- Is there a design rule of thumb relating head angle to wheel size?
Well there’s a formula; wheel radius, head angle and fork rake = trail.Posted 4 years ago
so if you want the same trail and you add 25mm to your rim+tyre diameter, fork is same rake, you’d adjust the head angle by close to a degree. But in reality if you can change one aspect you may want to do other things so it’s better to use rake and HA or all 3 to balance a bike out the way you want it. Rule of thumb, no. Usually it’s trial and error plus experience, or copying someone else’s.thisisnotaspoonMember
There is a mathematical formula that predicts whether the bike will ‘flop’ or not (i.e. it’s tendancy to just fall over when you contersteer into a corner and stay there untill you turn the bars harder to bring the bike back upright).
There’s also the fact that unlike 26″ forks there are still a lot of different offsets on 29″ forks, so one bike may be designed arround a steep head angle and a short offset, another arround a slack angle and larger offset. Both would give similar handling in a straight line, as the trail is the same, but different in a corner.
Or you could just wack a degree on for each wheel size. IIRC Trek (and therefore presumably everyone) work to a tolerance of +/- 0.5deg between head and seatube angles, so it’s concievable that two identical bikes off the shelf could well be further out than the difference between two designs. (i.e. design is 68deg, one could be 67.5, the other 68.5).
Or you could do what Brant alegedly did with the 456, lie through your teath about the geometry and just post up some numbers people want to hear and vaguely describe what people think the handling characteristics should be.Posted 4 years ago
The topic ‘Is there a design rule of thumb relating head angle to wheel size?’ is closed to new replies.