I think VAR got both decisions correct, and was used correctly in Decision 1 (D1, the Lallana handball, where it reversed an obvious error) but I think VAR was wrongly used in D2.
Bear with me.
Once you ask it to rule on matters of millimetres and start drawing well meaning but ultimately arbitrary lines on where you think someone’s armpit or toe is then you have to accept what outcome it gives you. That’s what happened in D2, and it showed the Wolves player had started his run a few picoseconds early.
The issue is now we’ve got this concept of the irrefutable line and for all of Souness and the pundit’s twattering on, it doesn’t matter if you change the law to say where you draw the line (feet, armpit, anywhere) or whether you say any bodypart onside is now onside (= more goals), or any part offside = offside, you’ll still be arguing over a few mm on semi arbitrary lines. If you even say we’ll allow 50mm either way of where the line is, there would still be arguments where the line fell 51mm apart whether that 1mm was correct.
In the end we want clear and obvious errors overturned, so trust the on field officials. No-one there on the day thought it was offside, including the Assistant Referee. The footage clearly showed it was microscopically tight, too tight to call. So go with ‘umpires call’ and let the goal stand.
So as I say – used incorrectly but when used as it was, the ‘decision’ was correct.