Wondering if it’d be worth swapping OEM crankset for a narrower one to match what I have on my non-e MTB.
I didn’t even notice riding both back to back when I wasn’t aware of the difference, but I’ve also read of people develop knee issues riding unsuitable q or swapping between q’s regularly. I’m not a big or wide guy, nor do I have big feet, so thought probably no reason to go wider, other than OEM’s penny pinching. There’s plenty of clearance on the bike and cranks with 171 q are available aftermarket. Also the bike would be slightly narrower for avoiding pedal strikes. That said, I seem to favour riding with my feet 2cm from the inboard edge of the pedals on my normal bike, and that’s on a pedal with an axle gap of about 1cm (so it’s not a shoe crank arm clearance issue). Maybe that’s bad for me and wider would exaggerate it.
Obviously if it hurts on a long ride that’s easy and I’ll swap it. But I don’t want to slowly wear away the insides of my knee the wrong way over a couple of years.