I’m opposed to it, of course, as I believe such demands on individual behaviour impinge in people’s Human Rights. But what’s not been said on here, is that this is in fact not a tenet of Sharia Law, but a law recently passed in Afghanistan, that is being claimed as deriving from Sharia Law. This is a misinterpretation.
As I’ve said before, there is a gross misunderstanding of Sharia Law, and what it actually states. Contrary to some sensationalist Media hysteria, Sharia is not as oppressive and as draconian as people may think (or believe what they read in the papers).
I think some people really go away and educate themselves on a subject they quite clearly know bugger all about, instead of posting the usual knee-jerk claptrap on here. It gets tiresome.
I will say, that some interprations of Islam, and Sharia Law, in some Islamic countries, are oppressive and deny individuals, especially women, the freedoms tha Islam actually demands of it’s followers. A religion which has been used to control a historically very unruly and unstable region of the World, has traditionally appeared quite strict, and very often, justifiably so. Before Islam united peoples in the Middle East, there was great lawlessness and injustice. Only by being enforced in a strict manner, could Islam gain some form of control over people.
But Islam itself stands for peace and unity, as do most religions. And like others, it will surely take some time before things become more relaxed, and the religion and culture can be viewed and enjoyed, in a more gentle manner.