I’ve always assumed it would be something I’d get used to, but I’ve noticed it on all the 29er demos I’ve had. Moreso at fast swoopy trail centres than on natural trails though.
I like 29ers, but I think they make more sense with lesser travel and rougher trails.
Longer travel 29ers are always going to of benefit when small wheels beocme a handfull, but it’s diminishing returns, if a bikes only better a fraction of the time then is it worth it?
I like my 29er Xc bike and I’m convinced it’s faster/easier to ride than its 26″ counterparts, I liked my 26″ AM bike, I think a 29er AM bike would be fast, but I’d not be so sure it’d be faster (but probably just as fast) than a 26″ or 650b version. Personal preferance though, 29ers let me get away with more over rough sections, skill, geometry & suspension travel all play a part in the need to ‘get away with’ stuff in the first place.
Will it take a front mech for cheapskates/luddites/the unfit?