Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Load up, load up, load up, those rubber bullets…
- This topic has 112 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by nealglover.
-
Load up, load up, load up, those rubber bullets…
-
richcFree Member
Tory government are expecting it to kick off. I wonder why that could be, it’s not like there are over a million young people getting totally f**ked over or anything is it?
I wouldn’t worry about it, after the cuts its not as if there are going to be many Police left anyway.
LiferFree MemberZulu-Eleven – Member
Source
Jane’s Police Products Review oct 2007
ca. 125,000 baton rounds fired in NI over 35 years, 17 deaths This works out at an average of ten rounds per day and one death every two years, or a death rate of 0.0136%.
Baton round has been changed in design twice since the last death in 89, to reduce its weight and give it a head that deforms if it hits a hard object such as head or breast bone, reducing beak impact force by up to 50%.
So, you’d take it from that that its likley to be even safer than the 35 year figures.
To get an accurate ‘death rate’ you’d need to compare the amount that hit rather than just fired.
meehajaFree MemberI got clipped by a rubber bullet in a training scenario. Couldn’t ride for 5 weeks due to bruising/swelling. Walking was bad enough (hit mid thigh, round bounced off a wall and hit me).
in determinate discharge in a public place is a bad idea.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberTo get an accurate ‘death rate’ you’d need to compare the amount that hit rather than just fired.
Why? do you think that the ones fired in Northern Ireland were intended to miss (from the lads I know, I’m pretty confident that they were fired very much with the intention of not missing!)
I wonder if there’s a perfectly ordinary explanation for the sudden increase
like perhaps the Home office maintained store of riot control equipment, which included baton rounds, CS gas and everything else, of which there has been one since the early 1980’s, was administrativley transferred from home office control to police control during the riots that ocurred last year?
Of course, that wouldnt fit the “oh noes, evil Tories” agenda of the tin foil hat wearers and lefties – it would seem a more sensible and realistic likelihood than suddenly magically finding an extra 10,000 down the back of the sofa, wouldn’t it.
Now, of course, some of you might be shocked to learn that the Home office have seperate stores of equipment, that can be issued in times of disorder, as part of the royal perogative and the duty on the crown to maintain law and order – but it has been a matter of record for years, there was even a fairly important constitutional court case on the issue…
Still, I’m sure that the explanation must be far, far more sinister than a transfer of baton rounds from the Home office to the police, when the Home Secretary had announced that they would have the authority to use them if needed, eh?
Papa_LazarouFree Memberof which there has been one since the early 1980’s
the riots that ocurred last year?
Just trying to remember if there were any significant riots during the 10 years of Labour?
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberDunno, ask the people of Bradford, Oldham, Burnley & Birmingham 😉
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Oldham_race_riots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Bradford_race_riots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Birmingham_race_riotsLiferFree MemberZulu-Eleven – Member
“To get an accurate ‘death rate’ you’d need to compare the amount that hit rather than just fired.”
Why? do you think that the ones fired in Northern Ireland were intended to miss (from the lads I know, I’m pretty confident that they were fired very much with the intention of not missing!)
Where did you get intentionally missed from?
Do you think they’re 100% accurate?
Ones that miss have no chance of causing death. Because they miss. A percentage of those that hit cause deaths, and that is the real death rate.
convertFull Member10000 is not that many really is it? Enough to have them stock piled in a number of handy locations around the capital and arm a couple of hundred suitably qualified police with enough for a busy night and enough spare for the same again the next day. Can’t imagine any sane Commissioner would want to be in charge when even a fraction got used but it would be proper embarrassing to run out. Cost buttons in the big scheme of things and the whole lot would fit in a dozen suit cases.
No biggie IMO.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberDo you think they’re 100% accurate?
The AEP is claimed to exceed 95% accuracy against a 400mm x 600mm target at 50m. again, source, Janes…
so, pretty good – but for the sake of making you happy, 95% accuracy would indicate that your death rate would increase to 0.0143% instead of 0.0136 %
happy now 😉
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberWell, I think you could argue that a fair percentage of those that miss their intended target end up hitting someone else, who was not the intended target, hit them in a part of the body that was not intended, and may in that case cause death, infact its probably more likley to result in death in a situation where they miss their intended target in a chaotic crowd/riot situation with lots of other people around and hit someone else in the head, rather than the lower body of the person they were being aimed at, and that the figure of seventeen would include those killed where the victim was not the intended target – 125,000 is a pretty big sample size to account for “all sorts of eventualities and blind chance” – but if anything you could argue that the more modern ones, with better accuracy and more modern launchers, with red dot/laser sights, are goign to be more likley to hit the intended target than the older ones and therefore safer.
deadlydarcyFree Memberfrom the lads I know
Wow, you know lads that fired rubber bullets…does that make up just a little pit for the feelings of impotence you have for not having had the chance to fire one yourself? Must feel pretty awesome for a guy like you Zulu.
Otherwise, what a bollocks statistic – something that’s supposed not to kill actually killed seventeen people. That’s a fantastic success rate. You must have spaffed all over your copy of Janes when you read that.
TandemJeremyFree Member10 000 baton rounds is an absurd number. that years of supply at the rate they were used in NI during the height of the troubles.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberFunnily enough DD, I’ve not fired a baton round, but I have fired bean bag rounds, which are quite a clever little invention, you can even make a little chair for a pet mouse out of them afterwards, how cute 😉
something that’s supposed not to kill
I think that’s why they call them “less lethal” rather than “non lethal” 🙄
deadlydarcyFree MemberI think that’s why they call them “less lethal” rather than “non lethal”
Well, I dunno Zulu, what are they supposed to do, kill or not kill (and just kinda sting a bit)? You’re our weapons expert…or at least, you seem to be the one that likes them most.
Papa_LazarouFree Memberdeath rate would increase to 0.0143% instead of 0.0136 %
What a low rate of death! I’m sure that figure provides great comfort to the families of civilians killed by baton rounds, as it would be to you should one of your family members get hit in the head by a ricochet whilst out shopping.
oldgitFree MemberGiven the high risk of injury or death with plastic bullets, all Met occifers should have it drilled into their thuggish/racist/distorted minds that these firearms are not advisable for general use on civilians by somewhat following the yank Tazer training system.
‘civil’ ians should be fine.
deadlydarcyFree MemberAnybody got any statistic for the number of M16 5.56mm rounds fired versus number of deaths since 1990?
I have a feeling it’s going to prove that the combination of M16 and M16 5.56mm rounds is indeed quite safe – with a staggeringly low death rate. Somebody’s got to have read a publication with the statistics? If the pages aren’t still stuck together, can that person dig them out for me please?
StonerFree Member10 000 baton rounds is an absurd number. that years of supply at the rate they were used in NI during the height of the troubles.
there’s a substantial difference between numbers used and numbers deployed and reserved.
SO19/CO19 (whatever theyre called) probably have thousands of live rounds at their disposal. Each officer will have a couple of magazines of 20+ rounds each on their person, probably a load more in the boot of the car. And then reserves in the armoury. It doesnt mean theyre planning on deploying them all in one saturday night gun-toting columbine-style cordite-fest does it?
Yoghurt-knitting synthetic outrage of the highest order.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberShould one of your family members get hit in the head by a ricochet whilst out shopping.
Do your family members often go shopping while there’s a full blown riot going on just down the street Papa Lazarou? Mine dont!
kimbersFull Memberoldgit – Member
Given the high risk of injury or death with plastic bullets, all Met occifers should have it drilled into their thuggish/racist/distorted minds that these firearms are not advisable for general use on civilians by somewhat following the yank Tazer training system.
‘civil’ ians should be fine.unless they are kindof dark skinned and running late for their tube
TandemJeremyFree Memberstoner – but what possible purpose does 10 000 of them have?
No way on earth is that any sort of a sensible number considering they have never been deployed on the mainland – hundreds might be reasonable – 10 000? come off it – thats just a huge waste of money
deadlydarcyFree MemberI got loads of stuff given to me for free during the last riots. It’s a bloody brilliant time to go shopping.
CaptainFlashheartFree MemberYoghurt-knitting synthetic outrage of the highest order.
Synthetic? Surely that should be organic and fair trade?
😉
deadlydarcyFree Memberstoner – but what possible purpose does 10 000 of them have?
To kill 1.43 persons?
wwaswasFull Memberthe Royal Artillery fired 170,000,000 shells in the first world war.
I do wonder if their fatality rate/shell was actually any ‘better’ than rubber bullets fired by British Police at civilians?
convertFull MemberTJ – read my post above. It’s about deploying and storing in multiple locations in sufficient quantities and reducing reliance on transport and increasing response time. Only one thing worse than having to use baton rounds on your own population and that’s getting there late in the day when you have totally lost control and having to use a lot more of them.
They’ll also be wanting to lob off a few to make sure they know how to use them and increase the number of officers qualified to use them (to improve the above) which will use quite a few a year I’d imagine.
I’d save getting your knickers in a twist for when we actually have disproportionate USE of them on the mainland.
dave360Full MemberI have fired a few back in the day. They are highly inaccurate because the converted Very pistol that fires them has such a short barrel. So much so that our RUC brothers would hit the ground with them by mistake making the bullets mistakenly bounce up, hitting the protesting catholics at groin height. by mistake. Don’t remember seeing them used against protesting protestants though. Funny that.
TandemJeremyFree MemberConvert – I read it. Its no excuse for 10 000 of them. How many locations? How many in use in any one incident? How many officers that are able to use them. Its totally OTT
I am not outraged – I merely point out the stupidity of this and wonder if its corrupt purchasing – someone just made a load of money on this
They have never been used on the mainland, the met had 700 of them – what has changed that they now need 10 000 of them?
MSPFull MemberI’d save getting your knickers in a twist for when we actually have disproportionate USE of them on the mainland.
That would be too late.
deadlydarcyFree MemberI’m happy to be the 0.43.
0.57 of me is enough for any world anyway. 🙂
nealgloverFree MemberIts no excuse for 10 000 of them. How many locations? How many in use in any one incident? How many officers that are able to use them.
No idea.
You seem to be an expert on how many they need though, so what are the answers to those questions ?
Details please.
They have never been used on the mainland, the met had 700 of them – what has changed that they now need 10 000 of them?
Maybe their policy on usage ?
Quite surprised they didn’t run it past you first to be honest.
CaptainFlashheartFree MemberQuite surprised they didn’t run it past you first to be honest.
*Chuckles*
convertFull Memberwonder if its corrupt purchasing – someone just made a load of money on this
They’re about a quid each!
MSPFull MemberMaybe their policy on usage ?
If the police have changed the policy on using rubber bullets, I would hope it would be part of a public review to do so, not a secret change.
The topic ‘Load up, load up, load up, those rubber bullets…’ is closed to new replies.