bit of history and genuine fun.

    Its attractive racing like attractive football that people are craving for. I dont want to see them hoofing the ball up to the big guy up front.
    I think Berbie has successfully lined his pockets.

    aracer
    Free Member

    Me neither – especially if that wastegate thing up there is true, at which point Renault suddenly becomes a far more attractive option.

    Carrot or stick? How was the TV coverage for those teams being awkward at the last race?

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Looks like another Magnussen who’s leaving F1 early and not going to achieve his potential…

    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/121346

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    dont know I dont watch the races anymore- endless talk of tyre management and strategies because not much racing is happening- as its more fun to watch the highlights

    Twodogs
    Full Member

    I think F1 should be cars going as fast as the drivers dare drive, not limited by tyres or fuel flow/amount, and less constricted design. Try that for a year or two and see if that brings back the excitement.
    for sure, the team with the most money will probably win most, but with more innovation allowed, you get things like the Brawn team suddenly dreaming up something amazing

    nemesis
    Free Member

    We had some of the worst racing when the cars were like that.

    Also, there’s a limit to how fast the cars should go – fans don’t want to see drivers killed and that’s the risk if you open things up too much.

    FWIW, I agree that innovation should be the target rather than just more iterations by having more money. I loved the McL F-duct because it was simple but had a clear advantage (though funnily enough once other teams did it, their solutions were better). Allow that sort of thing for the season and and then ban them.

    ScottChegg
    Free Member

    TBH it wouldn’t surprise me if they keep Renault engines for another year

    I think Renault will still bear the brusies from this year and all RB’s name calling and bad press.

    If Renault have their own team, that will be the focus for any engine upgrades, not the RB whine squad. So they will still be behind in the engine game.

    They’ve had a crap year and played it really badly. McL have had a worse year and (for the most part) been loyal to Honda.

    McL are not talking about flouncing off; despite having their worse year ever.

    Twodogs
    Full Member

    I’d rather have the kind of racing we had then than using artificial aids like DRS to “improve overtaking”. If we’re going to have DRS, then let the drivers use it whenever they like (or dare)

    nemesis
    Free Member

    I disagree actually though I don’t like DRS. It’s worth noting too that plenty of overtakes are non-DRS ones at present and those just weren’t happening in the 2000s.

    Anyway, ground effect and remove the reliance on the wings would massively reduce the issues of losing downforce when following other cars.

    ScottChegg
    Free Member

    ground effect and remove the reliance on the wings would massively reduce the issues of losing downforce when following other cars.

    But would increase danger when clipping wheels. The bad old days of getting a ‘launch’ would return.

    It’s no good having lovely soft barriers when the cars go over the top.

    dooosuk
    Free Member

    Restrictions on engine development in season look like they will be eased. Honda must be happy!

    Moe
    Full Member

    What would be wrong with a handicap system built into the token allocation?

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    But would increase danger when clipping wheels. The bad old days of getting a ‘launch’ would return.

    It’s no good having lovely soft barriers when the cars go over the top.
    Maybe you could get rid of most aero, cover up the wheels etc, and still have close, exciting racing?

    ScottChegg
    Free Member

    They wn’t launch. Too slow, too heavy

    aracer
    Free Member

    Does Bernie reckon his position completely impregnable then? I was going to describe his latest utterances as controversial, but actually I don’t think there is any controversy over how wrong headed they are. Just a couple of choice selections:

    If people allegedly have been corrupted to make things happen in their country, it’s good. It’s a tax football had to pay.

    no place for democracy (in Russia)

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/34552570

    The sooner we’re rid of him, whatever that takes, the better

    Trimix
    Free Member

    Bernie might talk rubbish, but he’s 80+, rich as f*ck and have you seen his wife ?

    There’s a bloke who wont care what anyone thinks and probably knows he hasn’t got much longer to enjoy life.

    I hope I’m enjoying his lifestyle when I’m that old. But chances are I will be wearing a nappy in some run down old peoples home, dribbling into my soup.

    cheekymonkey888
    Free Member

    Its a shame the judicial system in Germany spared him jail.

    There’s a bloke who wont care what anyone thinks and probably knows he hasn’t got much longer to enjoy life.

    I guess the same comment could be levelled at any dictator in the world past and present. How they rally round each other. I guess media moguls fall into the same category too 🙂

    hora
    Free Member

    Evening. Everytime a new circuit is introduced a bit more of me leaves F1. I think Silverstone will be gone soon, they had to defer 2015’s F1 payment. So in 2016 can they afford 2x’?

    New souless, fanless tracks plus Bahrain who wants that?

    PJM1974
    Free Member

    Bernie was relevant once. He was a maverick team boss, he represented the teams and ensured they received a better deal and he brought F1 into living rooms.

    However, the sport I used to love has become an extension of Bernie’s wheeler-dealer ego, dripping in diamonds and indulging despots to the detriment of the circuits and spectacle that attracted me to F1 in the first place.

    the fact that there’s only three and a half engine manufacturers in the sport should have gotten alarm bells ringing long ago, but the fallback position is for three car grids.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    How many engine manufacturers did it need to make a good competition when Cosworth were supplying engines in the 70s??

    pondo
    Full Member

    When anyone could knock on tje door, pay a few grand and walk away with a competitive DFV, one. Seems a bit different today.

    ScottChegg
    Free Member

    The Chinese are lined up to buy a majority stake in F1.

    Does that mean there will be a Great Wall F1? A Trumpchi Red Bull?

    F1 is about to change dramatically. Not necessarily for the better.

    shermer75
    Free Member

    I think it all goes downhill as soon as you start running a sport to make a profit instead of improving it.

    bluearsedfly
    Free Member

    Tis a tad damp.

    aracer
    Free Member

    and only 3 sets of extreme wet tyres for the weekend. Not a lot of running going to happen in practice even if they are allowed out, given it looks likely they’ll need those for quali and the race.

Viewing 40 posts - 1,721 through 1,760 (of 2,074 total)

The topic ‘The F1 2015 thread…’ is closed to new replies.