Hmm – is Fred Back?

Ssssssccccchhhhhwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwssscccchhhhhhhhhh…

Just white noise.

I am glad that the important elements of his personality appear to be intact. 🙂

BigDummy – Member

I am glad that the important elements of his personality appear to be intact.

Glad the 'treatments' worked then!

you can be a thick tw at sometimes juan.

Touché.

you can be a thick tw at sometimes juan.

Touché.

Spread the love 😆

gotta just add for the record having met the protagonist several times I can confirm that he is actually a straight up decent fella. end of.

How can anyone trot the moral high ground on his high horse when he's perfectly happy to call someone a "complete ****"?

Who said anything about "the moral high ground" ? 😕

I like to spend a bit of time on the moral low ground with punters who use, with complete disregard to sensitivities of children, ladies, vicars, and other 'polite people', the name : "Fooking Ar$e Holes" as a username.

Which incidentally, adds a special sort of quality to the forum when it appears listed on the index page.

But anyways Porked Soles, why do you appear to be defensive about AdamG ?

You didn't even know the geezer……….I'm telling you, he was a complete ****.

And a hypocrite too. I discovered.

Oh I see! I'd not got it before. Awesome punning username Adam, very subtle. 🙂

Oh I see! I'd not got it before.

Ah, but us who occupy the moral low ground saw the "joke" straight away.

It's actually the reason why I have always refused to call Porked Soles by his proper usename.

Even a foul-mouthed chav like me, has his standards 😐

I'd not got it either. 😳

I suspect "children, ladies, vicars, and other 'polite people'" may be similarly protected by their own naiveté.

I don't like the idea of people disliking me to the point of hatred.

Ah well never mind, dry your eyes and please never come back.

It's actually the reason why I have always refused to call Porked Soles by his proper usename…

Well, if that's not moral high ground, I don't know what is. 🙄

To BD and Graham, sorry if that went over your heads, it works best with a Lancashire accent. 😉

*starts paying more attention to other user names*

Is ernie_lynch a clever pun as well?

Is ernie_lynch a clever pun as well?

There's nothing clever about Ernie Lynch whatsoever.

I'd not got it either……..'polite people' may be similarly protected by their own naiveté.

LOL ! It didn't even occur to me that some people might not have got the "joke" !

Ah, dear…….. the naivety of "polite people" ! 😀

I guess that explains why you accused me of being 'angry' the other day when I called you wan-ka GrahamS ? I thought to myself "wtf is he on about, it's a bog standard off the cuff comment". I can see now that for you it's a bit more serious than that. That's the problem with an internet forum – without seeing and hearing the other person, it's sometimes difficult to gauge what sort of company you are in. Sorry mate 😐

ernie saying sorry!! 😯

*checks view out of window for two blue moons

😆

name calling on the forum is not very nice.
it take a person down a peg in the intelligence stakes in my opinion.
ernie and a few others seem quite good at it.
and they seem to get away with it.
go figure.

slightly OT – was Fred 'Lanesra'?

Sorry mate

No problem ernie. I'm a sensitive flower really 😳 Sorry in return.

my missus saw that thread and suitably chastised me for being an online arse. Apparently I'm far nicer in reality, I just enjoy debating and playing devil's advocate. I have vowed to her that I'll try not to be such a d1ck in future. 🙂

dawson – Member

slightly OT – was Fred 'Lanesra'?

You must be kidding – Lanesra was the antiFred!

Fred – stroppy antiracist socialist with well thought out and reasoned arguments who got up peoples noses

Lanesra – Stroppy bigoted racist with ignorant opinions. One of the most unpleasant people I have ever seen on this forum

speaks one of the main antagonists.

ah, ok. thanks TJ

bombadillo – Member

speaks one of the main antagonists.

you're not that new round here are you…. or did i miss a bit?

name calling on the forum is not very nice. it take a person down a peg in the intelligence stakes in my opinion.

It depends. Like most things in life, a lot of it is just down to common sense, the context for example, is all important. Whether it's in a jokey sort of way, whether the other person is being abusive, the level of "offensiveness" of the word, etc. There's no hard and fast rule – just common sense. I regularly called RudeBoy a ****, and he regularly called me a ****. In fact when he emails me he still calls me a **** (and worst) and we when meet up we invariably exchange expletives. Indeed earlier on this thread I referred to him as an 'ugly f**ker'. Despite the fact that I love the bloke to bits (in a manly sort of way) It's just the way some people are, it's just important to remember that not everyone is the same.

btw bombadillo, you might be surprised to know that I am hugely unbothered how high up the "intelligence stakes" I am. Take me down as many "pegs" as you want – intelligence is a greatly overrated virtue imo, specially on here.

No problem ernie

Thanks 8)

Take me down as many "pegs" as you want – intelligence is a greatly overrated virtue imo, specially on here.

and you expect us to believe that. i think that it is the opposite.
i think that you think you have superior intelligence to the majority on here.

as do quite a few other, might i hasten to add

Sorry tankslapper I did forget about you.

You must be kidding – Lanesra was the antiFred!

Fred – stroppy antiracist socialist with well thought out and reasoned arguments who got up peoples noses

Lanesra – Stroppy bigoted racist with ignorant opinions. One of the most unpleasant people I have ever seen on this forum

The one occasion I saw them both together they seemed to coexist reasonably well. Fred isn't as antagonistic as he portrayed himself, but is possibly louder.

and you expect us to believe that.

LOL ! I don't care whether you believe it or not ! 😀

I happen to think that intelligence is generally an overrated virtue – especially on here. There are plenty of other equally important considerations.

As far as my 'superior intelligence' as you call it, is concerned, I happen to know that it is very average indeed. When I was 13 years old I took part in properly conducted QIs tests. And I can completely assure you, that I am not much more than average. Whether you believe that, is up to you.

What I don't mind admitting is that, imo, I am relatively well-informed (maybe that's what you mean?). But that is a completely different ballgame altogether, and has nothing whatsoever to do with 'intelligence'. There are plenty of people on here who are undoubtedly highly intelligent, and yet often appear to be rather ill-informed. In my case, I would put down to mostly luck and circumstances 8)

When I was 13 years old I took part in properly conducted QIs tests.

Are those hosted by Stephen Fry?

And I can completely assure you, that I am not much more than average.

Really Ernest, no assurances needed here…

IQ tests are terrible measures of intelligence.

According to them, half the population are below average intelligence, which is just daft.

😉

Chuckling at Graham… 😉

"I took part in properly conducted QIs tests."

Are those hosted by Stephen Fry?

No I meant IQ. You can see how backward I am.

Quite. 🙄

juan – Member

Sorry tankslapper I did forget about you.

Aww shucks! Did you miss me? 😉

Soooo Bombadillo…..what you been at since your last incarnation/ banning/resurrection ?

❓

I feel I can almost claim empathy with that exclusive "banned but returned" group having been threatened with a "banning" for calling "crikey" a *v** (four letter word descriptive of a female front bottom, slang) although many other disguised sweary type words seem allowed – Ar$eholes/****-ka and so on.

Plainly, even-handed administration is a foreign country to some… 😉

Dare I mention the French!? No, probably not….. 😳

Dare I mention the French!? No, probably not…..

Nope, they'll surrender 😆

Steady! Remember 'we know where you live'! 😆