SLX vs XT shifters?
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] SLX vs XT shifters?

22 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
194 Views
Posts: 2418
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As title really, which are "better"? 9 speed models.

Ta, Duane.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had both and couldn't really tell the difference?

EDIT: Apart from the price.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:22 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

SLX are ace! XT feel a little more SRAM-like if that helps...

As in there is more of an obvious tactile "clunk" when changing gear.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had both cant tell the difference either


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:27 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

You're all wrong! The shift indicator needles are every so slightly more orange on XT shifters....or is it the other way around?

*checks*

Bugger.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:29 pm
Posts: 45719
Free Member
 

What is this SLX and XT you speak of? Deore FTW.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:36 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15541
Free Member
 

xt have bearings, slx just bushings. I think xt do feel nicer, but its a feel that fades into the background and disappears when out on the trail.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is the shift indicator removable on slx like it is on xt ?


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I think so...


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:41 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I'd go Deore rather than SLX.

XT from 2006/7 were good.....latest/last 9 spd xt are not very inspring but better than slx.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is the shift indicator removable on slx like it is on xt ?

Yes, just done it this wkend...


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Generally speaking SLX and XT are pretty much the same, but XT shifters are LOADS better than SLX ones. Definitely worth paying extra. XTR are better still.

Edit: Definintely avoid Deore - nowhere near the same league as XTs. People who say otherwise are just deluding themselves. Seriously.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd go Deore rather than SLX.

XT from 2006/7 were good.....latest/last 9 spd xt are not very inspring but better than slx.

Unless you want 2 way release.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SLX come with removable shifter windows and blanking plates

I believe the difference (I've 'stood-tested' both, though at different times) is that XT (2008-2011 9spd) changes slightly quicker

On the release lever (ie going to lesser-toothed-sprockets/harder gears on 'normal' release mechs (not rapid rise), I think XT is supposed to release as soon as you push the lever, whereas SLX won't release until you start to let go of the lever? In reality so long as you don't have some sort of habit where you hold onto the release lever for too long, its going to be a very small difference

I could of course be wrong in thinking all of this ..

"Unless you want 2 way release"
Which Deore 9speed has these days (at least from around mid-2008), though I imagine non-2-way release deore shifters will be hanging around somewhere online and probably came supplied on a few bikes in the meantime?


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:46 pm
Posts: 7583
Free Member
 

XT, SLX feels a bit cheap by comparison with a plastic lever and bushings.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 8:54 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Had both, sold the slx for xts. Much nicer feel imo. Feel more sold and less plasticky.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had 2004 XT shifters, which I reckon were better than my 2009 slx ones. I feel like I might be kidding myself, but I did have them running on different bikes at te same time


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:09 pm
 mrmo
Posts: 10715
Free Member
 

XT are nicer than SLX, the feel, the materials, all just nicer to use. obviously if you then go and reuse some trashed old cables, and never clean anything you may never notice the difference.

my bike currently has one slx shifter and an one older XT shifter, only a matter of months, despite being older it is nicer to use.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:12 pm
Posts: 8393
Full Member
 

XTR has multi-release where you can do two upshifts with one movement of the lever.

You can modify the XT to do the same, but not the SLX. Involves removing an L shaped bit of moulding inside. Brand new 780XT has it as standard(10 speed).

[url= http://forums.mtbr.com/drivetrain-shifters-derailleurs-cranks/how-convert-new-770-xt-shifters-into-%93multi-release%94%85easily-who-needs-xtr-549266.html ]MTBR Thread about the hack[/url]


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:20 pm
Posts: 158
Free Member
 

I had the choice went for XTs they felt nicer. Down shifting feels "lighter" with them.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thought SLX were quite sloppy. Like deore and if i'd not tried XT be more than happy - nice clunky and positive shifts, if slow. Then changed to XT and the shift is way quicker and slicker - hardly need to press the shifter.


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 9:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got slx, xt and xtr and prefer the more expensive ones. I guess you just adapt tho!

I dont know if this is directly related - but got a new bike last month with slx 10 speed shifters and mech and didnt like them at all (felt plasticy / loose for some reason so took all the 10 speed stuff off the back and put the old xtr 9sp shifter / slx mech mish mash back on.

I guess you get used to everything - and whether its better spending extra on a shifter or putting the saving towards a weekend away (or whatever) is up to you!


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 10:11 pm
Posts: 6311
Full Member
 

Bought XT shifters to "complete the groupset" regretted it went back to SLX, fell smoother & less clunky


 
Posted : 24/01/2012 10:47 pm