In real terms thankfully the UK has never had a truly disastrous PM
😯
You could probably rightfully accuse me of being a tad biased, but I don’t think it’s wrong to set the highest standards for those in the highest office, but several 20th/21st century PMs stand out for being disastrous as I’d define it:
Tony Blair is in part responsible for a (conservatively) estimated 150,000 dead in the middle east, committing soldiers to a conflict knowing that the likely result would be an deterioration of security at home. The Chilcott Report makes for sobering reading. I’d say that was pretty lacklustre.
Cameron has failed to deal with the Eurosceptics in his party and as such it’s likely that we’re about to leave the trading bloc upon which our economy is hugely reliant upon. If we don’t leave the EEA, we’ve lost our voice in the EU Parliament, but the bills won’t be falling any time soon. There’s a good chance of a second Scottish Referendum, so he’ll have hamstrung the economy and knackered the Union too. Not bad for someone trying to quell a party feud. It’s a bit like blowing up the bar you and your mates are in to resolve an argument over who’s buying the next round.
Then there’s the failure to provide adequate housing, the UN report condemning how the UK treats disabled people, the food banks, the blind eye toward money laundering…as PM he was ultimately responsible.
Quite a few people would tell you that Thatcher was a disaster too.
Chamberlain failed to stand up to Hitler in the late 1930s, which in hindsight wasn’t the best move for twenty million people.
But other than those minor misdemeanours, Blair helped bring peace to Northern Ireland and the Balkans, Cameron gave us same sex marriages, Thatcher gave us…erm…gave us…I’ll have to get back to you on that. Chamberlain gave us a piece of paper with a Fascist dictator’s autograph on it.