He didn’t travel to Australia for two weeks did he? It wasn’t the day after. The exemption certificate was from the event organisers to compete in the tournament. You may not agree with the sentiment behind his actions or his anti vax stance but I don’t think he’s done anything illegal regarding competing.
But as has already been pointed out, he couldn’t have applied for the exemption certificate by the cut off date because he didn’t know he was going to test positive*
And he couldn’t have booked the flights and hotels for himself and his entourage before then, because he didn’t know he was going to test positive*
And he can’t have got his training plan organised to peak for the Open that he knew he couldn’t enter as he couldn’t get an exemption unless he tested positive*
*or he is actually fully jabbed and doesn’t want any of his anti-vaxx mates to find out.
Will the legal scrap relate solely to procedural errors over the visa, or is anyone going to point out the three blatant lies obvious discrepancies in his story?