Brother cycles sell their steel gravel fork as the option with better “damping”.
More flex maybe but not more damping, carbon damps vibrations more than steel. But the flex is really what matters, the material damping is a fairly subtle thing.
Carbon saves weight over steel but that’s generally about it ime. The main problem with steel disc brake forks seems to be passing the ISO tests at a lower (say 1kg or less) weight. Realistically a non-ISO steel fork could be made lighter and be safe in use (as some custom built forks are) but the tests could kill it. The tests just favour carbon forks.
Having said that I don’t think +/- 500-600g on the steel fork makes any meaningful difference to non-racers as long as the fork has the right flex characteristics, which again can be hard to get right with disc brake forces and the tests required. Fair to say that as much as I prefer the peace of mind and relative safety of a steel fork, there’s a wider range of good to bad in steel. With carbon it’s more about a safe source with good QC and being careful with the steerer tubes in use.